Good info.Farmer1906 said:He got healthy after the 2nd TJ and picked up another pitch. That is why he had his best season of his career.Harry Dunne said:True about the cost of pitching and fair enough but our 2 guys weren't starters in 2018 because of an embarrassment of SP riches, not because of inability or injury.Ag_07 said:
I do agree that Eovaldi's hype was driven by his postseason run. He made himself some money.
But I also think that $16.8M per year is pretty fair for him. Pitching ain't cheap. I imagine that the 4 years was the hang up. That's a long time if you find out that his postseason was a fluke.
And my only hesitation comes from the fact that McHugh and Peacock haven't started games in quite a while. McHugh missed most of 2017 with the injury so he hasn't had a full season as a starter since 2016. His 19 game season will be 4 seasons ago in 2019.
Just take a look at all of their numbers and show me why Eovaldi is so much better. He hasn't exactly been a reliable workhorse either & the results are fairly similar. I think the Astros front office concluded that it's better to go with our (cheaper) guys and either pay more for a proven commodity or identify a better bargain like Morton or McHugh at the time we picked them up, which seems to be their specialty.
His K-BB % grew from a steady 11.6, 10.7, 10.9 and then to 17.8.
But just for perspective, that means his best season is a 3.81 ERA and 111 IP. So you can understand where the Astros wouldn't want to pay $17M per for 4 years to a guy who has had 2 Tommy Johns, sat all of 2017, and counts that as his best season.
We're going in circles here so I'm going to stop beating a dead horse. I'm glad we passed, at that price. Time will tell if he was worth the risk for the Red Sox.