quote:
quote:
You have to put yourself in position for luck.
With Hinch, both offensively and defensively, we screw the pooch and never give luck a chance. When you constantly pull guys based on lefty righty, shift all over the place, and refuse to let players like White and Tucker bat against players that throw from the same side of the plate, you essentially reset the luck count.
That's all just pure conjecture.
How is trying to get a platoon advantage decreasing your likelihood of bad or good luck?
How is shifting increasing or decreasing luck?
Whether you like to believe it or not, there is a lot left up to the BABIP dragons in baseball. Over the course of a whole season, things usually remotely normalize.
Jose Altuve routinely has a high BABIP.
Jake Marisnick routinely has a low BABIP.
You pure stat guys love BABIP, but its good for nothing more than a sweeping glance. The best hitters are going to hit the ball harder and to more fields than the worst hitters. They are ALWAYS going to have a high BABIP, because they are skilled enough to find the gaps that others cant.
And you can't quantify luck. You can't use BABIP to say a team is lucky or unlucky. A team that doesn't strike out is going to be immensely more lucky than the Astros.. because they put the ball in play and give themselves a chance to have luck.
Saying we are unlucky is undermining the more serious issues, and completely avoiding the fact that if you are going to use that logic, you then have to say that we were EXTREMELY lucky last year (especially when you consider how badly the Mariners underperformed).. and that this year is closer to our norm than "unlucky".
Maybe this was bound to happen at some point.. because you have a team of young guys who have no idea what winning in MLB costs both as a player and as a person. Maybe these guys, while not even knowing it, were completely unprepared to be a top team with expectations. And maybe it didnt help that their manager is a guy who also hasnt experienced success or high expectations.