Quote:
Happy for the cubbies but I'm not gonna lie, heading to Chicago tomorrow morning and was getting excited to spend the day at wrigleyville for game 5.
I agree. That game would have been tough. As great as Lester been, the cubs bats were struggling.diehard03 said:Quote:
Happy for the cubbies but I'm not gonna lie, heading to Chicago tomorrow morning and was getting excited to spend the day at wrigleyville for game 5.
I wanted no part of Cueto/Bum in a game 5...especially after Game 1.
I agree but I would like a less stressful event if possible. Game 4 almost did me in.Junkhead said:
I think the Dodgers would probably be a better match-up pitching wise but I'm honestly not sure it even matters at this point. I don't want to sound too cocky, but with the way we won that Giants series I can't imagine either team beating us 4 times in the NLCS.
Quote:
I think the Dodgers would probably be a better match-up pitching wise but I'm honestly not sure it even matters at this point. I don't want to sound too cocky, but with the way we won that Giants series I can't imagine either team beating us 4 times in the NLCS.
diehard03 said:Quote:
I think the Dodgers would probably be a better match-up pitching wise but I'm honestly not sure it even matters at this point. I don't want to sound too cocky, but with the way we won that Giants series I can't imagine either team beating us 4 times in the NLCS.
mmm...no Scherzer until Game 3 and Bryce Harper not being Bryce Harper?
Junkhead said:
Cubs' 1st five NLCS games to start at 7:08 p.m.
They expect it to go more than 5?
trying to think what the upside of this would be..... allows him to come back in game 5 on 3 days rest??Junkhead said:
This idea is...stupid.
10andBOUNCE said:
Buster Olney reported that Kershaw is expected to now start games 2, 4, 6 and 7 and will be the closer in all other games.