ddub96 said:
I remember tonight why I don't really miss the nba. The rockets were ultimately outclassed by an unbelievably talented team who can shoot incredibly well. But they also thrive off of momentum and that can absolutely be helped. And that is where I have trouble taking the nba seriously.
I have often talked with friends about how the nba isn't going to "fix" a game but I also think you are completely ignoring the obvious if you don't think they influence outcomes. Tonight was a perfect example. Rockets shot horribly but golden state was given the chance to get back into that game by the officials. The calls were that bad as I watched. Time and time again the rockets couldn't buy a call until golden state had all the momentum. Now it is up to the rockets to overcome it and they weren't good enough. But that game was absolutely not called straight up - specifically the 3rd quarter - and they gave golden state the chance to get back into it.
This article certainly supports this theory from a former nba official (the one convicted in points shaving). No fix but certainly a league agenda.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/early-lead/wp/2017/06/12/former-nba-referee-says-league-wants-officials-to-help-cavaliers-win-game-5/
I wouldn't take anything Donaghy says seriously. Even ignoring the point shaving, it's been obvious for some time all he cares about getting his name out there to make a buck. He's the NBA equivalent of Pete Rose signing baseballs saying "I bet on baseball" because someone will pay him to do it.
Refs are refs. They aren't consistent. They aren't infallible. They miss a ton of calls and can absolutely impact the flow of the game.
But just like ref-blaming in any sport -- you notice the times it hurts you, but ignore the times it helps you. The one constant is the team on the losing side of things is the one predominantly blaming the refs -- in any sport... so that should give you an idea if it's really the difference-maker or the scapegoat.