Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

I didn't see the Kawhi injury live and I was expecting to see something way more egregious than what I saw in the replay after reading some comments in here.

No way was that intentional. Sure, the defender could have done more to ensure he didn't interfere with Kawhi's landing, but that's not his job.

It's a shame he went down, was hoping the Spurs would win this series.

---

It is a foul if you don't give the shooter space to land. By definition, it is his job to give him space to land....

Your opinion on the matter means very little after getting the most important part of the issue wrong.

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

I didn't see the Kawhi injury live and I was expecting to see something way more egregious than what I saw in the replay after reading some comments in here.

No way was that intentional. Sure, the defender could have done more to ensure he didn't interfere with Kawhi's landing, but that's not his job.

It's a shame he went down, was hoping the Spurs would win this series.

---

It is a foul if you don't give the shooter space to land. By definition, it is his job to give him space to land....

Your opinion on the matter means very little after getting the most important part of the issue wrong.

---

Yes, it was a foul and he was called for it. It was not dirty nor intentional.

---

Deluxe said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

I didn't see the Kawhi injury live and I was expecting to see something way more egregious than what I saw in the replay after reading some comments in here.

No way was that intentional. Sure, the defender could have done more to ensure he didn't interfere with Kawhi's landing, but that's not his job.

It's a shame he went down, was hoping the Spurs would win this series.

---

It is a foul if you don't give the shooter space to land. By definition, it is his job to give him space to land....

Your opinion on the matter means very little after getting the most important part of the issue wrong.

---

Yes, it was a foul and he was called for it. It was not dirty nor intentional.

---

It was intentional. Do you think ALLLLLL these people who talk/write about basketball for a living would be bringing it up if it wasn't dirty?

I'll admit he couldn't possibly have placed his foot in the exact square it needed to be for Kawhi to land on it, but that isn't even close to the point. He wasn't contesting a shot. He was trying to get under Kawhi so he didn't have a flat place to land.

If you think otherwise, you're just a Spurs hater or an idiot.

---

What does that say about Kawhi himself??

---

Kawhi has never been a guy to stir the pot. Of course he's going to take the high road.

---

rsf0626 said:

---

I'm not a GSW fan or SAS fan, but the Zaza play was very bruce bowen type play....spurs fans, y'all remember that guy right?

---

LawHall88 said:

---

---

Ulrich said:

---

If it was anyone but Zaza I think people would be less fired up, but he's a goon. Remember the game when he was on the Mavs where he leg-whipped Danny and tried to Olynyk Kawhi's arm?

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

I didn't see the Kawhi injury live and I was expecting to see something way more egregious than what I saw in the replay after reading some comments in here.

No way was that intentional. Sure, the defender could have done more to ensure he didn't interfere with Kawhi's landing, but that's not his job.

It's a shame he went down, was hoping the Spurs would win this series.

---

It is a foul if you don't give the shooter space to land. By definition, it is his job to give him space to land....

Your opinion on the matter means very little after getting the most important part of the issue wrong.

---

Yes, it was a foul and he was called for it. It was not dirty nor intentional.

---

It was intentional. Do you think ALLLLLL these people who talk/write about basketball for a living would be bringing it up if it wasn't dirty?

I'll admit he couldn't possibly have placed his foot in the exact square it needed to be for Kawhi to land on it, but that isn't even close to the point. He wasn't contesting a shot. He was trying to get under Kawhi so he didn't have a flat place to land.

If you think otherwise, you're just a Spurs hater or an idiot.

---

What does that say about Kawhi himself??

---

Ags #1 said:

---

Rsf with the mike drop.

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

I didn't see the Kawhi injury live and I was expecting to see something way more egregious than what I saw in the replay after reading some comments in here.

No way was that intentional. Sure, the defender could have done more to ensure he didn't interfere with Kawhi's landing, but that's not his job.

It's a shame he went down, was hoping the Spurs would win this series.

---

It is a foul if you don't give the shooter space to land. By definition, it is his job to give him space to land....

Your opinion on the matter means very little after getting the most important part of the issue wrong.

---

Yes, it was a foul and he was called for it. It was not dirty nor intentional.

---

It was intentional. Do you think ALLLLLL these people who talk/write about basketball for a living would be bringing it up if it wasn't dirty?

I'll admit he couldn't possibly have placed his foot in the exact square it needed to be for Kawhi to land on it, but that isn't even close to the point. He wasn't contesting a shot. He was trying to get under Kawhi so he didn't have a flat place to land.

If you think otherwise, you're just a Spurs hater or an idiot.

---

What does that say about Kawhi himself??

---

Just because he doesn't go and run his mouth like punk ass Draymond doesn't mean he isn't thinking it.

You're just being intentionally think, now.

---

AustinAg2012 said:

---

You still have your loser Rockets goggles on, guy.

Zaza knew exactly what he was doing. He has his entire crap career. GS probably woulda won this series even if they lost G1 yesterday, but this scumbag play guarantees they advance. I really hope Tristan Thompson knocks him on his dirty ass in the finals.

---

Guitarsoup said:

---

Deluxe said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

I didn't see the Kawhi injury live and I was expecting to see something way more egregious than what I saw in the replay after reading some comments in here.

No way was that intentional. Sure, the defender could have done more to ensure he didn't interfere with Kawhi's landing, but that's not his job.

It's a shame he went down, was hoping the Spurs would win this series.

---

It is a foul if you don't give the shooter space to land. By definition, it is his job to give him space to land....

Your opinion on the matter means very little after getting the most important part of the issue wrong.

---

Yes, it was a foul and he was called for it. It was not dirty nor intentional.

---

It was intentional. Do you think ALLLLLL these people who talk/write about basketball for a living would be bringing it up if it wasn't dirty?

I'll admit he couldn't possibly have placed his foot in the exact square it needed to be for Kawhi to land on it, but that isn't even close to the point. He wasn't contesting a shot. He was trying to get under Kawhi so he didn't have a flat place to land.

If you think otherwise, you're just a Spurs hater or an idiot.

---

What does that say about Kawhi himself??

---

Kawhi has never been a guy to stir the pot. Of course he's going to take the high road.

---

Fans of James Harden, Nene and Patrick Beverly aren't very familiar with the high road.

---

Frok said:

---

Guitarsoup said:

---

Deluxe said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

Obi Wan Ginobili said:

---

primomosquito said:

---

I didn't see the Kawhi injury live and I was expecting to see something way more egregious than what I saw in the replay after reading some comments in here.

No way was that intentional. Sure, the defender could have done more to ensure he didn't interfere with Kawhi's landing, but that's not his job.

It's a shame he went down, was hoping the Spurs would win this series.

---

It is a foul if you don't give the shooter space to land. By definition, it is his job to give him space to land....

Your opinion on the matter means very little after getting the most important part of the issue wrong.

---

Yes, it was a foul and he was called for it. It was not dirty nor intentional.

---

It was intentional. Do you think ALLLLLL these people who talk/write about basketball for a living would be bringing it up if it wasn't dirty?

I'll admit he couldn't possibly have placed his foot in the exact square it needed to be for Kawhi to land on it, but that isn't even close to the point. He wasn't contesting a shot. He was trying to get under Kawhi so he didn't have a flat place to land.

If you think otherwise, you're just a Spurs hater or an idiot.

---

What does that say about Kawhi himself??

---

Kawhi has never been a guy to stir the pot. Of course he's going to take the high road.

---

Fans of James Harden, Nene and Patrick Beverly aren't very familiar with the high road.

---

James Harden is a dirty player? Sure he is a flopper. But he's definitely not dirty or much of a trash talker.

---