NBA treats players like their wimps

2,066 Views | 11 Replies | Last: 8 yr ago by letters at random
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Every hard foul is looked at if its a flagrant foul and a lot of weak crap gets called flagrant. This is why the old dudes don't respect steph curry and say the league is soft.
Obi Wan Ginobili
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Steph, LeBron, KD, etc are all about to ink 30-40 million dollar max deals. I don't think they give a rats ass what a couple of old dudes think.
QBCade
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NBA realized a while ago that fans like high scoring games. You really want to go back to watching teams score in the 80s?
beerad12man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I do.
Dan Scott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't like the ref going to the monitor after every hard foul.
QBCade
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
I don't like the ref going to the monitor after every hard foul.


This I agree with.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
NBA realized a while ago that fans like high scoring games. You really want to go back to watching teams score in the 80s?
80s were great. The Knicks-Heat slugfests were terrible, except when they were actually slugging.
Matsui
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This basketball is fun
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I mentioned it before, but I feel like the flagrant foul review and assessment is worse than the Hack-a-whatever...

Almost every moderately hard foul where the offensive player goes to the ground is now ruled a flagrant 1.

After event, this is the commentators:
"Hard foul given by Tav'on Tsunojukovic. Officials want to review"
"It's a good hard foul, very little contact to the head or shoulders, so this should just be a common foul"

(Long break from action)

"Well, they've ruled it a Flagrant 1. I guess they decided it was excessive force"
"That really surprised me (enter story from 1980s). I really don't see what they are seeing"



I also am not a fan of offensive players barreling into defenders at the rim and getting a call.
WES2006AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I heard JVG on a broadcast a while back talking about how he didn't know the difference between a common foul and a flagrant 1 anymore. The NBA has made this a moving target and different officials will rule very differently on similar plays.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
I mentioned it before, but I feel like the flagrant foul review and assessment is worse than the Hack-a-whatever...

Almost every moderately hard foul where the offensive player goes to the ground is now ruled a flagrant 1.

After event, this is the commentators:
"Hard foul given by Tav'on Tsunojukovic. Officials want to review"
"It's a good hard foul, very little contact to the head or shoulders, so this should just be a common foul"

(Long break from action)

"Well, they've ruled it a Flagrant 1. I guess they decided it was excessive force"
"That really surprised me (enter story from 1980s). I really don't see what they are seeing"



I also am not a fan of offensive players barreling into defenders at the rim and getting a call.
This needs to be looked at, but then LeBron, Harden, and Westbrook would be out of jobs.
misterguinness
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
quote:
NBA realized a while ago that fans like high scoring games. You really want to go back to watching teams score in the 80s?


You mean like game 1 of the 1985 NBA finals when Boston beat the Lakers 148-114?
letters at random
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's the players fault; they're Union representatives know there way around a courthouse, and the owners know that if they let the league get two physical, their will be hell too pay.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.