Every hard foul is looked at if its a flagrant foul and a lot of weak crap gets called flagrant. This is why the old dudes don't respect steph curry and say the league is soft.
quote:
I don't like the ref going to the monitor after every hard foul.
quote:80s were great. The Knicks-Heat slugfests were terrible, except when they were actually slugging.
NBA realized a while ago that fans like high scoring games. You really want to go back to watching teams score in the 80s?
quote:This needs to be looked at, but then LeBron, Harden, and Westbrook would be out of jobs.
I mentioned it before, but I feel like the flagrant foul review and assessment is worse than the Hack-a-whatever...
Almost every moderately hard foul where the offensive player goes to the ground is now ruled a flagrant 1.
After event, this is the commentators:
"Hard foul given by Tav'on Tsunojukovic. Officials want to review"
"It's a good hard foul, very little contact to the head or shoulders, so this should just be a common foul"
(Long break from action)
"Well, they've ruled it a Flagrant 1. I guess they decided it was excessive force"
"That really surprised me (enter story from 1980s). I really don't see what they are seeing"
I also am not a fan of offensive players barreling into defenders at the rim and getting a call.
quote:
NBA realized a while ago that fans like high scoring games. You really want to go back to watching teams score in the 80s?