http://www.si.com/nba/2015/08/31/cleveland-cavaliers-tristan-thompson-contract
I watched Thompson in the finals, and there's no denying he does some things well. Elements of his defense are good (specifically, he's athletic enough to defend the pick and roll well) and he's a great rebounder. But a max player? I don't see it. He gets most of his points off of offensive rebounds + putbacks and from what I saw, he's still a pretty bad rim protector (he was one of the worst in the NBA a season ago).
You don't give max money for junkyard offense and mediocre defense, right?
quote:My "Holy ****" has 2 components. 1) Cleveland offered Thompson 5/80. 2) Thompson turned it down because he thought he was worth more.
Thompson reportedly turned down a five-year, $80 million offer from Cleveland earlier this off-season. A max deal for Thompson would cost Cleveland more than $94 million over five years.
I watched Thompson in the finals, and there's no denying he does some things well. Elements of his defense are good (specifically, he's athletic enough to defend the pick and roll well) and he's a great rebounder. But a max player? I don't see it. He gets most of his points off of offensive rebounds + putbacks and from what I saw, he's still a pretty bad rim protector (he was one of the worst in the NBA a season ago).
You don't give max money for junkyard offense and mediocre defense, right?