*****COPA America 2024*****

52,080 Views | 850 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by tysker
In reply to
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just add that to a list of reasons to fire GGG.
gambochaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Wish these announcers had the balls to call these kicks out. That's an illegal kick


Which one?

Any pk where they start and stop, including the last one


That's legal. You can do it in the run up. You just can't feint when you get to the ball

Math, help me out here.
concac
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Wish these announcers had the balls to call these kicks out. That's an illegal kick


Which one?

Any pk where they start and stop, including the last one


That's legal. You can do it in the run up. You just can't feint when you get to the ball

Math, help me out here.

That's what I thought, too.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Wish these announcers had the balls to call these kicks out. That's an illegal kick


Which one?

Any pk where they start and stop, including the last one


That's legal. You can do it in the run up. You just can't feint when you get to the ball

Math, help me out here.



Feint and stop and start all you want until you get to the ball. Once you get to the ball then you have to kick in one motion.

It's BS but it's the Law.
Out in Left Field
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They definitely need to outlaw it. If you can't score from 12 yards on a normal run up then GTFO.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Wish these announcers had the balls to call these kicks out. That's an illegal kick


Which one?

Any pk where they start and stop, including the last one


That's legal. You can do it in the run up. You just can't feint when you get to the ball

Math, help me out here.

Im saying it shouldnt be
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Wish these announcers had the balls to call these kicks out. That's an illegal kick


Which one?

Any pk where they start and stop, including the last one


That's legal. You can do it in the run up. You just can't feint when you get to the ball

Math, help me out here.

Im saying it shouldnt be


Absolutely that's not what you said but maybe what you meant.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Rudyjax said:

PatAg said:

Wish these announcers had the balls to call these kicks out. That's an illegal kick


Which one?

Any pk where they start and stop, including the last one


That's legal. You can do it in the run up. You just can't feint when you get to the ball

Math, help me out here.

Im saying it shouldnt be


Absolutely that's not what you said but maybe what you meant.
that "should be" an illegal kick
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Wish these announcers had the balls to call these kicks out. That's an illegal kick

PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rudyjax said:

Quote:

Wish these announcers had the balls to call these kicks out. That's an illegal kick




Yea I just wrote what I meant.
you're being weird
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

Rudyjax said:

Quote:

Wish these announcers had the balls to call these kicks out. That's an illegal kick




Yea I just wrote what I meant.
you're being weird



They're not illegal. Why would the announcers call them out as being illegal?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let's go Colombia

After two great euro QF matches today and saw England and Netherlands through to semifinals at the end, I'd like to see Panama get their asses handed to them.
concac
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2-0 Colombia.

How embarrassing for USMNT and Berhalter.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
concac said:

2-0 Colombia.

How embarrassing for USMNT and Berhalter.
usa was going to handle them before weah rc

Panama is without that good central midfielder from the dynamo today- suspended
KCup17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I still think we should have handled them even after the red card.

But yes the fact that Colombia is destroying them adds to our embarrassment
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I dont think it adds to it, we already knew we should have done this to Panama.
We should have also worked them over.
This should be a way to evaluate whoever we hire, if we hire, given the lack of real tests between now and the world cup.
Its one thing to destroy Guatemala, are you also dominating the Panama, Jamaicas, and Costa Ricas of the world. Not necessarily score line domination, but just when you watch the games those teams should not hang with us.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think Panama had any business being in the QF of this tournament and that's an embarrassment for USA to beat, but also, Colombia has looked like one of the best squads in the world right now. Best 11 for France, Portugal, Brazil are amazing on paper but not playing like it. Colombia is playing like it.
Dre_00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are we sure we would have? Honest question as watched zero of that game. But based on previous performances I'm far from certain that the US would have handled Panama.
concac
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

concac said:

2-0 Colombia.

How embarrassing for USMNT and Berhalter.
usa was going to handle them before weah rc

Panama is without that good central midfielder from the dynamo today- suspended
Sure, like how we handled Bolivia with a full squad? The same Bolivia team that is the lowest ranked team in the tournament?

You give USMNT too much credit.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dre_00 said:

Are we sure we would have? Honest question as watched zero of that game. But based on previous performances I'm far from certain that the US would have handled Panama.
well we were on fire with the early goal disallowed and then the man down goal. I think we would have been fine 11v11.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
concac said:

oh no said:

concac said:

2-0 Colombia.

How embarrassing for USMNT and Berhalter.
usa was going to handle them before weah rc

Panama is without that good central midfielder from the dynamo today- suspended
Sure, like how we handled Bolivia with a full squad? The same Bolivia team that is the lowest ranked team in the tournament?

You give USMNT too much credit.
Did you change your name?
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

concac said:

oh no said:

concac said:

2-0 Colombia.

How embarrassing for USMNT and Berhalter.
usa was going to handle them before weah rc

Panama is without that good central midfielder from the dynamo today- suspended
Sure, like how we handled Bolivia with a full squad? The same Bolivia team that is the lowest ranked team in the tournament?

You give USMNT too much credit.
Did you change your name?
concacafRulez must have hit the character limit.
concac
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

PatAg said:

concac said:

oh no said:

concac said:

2-0 Colombia.

How embarrassing for USMNT and Berhalter.
usa was going to handle them before weah rc

Panama is without that good central midfielder from the dynamo today- suspended
Sure, like how we handled Bolivia with a full squad? The same Bolivia team that is the lowest ranked team in the tournament?

You give USMNT too much credit.
Did you change your name?
concacafRulez must have hit the character limit.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
At least they didn't give up 5 to Colombia yet
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
surprised Panama didnt immediately go into "injure the opponent" mode at the start of the 2nd
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wangus12 said:

At least they didn't give up 5 to Colombia yet
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hey I said Yet.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ready for Darwin & Uruguay to face a vini-less and Neymar-less Brazil that hasn't seemed to look like they're supposed to yet
concac
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

Ready for Darwin & Uruguay to face a vini-less and Neymar-less Brazil that hasn't seemed to look like they're supposed to yet
Brazil has been waiting for 22 years to look like what they're supposed to.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's a weird/risky move to start Endrick up top. Pretty sure he's always played wing in Brazil and he's not exactly a big kid. I'm biased, but I'd have gone with Martinelli. He's play CF for Arsenal albeit years ago

Will be interesting to see how the kid does
Post removed:
by user
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
****housery at 11 already.
gougler08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brazil is incapable of fouling apparently
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Darwin Nuñez you are one pathetic loser
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.