Something tells me that there will be 4-6 minutes of stoppage time in the second half.bigjag19 said:
3 minutes of stoppage with a long VAR and 3 goals including a penalty.
That makes perfect sense.
Something tells me that there will be 4-6 minutes of stoppage time in the second half.bigjag19 said:
3 minutes of stoppage with a long VAR and 3 goals including a penalty.
That makes perfect sense.
And none from playaggietony2010 said:
They have a 2-1 lead with 1 shot.
wangus12 said:
Mbappe learning from Neymar to go down way to easy
mathguy86 said:
Some of you crack me up. You want VAR to intervene to catch diving but don't want it to penalize blatant handling.
aggietony2010 said:mathguy86 said:
Some of you crack me up. You want VAR to intervene to catch diving but don't want it to penalize blatant handling.
Everything was handled properly. There wouldn't be any controversy if the free kick hadn't turned into a goal. But the fact that VAR can overturn only some egregious errors and not others is the frustrating part.
There isn't a good way to handle it unfortunately.
who?mikejones said:
I hate replay in all sports. It ruins the game. I dont care if a bad call is made correct. Its part of the game. Good and bad calls have been apart of all sports since their inception. They are a part of the story and a part of the game. I guess replay is a perfect example of the current society's feelings on "fairness" and inability to handle adversity.
I especially hate the way replay is used in modern sports. If you going to use it, use it for all or use it for nothing. This game is a perfect example. The replay could have negated an illegitimate goal by reversing a bad call and then have correctly called the handball. Why is it not like this?
If the goal is ultimately to ensure the correct result, why not play the game and then adjust the final on review afterward?
So you just agreed that it ruins itgambochaman said:who?mikejones said:
I hate replay in all sports. It ruins the game. I dont care if a bad call is made correct. Its part of the game. Good and bad calls have been apart of all sports since their inception. They are a part of the story and a part of the game. I guess replay is a perfect example of the current society's feelings on "fairness" and inability to handle adversity.
I especially hate the way replay is used in modern sports. If you going to use it, use it for all or use it for nothing. This game is a perfect example. The replay could have negated an illegitimate goal by reversing a bad call and then have correctly called the handball. Why is it not like this?
If the goal is ultimately to ensure the correct result, why not play the game and then adjust the final on review afterward?
Disagree that it ruins it. To me taking controversy away makes the game MUCH better
But you are right thay it should be used for all or not at al
Again, you are talking about rerefereeing a game. You just can't do that. What if that player you penalize after the game is given a second card? VAR is designed to catch the ones that most affect the game. The ones inside the area. Sometimes you think you see something and you get duped. It happens.who?mikejones said:
Retroactive cards for diving would end it quickly. Especially in a tournament environment.
mwho?mikejones said:
Retroactive cards for diving would end it quickly. Especially in a tournament environment.
MookieBlaylock said:So you just agreed that it ruins itgambochaman said:who?mikejones said:
I hate replay in all sports. It ruins the game. I dont care if a bad call is made correct. Its part of the game. Good and bad calls have been apart of all sports since their inception. They are a part of the story and a part of the game. I guess replay is a perfect example of the current society's feelings on "fairness" and inability to handle adversity.
I especially hate the way replay is used in modern sports. If you going to use it, use it for all or use it for nothing. This game is a perfect example. The replay could have negated an illegitimate goal by reversing a bad call and then have correctly called the handball. Why is it not like this?
If the goal is ultimately to ensure the correct result, why not play the game and then adjust the final on review afterward?
Disagree that it ruins it. To me taking controversy away makes the game MUCH better
But you are right thay it should be used for all or not at al
who?mikejones said:
Yet, here we are, debating controversial replay/non replay decisions.
who?mikejones said:
I agree. It was a handball when you slow it down frame by frame.
But, many people disagree with you. And the first goal is still a major issue
gougler08 said:
Croatia is bossing this
fig96 said:
Mbappe did a good job staying on his feet there, there was some contact but don't think he would've gotten the call.