Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

t.u. suing local College Station business over "Saw`em Off" logo.

19,634 Views | 78 Replies | Last: 19 yr ago by AgE2theCorps
AggieFrog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Are you selling it for personal gain?

Doesn't matter if I did:

quote:
In Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.[17] the Supreme Court recognized parody as a fair use, even when done for profit. Roy Orbison's publisher, Acuff-Rose Music Inc., had sued 2 Live Crew in 1989 for their use of Orbison's "Oh, Pretty Woman" in a mocking rap version with altered lyrics. The Supreme Court viewed 2 Live Crew's version as a ridiculing commentary on the earlier work, and ruled that when the parody was itself the product rather than used for mere advertising, commercial sale did not bar the defense. The Campbell court also distinguished parodies from satire, which they described as a broader social critique not intrinsically tied to ridicule of a specific work, and so not deserving of the same use exceptions as parody because the satirist's ideas are capable of expression without the use of the other particular work.

In a more recent parody case, Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin, a suit was brought unsuccessfully against the publication of The Wind Done Gone, which reused many of the characters and situations from Gone with the Wind, but told the events from the point of view of the slaves rather than the slaveholders. The Eleventh Circuit, applying Campbell, recognized that The Wind Done Gone was a protected parody, and vacated the district court's injunction against its publication.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use
Tex117
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The sad thing is; I have used the Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music in a memo I wrote for law school.

Im pathetic
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
I don't care about the inferiority complex

Yeah poking fun at your rival = inferiority complex.

Oh...but it's ok for 'horns to wear "OU Sucks" shirts and stickers at the RRS every year.

Give me a break.

The very fact that your school is just now pursuing this after almost ten years pretty much makes the 'inferiority complex' argument look silly.

[This message has been edited by Gigem314 (edited 1/23/2007 11:53a).]
SmartGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gigem...how long did you aggies wait to pursue the 12 man thing in Seattle? 12 years...great point you just made.
highwayman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gigem, UT shirts that read "OU sucks" don't feature any logos previously trademarked by the University of Oklahoma
AggieDubs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would rather Aggies where Aggie stuff. However, I also hate to see someone build a business and lose it. Hopefully they can come up with some good ideas pertaining to Aggies to replace the other.

I do find it very confusing that over a year ago these shirts were made in support of t.u. by some (probably not too many) Aggies. To me, this shirt looks like more of an infringement than a steer with no horns...yet no law suits arose. I guess if you support them they don't sue.

Lysis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smartguy, read up about a topic before you comment on it.

wait. . . just read the earlier posts in THIS VERY THREAD and you will realize how your post is incorrect.

well done.


EDIT: I felt bad for you so I decided to copy paste the quote so you dont have to sift through 3 whole pages of posts to find the one I was referring to.

"There are far more A&M stickers and clothing sold at AO than saw 'em off stuff. Plus, this case doesn't have much merit, unless tu had sent a cease and decist order to AO when it first started the "saw 'em off" sales. If they didn't do that 10 years ago, it has then shown precedence of not defending its trademark and so the trademark would become null and void.

For those who care, this case is alot different from our case with the Seahawks. They may have been using it in a non-official capacity for 10 or so years now, but that started using it for marketing purpose only 2 years ago. When that happened, A&M sent them the cease and decist order. Seattle stonewalled it and never replied or complied. Thus we took them to court"


~Lysis. . . .Class of 05

[This message has been edited by Lysis (edited 1/24/2007 2:52a).]
andesag2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't see how you guy's can say the owner of AO is just profiting off Aggie student's...The dude graduated from A&M in '91...So he is an Ag too. Maybe we should all support a fellow Ag instead of throwing him to the wolves...
Poindexter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why now?
What took so long?
The longhorn logo was registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office about 25 years ago as the exclusive trademark property of TexasU.
One has to have the written permission from TexasU to reproduce it (in any form or fashion) for commercial gain and/or public display.
It is at the discretion of TexasU to enforce the restrictions of their registered trademark but longhorn logo "Saw 'em off" type stickers and shirts have been around for the last 25 years.
Probably more to the story than we've heard so far.
More than likely the defendant retailer named in civil suit probably has refused to give plaintiff TexasU a slice of the profit pie from sales of reproduction and that's why the litigation has finally come to be over this particular infringement.
AgE2theCorps
How long do you want to ignore this user?
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/4493985.html



[This message has been edited by AgE2theCorps (edited 1/24/2007 3:40p).]
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.