Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Kentucky Is not who we thought they were

6,114 Views | 31 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by 72jag
phx-ag86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sad to see all the negativity on TA about our NFL-caliber QB, our incredible head coach, and the carefully selected players and staff he's assembled. Everyone needs to relax and get some perspective about what we just witnessed.

Kentucky is going to win the NC. They're an incredibly talented and well-coached team and somehow they've managed to fly completely under the radar. Hard to believe nobody has noticed.
He is Ass My Dude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Other than that, all is great. Oh wait, Elko just wasted an entire off-season.
tandy miller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think Kentucky is about what we thought they were; they got shut out by a bama team that struggled against a ****ty fsu team.

I think A&M (and esp Marcel) is not who we thought they were
bigfooticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wut….They did not get shut out. They were actually winning at half against the gumps
Featured Video Previews
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tandy miller said:

I think Kentucky is about what we thought they were; they got shut out by a bama team that struggled against a ****ty fsu team.

I think A&M (and esp Marcel) is not who we thought they were


Maybe in the 2nd half. They were smacking Bama around prior to that.
tandy miller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bigfooticus said:

Wut….They did not get shut out. They were actually winning at half against the gumps



Yeah, bc the halftime score is what goes on their record. How many points did they score in the second half? I can't remember.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bigfooticus said:

Wut….They did not get shut out. They were actually winning at half against the gumps


I think he meant second half after they were, as you said, up at the half (by 4). Keep in mind that while both teams had picks returned for TDs in the first half, UK ended the half with a FG after intercepting a Bama pass near mid-field. Otherwise, it would have been a 1-point lead.

Like us, Bama starts slow it appears. Unlike us, UK finished the game strong yesterday -- something they didn't do against Bama.
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tandy miller said:

bigfooticus said:

Wut….They did not get shut out. They were actually winning at half against the gumps



Yeah, bc the halftime score is what goes on their record. How many points did they score in the second half? I can't remember.


1. You're the one that said they got shut out. They didn't.
2. We aren't Bama and they completely manhandled us.
tandy miller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cromagnum said:

tandy miller said:

bigfooticus said:

Wut….They did not get shut out. They were actually winning at half against the gumps



Yeah, bc the halftime score is what goes on their record. How many points did they score in the second half? I can't remember.


1. You're the one that said they got shut out. They didn't.
2. We aren't Bama and they completely manhandled us.


1. I assumed yall would understand what I meant; my mistake. I'll be more specific next time
2. Let's see how they do the rest of the season before we crown Kentucky SEC champ. Iirc, they weren't the ones ranked in the top 10 going into yesterday.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kentucky = best one loss team in the country
BattleAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tandy miller said:

Cromagnum said:

tandy miller said:

bigfooticus said:

Wut….They did not get shut out. They were actually winning at half against the gumps



Yeah, bc the halftime score is what goes on their record. How many points did they score in the second half? I can't remember.


1. You're the one that said they got shut out. They didn't.
2. We aren't Bama and they completely manhandled us.


1. I assumed yall would understand what I meant; my mistake. I'll be more specific next time
2. Let's see how they do the rest of the season before we crown Kentucky SEC champ. Iirc, they weren't the ones ranked in the top 10 going into yesterday.


I've seen hardly anyone on Texags "crowning" Kentucky. As for OP … I'm of the mind he was being sarcastic. If not, I think he's delusional. National championship?
MosesHallDeadPot94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
phx-ag86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MosesHallDeadPot94 said:




I was surprised it took so long for someone to post that
OldArmyAggie94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah they are they playing the SEC. We played liked garbage.
phx-ag86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
UK is for real! Another W against a tough SEC opponent.
AgOutsideAustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Another dumbass move by a coach. 10 minutes left in the fourth quarter and Beamer should've kicked the field goal now he lost the game. Dumbass.
phx-ag86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And another W for Kentucky!
NewArmy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kentucky LSU was amazing. Amazing job by Will Stein.
phx-ag86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And another W for Kentucky. Maybe the Ags aren't that bad after all.
tk for tu juan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
war hymn aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KYQB is legit. Read that he was neck and neck with Carr while @ Notre Dame last year before Carr finally won the job.

Carr is a very solid QB as well.
RyanPearson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
phx-ag86 said:

And another W for Kentucky. Maybe the Ags aren't that bad after all.

The results against Kentucky and Mizzou beg to differ.
Indianrider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Very good team. National championship caliber? NOPE
LB12MEEN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yet the cesspool lost their ****e after we lost to them of course without letting the season play out to see what was myth and what was real.
TMF
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's true. It's amazing what a coach can do for a program. Let's see how Kentucky handles the upcoming fully guaranteed contract negotiations.
Pichael Thompson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They've got a much better coach & qb then we do


Still isn't a reason for excuse.... We're getting destroyed by anyone w a pulse
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm stuck from reading we "have an incredible coach"
pointer74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Last year lots of teams where saying the same thing about their coaching after watching A&M kick butt all season

"Amazing what a good coach can do"


Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
phx-ag86 said:

And another W for Kentucky. Maybe the Ags aren't that bad after all.


The difference is that we were not competitive at all in that game. So yes, we are very bad.
Pooh-ah95_ESL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just speculating but what I think we are starting to see is the equivalent of the dream teams in the Olympics where you take all of the superstars, but that doesn't necessarily mean that you've built a team. In fact, it often causes problems. Smarts and chemistry are very important. Bringing in a bunch of mercenary talent and having the most talented roster often won't trump culture and chemistry.. Captain obvious statement I know...
bb4js
How long do you want to ignore this user?
phx-ag86 said:

UK is for real! Another W against a tough SEC opponent.

OU is a solid team defensively, but terrible offensively. OU is a below average team at best (UK would be above average but not great).
72jag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope UK makes it to the playoffs by beating uga or bama in the SECCG.
There are still 4 teams that have never made it to the SEC CG. TAMU, Vanderbilt, OU, and Ole Miss.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.