Ok I'm up early today and have to put there that the logic on the top SEC QB's continues to baffle me. Again, I don't expect Marcel to be #1, but I'd obviously love to see him have a great 2026 and come back next year and take that spot but I'm not getting ahead of myself here. But #8 is straight up ridiculous considering every sports media person keeps putting Alabamas undecided QB ahead of Marcel along with other QB's that were injured last year or played at Marcels level (but even that is debatable) . If it's that the feel he was inconsistent is fine but obviously he overcame some of the inconsistency to still produce damn good winning season. Others were inconsistent and had a worse record and many of those haven't reloaded enough to say they will for sure be any better than A&M. If you want to call out Marcels flaws at the end I get it but to deny as a whole the season he had as whole should still put him higher. Just based on the fact that if you have a returning QB whose team had a good season, and we say QB is one of the most important pieces, and place him at 8 makes no sense. Top 5 is where he belong and I feel like will still be the case come the end of this season. It's not very bold to say "he could could be as high as 4" and you put him that low when he has plenty of games to show he's not likely to regress that much, showed a lot of growth last year, especially when you've put others who haven't matched him to this point. Maybe TexAgs will make me feel better about my rant this morning.