Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Moving goalposts- my Lord

19,237 Views | 77 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by greg.w.h
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If we're being honest, it's really difficult listening to these two try to have a debate on that podcast. Atwell is constantly trying to find gotchas and use terms like "gaslighting" to prove her points. It's not a good energy. It's exhausting and just a very hard listen all the way around. I hide these clips when they show up on X.

I'll listen to Billy and Nuno debate any day.
This one, I can't. Sorry not sorry.
WC94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DimebagsGhost said:

learn how to argue against a woman.


You know how I know you aren't married?
Pichael Thompson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't stand talking to sips myself


Why the hell would I want to listen to someone else talk to a sip?


Seems like whoever the marketing strategist is needs to rethink the product platform
85AustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did you ever just think maybe this podcast just isn't for you and its time to move on? You heard of beating a dead horse? That's this post...
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's great that Looch has people who feel very strongly about a podcast. The word of mouth is getting out!!!
AgOutsideAustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looch gonna be there for her knee replacement surgery tomorrow ??
Arachnologistguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does the OP's lord have a name?
There is only one narrative: The ETs Farsight is in contact with are the good guys. Not so regarding the faction of et OUR military is in bed with.
Liucci
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
greg.w.h said:

I think it's great that Looch has people who feel very strongly about a podcast. The word of mouth is getting out!!!


And this doesn't even compare to the loons on Twitter and what the burnt orange message boards have to say. Probsbly most of the blue stars on a couple of these replies tbh

Like I said, we have fun with it and people take it entirely too seriously (the disagreements and debates).
Rosenthalmeatz12thman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Liucci said:

greg.w.h said:

I think it's great that Looch has people who feel very strongly about a podcast. The word of mouth is getting out!!!


And this doesn't even compare to the loons on Twitter and what the burnt orange message boards have to say. Probsbly most of the blue stars on a couple of these replies tbh

Like I said, we have fun with it and people take it entirely too seriously (the disagreements and debates).
I think my rub, and others possible, who find it harder to watch, is it seems like Amanda takes it more seriously than you do. You know her better than us so correct me if im off, but it just makes it hard to listen to her when she throws some of these buzz words at you and digs her heels in, when you're very much focused on a general discussion. Then again if we can actually deliver and beat Texas this year, I'm sure that will change her tune!
Liucci
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
Rosenthalmeatz12thman said:

Liucci said:

greg.w.h said:

I think it's great that Looch has people who feel very strongly about a podcast. The word of mouth is getting out!!!


And this doesn't even compare to the loons on Twitter and what the burnt orange message boards have to say. Probsbly most of the blue stars on a couple of these replies tbh

Like I said, we have fun with it and people take it entirely too seriously (the disagreements and debates).
I think my rub, and others possible, who find it harder to watch, is it seems like Amanda takes it more seriously than you do. You know her better than us so correct me if im off, but it just makes it hard to listen to her when she throws some of these buzz words at you and digs her heels in, when you're very much focused on a general discussion. Then again if we can actually deliver and beat Texas this year, I'm sure that will change her tune!


Appreciate the feedback. While I don't think her taking it seriously is a bad thing, she does tend to dig her heels in when we're debating some of it. I need to do a better job of not letting her dig in I guess. Will be a lot easier once the season starts and the hypotheticals and pre-season hype is gone.
Rosenthalmeatz12thman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For sure. I think once we have concrete things to talk about it will get a lot better than playing these hypothetical games!
KC AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why let it rub you wrong? Simply don't listen. Find something else to do with your time.
texag101
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BuddysBud said:

waynenutt said:

Good grief. How do these folks get on this site


It's great that those running this site have the maturity and self-confidence to allow those that disagree with their opinions and those who are obviously fans of rival teams (even if they pretend to be A&M fans) to participate in conversations. The site would be much less interesting if it were just a wash of maroon Koolaide where anyone with dissenting opinions would be banned.
What you read here bears little resemblance to what gets posted and then quickly censored.
Rosenthalmeatz12thman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KC AG said:

Why let it rub you wrong? Simply don't listen. Find something else to do with your time.
it's a message board, nothing wrong with giving constructive criticism on something I'd assume he wants more ppl to view.
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rosenthalmeatz12thman said:

Liucci said:

greg.w.h said:

I think it's great that Looch has people who feel very strongly about a podcast. The word of mouth is getting out!!!


And this doesn't even compare to the loons on Twitter and what the burnt orange message boards have to say. Probsbly most of the blue stars on a couple of these replies tbh

Like I said, we have fun with it and people take it entirely too seriously (the disagreements and debates).
I think my rub, and others possible, who find it harder to watch, is it seems like Amanda takes it more seriously than you do. You know her better than us so correct me if im off, but it just makes it hard to listen to her when she throws some of these buzz words at you and digs her heels in, when you're very much focused on a general discussion. Then again if we can actually deliver and beat Texas this year, I'm sure that will change her tune!


Like many fans, she thinks stats are the end all be all. People with that world view think stats are inarguable

Take completion percentage. Many tie that directly to QB play. Other factors make an impact like pass pro, WRs that can get open, not to mention play calls. Dink and dunk passes give higher completion percentages just because of the ease of the throw.


Even a teams defense might impact completion percentage by forcing more risk to stay in the game.

Stats can offer insight but not without zooming out and looking at the bigger picture imo
Rosenthalmeatz12thman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yea better way of saying what I was getting at. Idec as much that she holds stats to such a high regard. It's more so her attitude can come off as " I won't move on until you admit my opinion is the correct one". I think she takes the name of the podcast too seriously lol.
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rosenthalmeatz12thman said:

Yea better way of saying what I was getting at. Idec as much that she holds stats to such a high regard. It's more so her attitude can come off as " I won't move on until you admit my opinion is the correct one". I think she takes the name of the podcast too seriously lol.


I think her worldview on stats is common, you might even say average

I couldn't even count the number of times I've been in a football discussion and it turns out the person I'm talking with thinks completion percentage = QB accuracy. Sure, accuracy is in there but buried in with a lot of other factors too.


The problem with talking to a pure stats person is they offer hard numbers which are quick and easy. Getting them to zoom out and look at the bigger picture is easier said than done, plus much more time consuming than their pure statistical regurgitation worldview
HorseCripplers70
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jamey said:

Rosenthalmeatz12thman said:

Liucci said:

greg.w.h said:

I think it's great that Looch has people who feel very strongly about a podcast. The word of mouth is getting out!!!


And this doesn't even compare to the loons on Twitter and what the burnt orange message boards have to say. Probsbly most of the blue stars on a couple of these replies tbh

Like I said, we have fun with it and people take it entirely too seriously (the disagreements and debates).

I think my rub, and others possible, who find it harder to watch, is it seems like Amanda takes it more seriously than you do. You know her better than us so correct me if im off, but it just makes it hard to listen to her when she throws some of these buzz words at you and digs her heels in, when you're very much focused on a general discussion. Then again if we can actually deliver and beat Texas this year, I'm sure that will change her tune!


Like many fans, she thinks stats are the end all be all. People with that world view think stats are inarguable

Take completion percentage. Many tie that directly to QB play. Other factors make an impact like pass pro, WRs that can get open, not to mention play calls. Dink and dunk passes give higher completion percentages just because of the ease of the throw.


Even a teams defense might impact completion percentage by forcing more risk to stay in the game.

Stats can offer insight but not without zooming out and looking at the bigger picture imo

Couldn't agree more, "Stats are like bikinis, they show alot but not everything." is how I've always looked at stats and I'm not sure who I stole that quote from but read it somewhere years ago.
Rosenthalmeatz12thman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I love that quote, I'm using it now
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HorseCripplers70 said:

jamey said:

Rosenthalmeatz12thman said:

Liucci said:

greg.w.h said:

I think it's great that Looch has people who feel very strongly about a podcast. The word of mouth is getting out!!!


And this doesn't even compare to the loons on Twitter and what the burnt orange message boards have to say. Probsbly most of the blue stars on a couple of these replies tbh

Like I said, we have fun with it and people take it entirely too seriously (the disagreements and debates).

I think my rub, and others possible, who find it harder to watch, is it seems like Amanda takes it more seriously than you do. You know her better than us so correct me if im off, but it just makes it hard to listen to her when she throws some of these buzz words at you and digs her heels in, when you're very much focused on a general discussion. Then again if we can actually deliver and beat Texas this year, I'm sure that will change her tune!


Like many fans, she thinks stats are the end all be all. People with that world view think stats are inarguable

Take completion percentage. Many tie that directly to QB play. Other factors make an impact like pass pro, WRs that can get open, not to mention play calls. Dink and dunk passes give higher completion percentages just because of the ease of the throw.


Even a teams defense might impact completion percentage by forcing more risk to stay in the game.

Stats can offer insight but not without zooming out and looking at the bigger picture imo

Couldn't agree more, "Stats are like bikinis, they show alot but not everything." is how I've always looked at stats and I'm not sure who I stole that quote from but read it somewhere years ago.


Yes, great quote. Might even say the best parts are covered
Hank the Grifter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a great line.

But there's also the old classic: Lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a small sample of what I'm talking about.
Immediately equates to Arch and turns into a gotcha which was clearly not Liucci's intent in the point he was making. It was never about a comparison between QBs. And a comparison would be fine, but instead Atwell turns it into a smug gotcha.
I wouldn't find this watchable even if it were the other way around. Incredibly offputting energy.

Liucci
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
I actually think that exchange was lighthearted and not intended to be anything but funny, good-natured rivalry **** talking.

Hopefully I'm right, bc those numbers - and the context is left out here which are Arch's struggles vs lesser teams - and Marcel beating two top-10 teams is accurate, I think we're talking about a QB that takes the Aggies to back to back playoffs.

Maybe she's worn me down, but I think that exchange was harmless and more comedy than anything else.
Liucci
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
You just can't let the twitter mob dictate how good or badly Andy of these go for me because it's always going to be overrun by Longhorns in my mentions so we know the result/narrative ahead of time.
KNM2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Liucci said:

You just can't let the twitter mob dictate how good or badly Andy of these go for me because it's always going to be overrun by Longhorns in my mentions so we know the result/narrative ahead of time.


I think you take it a little too easy most of the time , whether you mean it or not. And I'm not being a d*. I like listening to the show.
Blonde Coffee Beans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shes using Billy as a way to troll texags/aggies and luring them into her personal business/career adventures $$$$$$
"I don't care about your feelings OP. I'm not going to let fandom replace reason, thought, and history"
Rosenthalmeatz12thman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's my only other biggest gripe. She bites the hand that helps feed her socials. Calls Billy a friend, but I certainly wouldn't talk like that with a friend t-sip or not.
Mat Lanticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rosenthalmeatz12thman said:

That's my only other biggest gripe. She bites the hand that helps feed her socials. Calls Billy a friend, but I certainly wouldn't talk like that with a friend t-sip or not.
are you gonna sit there and tell me women will say one thing and do another?

Next thing you know you'll be telling me they poop and fart too!
Rosenthalmeatz12thman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mat Lanticus said:

Rosenthalmeatz12thman said:

That's my only other biggest gripe. She bites the hand that helps feed her socials. Calls Billy a friend, but I certainly wouldn't talk like that with a friend t-sip or not.
are you gonna sit there and tell me women will say one thing and do another?

Next thing you know you'll be telling me they poop and fart too!
Ghost of Bisbee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think I'm just meant to watch you and Nuno debate at this point lol

I really like Nuno's interviews with Pate and Peter Burns during the season btw.
Blonde Coffee Beans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ghost of Bisbee said:

This is a small sample of what I'm talking about.
Immediately equates to Arch and turns into a gotcha which was clearly not Liucci's intent in the point he was making. It was never about a comparison between QBs. And a comparison would be fine, but instead Atwell turns it into a smug gotcha.
I wouldn't find this watchable even if it were the other way around. Incredibly offputting energy.




I cant fathom why she decorated her kitchen like that
"I don't care about your feelings OP. I'm not going to let fandom replace reason, thought, and history"
twelve12twelve
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rosenthalmeatz12thman said:

KC AG said:

Why let it rub you wrong? Simply don't listen. Find something else to do with your time.

it's a message board, nothing wrong with giving constructive criticism on something I'd assume he wants more ppl to view.

Nothing about this post was constructive. Just *****ing to *****.
Rosenthalmeatz12thman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
twelve12twelve said:

Rosenthalmeatz12thman said:

KC AG said:

Why let it rub you wrong? Simply don't listen. Find something else to do with your time.

it's a message board, nothing wrong with giving constructive criticism on something I'd assume he wants more ppl to view.

Nothing about this post was constructive. Just *****ing to *****.
Billy literally thanked me for my feedback about his part in directing the conversation. Just a jackass to be a jackass more like
Aggie9979
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Liucci said:

I actually think that exchange was lighthearted and not intended to be anything but funny, good-natured rivalry **** talking.

Hopefully I'm right, bc those numbers - and the context is left out here which are Arch's struggles vs lesser teams - and Marcel beating two top-10 teams is accurate, I think we're talking about a QB that takes the Aggies to back to back playoffs.

Maybe she's worn me down, but I think that exchange was harmless and more comedy than anything else.

Maybe I'm just speaking for myself, but I don't think the issue is that people are opposed to rivalry banter or even sh** talking. It's what we all do frankly.

The problem is that Amanda is just not a likeable person and seems to take the wrong tone in almost all of your conversations. I think many in the media are very good at this type of dialogue (we see it all the time from SEC Network folks, other online media, etc) but she has a strange smugness that make it hard to enjoy in any way.

I don't have any problem saying Texas beat us, outplayed us, and outcoached us (and frankly has just been the better program) the last 2-3 years, but it's not enjoyable media when she won't even debate in good faith on topics that are relevant.

It's easy to say "just don't watch it" (which i don't), but clips from the podcast show up on my X.com timeline all the time and pretty much all of it is negative on A&M.

Just my $0.02 - if other people enjoy it, great for them
Rosenthalmeatz12thman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yea this on top of what I was saying. Definitely an attitude and heel digging that wouldn't fly if she was doin this with anyone else but Billy.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.