Bunk Moreland said:Logos Stick said:
Then throw the ball away, check down or run.
Easy for you to say. We couldn't run for ***** Miami could. And he still outplayed Beck imo.
Dead wrong. Beck sucked less and they won!
Bunk Moreland said:Logos Stick said:
Then throw the ball away, check down or run.
Easy for you to say. We couldn't run for ***** Miami could. And he still outplayed Beck imo.
Wabs said:Artorias said:
TO3 was a terrible pass way behind the receiver. A good pass was a TD there.
And he didn't HAVE TO try and jam a ball in there. It was 3rd down so we had a play left. He played it like it was do or die. Horrible decision and throw.
aggieland09 said:Bunk Moreland said:Logos Stick said:
Then throw the ball away, check down or run.
Easy for you to say. We couldn't run for ***** Miami could. And he still outplayed Beck imo.
Dead wrong. Beck sucked less and they won!
AWP 97 said:
We cannot go into next season with Reed and Owens as our starters. We need to upgrade those two positions significantly.
Bunk Moreland said:Logos Stick said:
Then throw the ball away, check down or run.
Easy for you to say. We couldn't run for ***** Miami could. And he still outplayed Beck imo.
Logos Stick said:Bunk Moreland said:Logos Stick said:
Then throw the ball away, check down or run.
Easy for you to say. We couldn't run for ***** Miami could. And he still outplayed Beck imo.
So he had no open receivers and taking the sack is justified because it's not easy to scramble, throw it away or toss to a check down??
Beck didn't throw an INT in the end zone to lose the game for his team. Marcel did. Beck did what he needed to do to win. Marcel didn't. In no world did Marcel outplay Beck.
5 Dollar Footlong said:
Seriously, who really gaf how Marcel played compared to Beck? The bottom line is that Reed played a terrible game. Whatever you want to say about the OL (sucked), they gave him plenty of opportunities to make plays and he couldn't get it done.
Rarely did he put the ball in a place where a receiver could do anything with it, that's if he got it to them at all. Both the interceptions were 100% on him with bad reads and throws and it seemed obvious to me that he knew he couldn't drive the ball downfield to the middle so he kept checking down to short sideline passes.
When you want to be the QB with the attention, the hype, the adulation and now the money you have to be able to put the offense on your back and carry the team. Reed wasn't up to the task. Full stop.
Heineken-Ashi said:AWP 97 said:
We cannot go into next season with Reed and Owens as our starters. We need to upgrade those two positions significantly.
I remember people saying Reed couldn't improve after last season.
You were wrong, and likely will be again.
FriendlyAg said:
our O line was never good. Some good players, but the unit wasn't good. We couldn't run most of the year unless the other team was tired.
Heineken-Ashi said:5 Dollar Footlong said:
Seriously, who really gaf how Marcel played compared to Beck? The bottom line is that Reed played a terrible game. Whatever you want to say about the OL (sucked), they gave him plenty of opportunities to make plays and he couldn't get it done.
Rarely did he put the ball in a place where a receiver could do anything with it, that's if he got it to them at all. Both the interceptions were 100% on him with bad reads and throws and it seemed obvious to me that he knew he couldn't drive the ball downfield to the middle so he kept checking down to short sideline passes.
When you want to be the QB with the attention, the hype, the adulation and now the money you have to be able to put the offense on your back and carry the team. Reed wasn't up to the task. Full stop.
He failed yesterday. The point of the comparison is that yesterday's conditions were setup poorly for strong passing teams. One team adapted. The other kept trying to fit the round peg in a square hole.
5 Dollar Footlong said:Heineken-Ashi said:5 Dollar Footlong said:
Seriously, who really gaf how Marcel played compared to Beck? The bottom line is that Reed played a terrible game. Whatever you want to say about the OL (sucked), they gave him plenty of opportunities to make plays and he couldn't get it done.
Rarely did he put the ball in a place where a receiver could do anything with it, that's if he got it to them at all. Both the interceptions were 100% on him with bad reads and throws and it seemed obvious to me that he knew he couldn't drive the ball downfield to the middle so he kept checking down to short sideline passes.
When you want to be the QB with the attention, the hype, the adulation and now the money you have to be able to put the offense on your back and carry the team. Reed wasn't up to the task. Full stop.
He failed yesterday. The point of the comparison is that yesterday's conditions were setup poorly for strong passing teams. One team adapted. The other kept trying to fit the round peg in a square hole.
If you say so. From my perspective one team didn't adapt. One team, one time was able to take advantage of the singular weakness of our defense we never addressed. Otherwise we largely shut them down the entire game.
Which of course makes our total offensive ineptitude even more frustrating.
Bunk Moreland said:juanyfutbol said:
In all fairness, Reed literally walked into some of those sacks or held on to the ball too long.
In all fairness there wasn't a person open because they were only rushing 4 and dropping 7. Every single replay from behind the offense I didn't see anyone he could have thrown to.