This is great news and something to get excited about. At least Elko is admitting it was a bad hire, something that Fisher could never do.
Hearing a rumor that y'all may love
22,340 Views |
74 Replies |
Last: 7 days ago by Justice Beaver
Heisenberg01 said:Ol Rock said:
Our defense wasn't the problem. The defense scored a TD and almost another vs the sips. Our Offense was terrible for long stretches.
Ok, now do the Auburn, South Carolina, and USC games.
Exactly. Those 3 losses are more alarming than the Texas one.
That could be said for others in addition to the DC.QB1 said:
What concerns me most is elko brought him in and then canned him after one year? Not looking good for coaching talent evals
Not necessarily. We have no idea what the other options were.texag101 said:
Bad news. Good news. Bad news is Elko made a bad hire. Good news is he's willing to acknowledge it and be proactive about fixing it.
Whoever we hire will be "an ace recruiter and an amazing defensive coordinator". Then in a year he'll be "junk and overrated"
Rinse and repeat
Rinse and repeat
Can the next guy coach the line to set an edge and stop crashing down on the back side? Zero gap integrity all year long. All the running back had to do was start play side then cut back. 10+ yards almost every time. It was frustrating to watch.
texag101 said:
Bad news. Good news. Bad news is Elko made a bad hire. Good news is he's willing to acknowledge it and be proactive about fixing it.
Here comes the new boss, same as the old boss.
Great coaches don't make bad hires and they certainly don't knowingly settle for one.
I'm sure somehow this will all turnout great.
Bateman nearly got fired at Florida a year ago. Nobody was happy with him.Hill08 said:
Whoever we hire will be "an ace recruiter and an amazing defensive coordinator". Then in a year he'll be "junk and overrated"
Rinse and repeat
So is this a done deal or what?
Liucci has an update thread on Bateman on Premium. I figured if something was official it would have leaked by now.
Liucci has an update thread on Bateman on Premium. I figured if something was official it would have leaked by now.
Ol Rock said:
Our defense wasn't the problem. The defense scored a TD and almost another vs the sips. Our Offense was terrible for long stretches.
The defense was a trainwreck. Bateman coached tackling and cover skills out of the players. And, overall the D had more talent than the O.
It is inexcusable that the dline didn't have more sacks. There was a lot of talent to make it happen.
Pair that with LBs and a secondary often out of position and making an insane number of embarrassing whiffs on tackles and it's obvious that Bateman had to be forced out.
Our defense was dominated by the sips. Our offense is just more of a dumpster fire.Ol Rock said:
Our defense wasn't the problem. The defense scored a TD and almost another vs the sips. Our Offense was terrible for long stretches.
lol. What's that based on? Nobody thought Durkin or Bateman were going to be great when they were hired. Our last real DC who was expected to be good to begin with was Elko. You follow our football program?Hill08 said:
Whoever we hire will be "an ace recruiter and an amazing defensive coordinator". Then in a year he'll be "junk and overrated"
Rinse and repeat
Ag1188 said:Our defense was dominated by the sips. Our offense is just more of a dumpster fire.Ol Rock said:
Our defense wasn't the problem. The defense scored a TD and almost another vs the sips. Our Offense was terrible for long stretches.
Dramatic much?
Ol Rock said:
Our defense wasn't the problem. The defense scored a TD and almost another vs the sips. Our Offense was terrible for long stretches.
When the defense was the problem... it was a PROBLEM. Couldn't tackle against USCe, and gave up big plays against USCw. Then the defense made Auburn look all world
The offense was pedestrian once the opposing defense found the formula on how to shut down Reed/Klein. When it was Weigman/Reed/Klein, it was harder to game plan for
I fear if nothing changes on offense in 2025 and the opposing defenses will shut us down now that it's a single QB system. We seem to be very predictable on offense and that's on Klein/Elko
TLDR
This team and staff have a lot of weaknesses
We need to generate more NFL draft picks across the roster.
Continuing to produce only 3-ish per year is gonna keep us around the same 8 and 4-ish every year.
Comparatively, the contenders put in around 10-ish, if not more.
Continuing to produce only 3-ish per year is gonna keep us around the same 8 and 4-ish every year.
Comparatively, the contenders put in around 10-ish, if not more.
Looks like he's staying
World's worst proofreader
Yeah saw a tweet that says VT is bringing in someone from the AZ Cardinals to be their DC.
Stuck with Bateman.
Stuck with Bateman.
Bateman putting his name out there to get a raise. There was no way that VT was going to match his salary.
TxAg76 said:
We need to generate more NFL draft picks across the roster.
Continuing to produce only 3-ish per year is gonna keep us around the same 8 and 4-ish every year.
Comparatively, the contenders put in around 10-ish, if not more.
Wait, are you saying it's not 100% coaching?
Positive is Elko will be the play caller on defense next year and we are getting help for our secondary. Plus apparently Bateman is a very good recruiter.
Negative is Bateman is still coaching
Negative is Bateman is still coaching
World's worst proofreader
Timberwolf
Joined:
Feb 4, 2004
Posts:
4,571
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now, that's more the A&M character I recall!
cevans_40 said:TxAg76 said:
We need to generate more NFL draft picks across the roster.
Continuing to produce only 3-ish per year is gonna keep us around the same 8 and 4-ish every year.
Comparatively, the contenders put in around 10-ish, if not more.
Wait, are you saying it's not 100% coaching?
That's exactly what I'm saying (plus I sense your sarcasm)
Mules and quarter horses are damn good work animals, but if youre really serious about trying to win the Kentucky Derby, you're gonna need something different.
TxAg76 said:cevans_40 said:TxAg76 said:
We need to generate more NFL draft picks across the roster.
Continuing to produce only 3-ish per year is gonna keep us around the same 8 and 4-ish every year.
Comparatively, the contenders put in around 10-ish, if not more.
Wait, are you saying it's not 100% coaching?
That's exactly what I'm saying (plus I sense your sarcasm)
Mules and quarter horses are damn good work animals, but if youre really serious about trying to win the Kentucky Derby, you're gonna need something different.
You also need a jockey that's not super fat
TxAg76 said:cevans_40 said:TxAg76 said:
We need to generate more NFL draft picks across the roster.
Continuing to produce only 3-ish per year is gonna keep us around the same 8 and 4-ish every year.
Comparatively, the contenders put in around 10-ish, if not more.
Wait, are you saying it's not 100% coaching?
That's exactly what I'm saying (plus I sense your sarcasm)
Mules and quarter horses are damn good work animals, but if youre really serious about trying to win the Kentucky Derby, you're gonna need something different.
Yeah but Jimbo proved that you could have a stable full of Secretariats and it won't matter if your jockey is Sancho Panza.
Maybe, but nobody wanted Bateman when he was hired here.Hill08 said:
Whoever we hire will be "an ace recruiter and an amazing defensive coordinator". Then in a year he'll be "junk and overrated"
Rinse and repeat
Hank the Grifter said:TxAg76 said:cevans_40 said:TxAg76 said:
We need to generate more NFL draft picks across the roster.
Continuing to produce only 3-ish per year is gonna keep us around the same 8 and 4-ish every year.
Comparatively, the contenders put in around 10-ish, if not more.
Wait, are you saying it's not 100% coaching?
That's exactly what I'm saying (plus I sense your sarcasm)
Mules and quarter horses are damn good work animals, but if youre really serious about trying to win the Kentucky Derby, you're gonna need something different.
Yeah but Jimbo proved that you could have a stable full of Secretariats and it won't matter if your jockey is Sancho Panza.
We never had a stable full of Secretariats. Our NFL Draft counts prove that.
We've never even had a stable full of thoroughbreds, period, but we've had a few good race horses sprinkled here and there on occasion. Never a stable full.
Best we had with Jimbo was a couple years of some Seabiscuits, maybe.
You know, the crazy F'd up version before they taught him how to be a horse again.
Can he take Klein with him
Our defense scored a TD on a pass play but couldn't stop the run to save their lives! Offense wasn't great but we can at least attribute some of that to talent level and tu having a solid defense themselves. I was at the game and it was excruciating to watch them run it on us over and over and over. Ewers handling the ball was our only shot to get back in the game.Ol Rock said:
Our defense wasn't the problem. The defense scored a TD and almost another vs the sips. Our Offense was terrible for long stretches.
When you consider the talent we have on the DL, that is INEXCUSABLE!
Ag1188 said:Our defense was dominated by the sips. Our offense is just more of a dumpster fire.Ol Rock said:
Our defense wasn't the problem. The defense scored a TD and almost another vs the sips. Our Offense was terrible for long stretches.
****ing terrible take. There are plenty of reasons to complain about our defense, but the Texas game is not one of them. They averaged over 28 PPG against P4 teams and we held them to 17 which not only is NOT getting dominated, it puts us with Georgia and Ohio State as the only teams to hold Texas to less than 20 points.
If anything, the Texas game was a bright spot for the defense.
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.” -Abraham Lincoln
“Veganism is like communism. They’re both fine… unless you like food.”
“Veganism is like communism. They’re both fine… unless you like food.”
A raise?Ag_EE_88 said:
Bateman putting his name out there to get a raise. There was no way that VT was going to match his salary.
Who the hell is a raise coming from? Better damn sure not be us after that crap show this year.
I invite some other school to please, give him a raise
I don't recall a whole lot of cheers and cartwheels when he was announcedArtorias said:Maybe, but nobody wanted Bateman when he was hired here.Hill08 said:
Whoever we hire will be "an ace recruiter and an amazing defensive coordinator". Then in a year he'll be "junk and overrated"
Rinse and repeat
Not sure I'd consider letting a single RB go for damn near 200 against you on your home field much of a "bright spot"Quote:
If anything, the Texas game was a bright spot for the defense.
All those yards are irrelevant if they don't translate into points.
Just looking at PPG against P4 competition, the defense had their second best performance of the season against Texas. Only Missouri managed to score fewer points. Hell, the defense let Bowling Green score more points than Texas. So yeah, definitely a bright spot.
Just looking at PPG against P4 competition, the defense had their second best performance of the season against Texas. Only Missouri managed to score fewer points. Hell, the defense let Bowling Green score more points than Texas. So yeah, definitely a bright spot.
“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.” -Abraham Lincoln
“Veganism is like communism. They’re both fine… unless you like food.”
“Veganism is like communism. They’re both fine… unless you like food.”
vander54 said:
Positive is Elko will be the play caller on defense next year and we are getting help for our secondary. Plus apparently Bateman is a very good recruiter.
Negative is Bateman is still coaching
So, why not just fire him? According to you we're now paying him his DC salary to only recruit…seems like a huge waste of money…How is that a positive?
Featured Stories
See All
Top-ranked Texas A&M picked to win SEC in preseason coaches poll
by Richard Zane
12:54
1d ago
6.0k
11:59
58m ago
471
Offering a behind-the-scenes a look at February signees of the past
by Ryan Brauninger