soleta27 said:

---

If there is actual merit to these rumors, then this is drama that you don't want from a guy in your program. Tceh warned us about him and funny how quickly they'll take him back with open arms

---

About as quickly as all the people here will tell you we really don't need him and he's not that good after all

cupcakesprinkles said:

---

So it wasn't for mental health issues like we were told?

---

Looks like a very firm no

My guess is if you sat this kid down and asked him what's going on he probably couldn't explain it himself. So all of these stories that pretend to understand what's going on his head are pretty funny.

1876er said:

---

Let me guess, the same people that said he was a huge upgrade will now say we didn't need him.

---

My question is who is responsible for checking these guys out? We've already dealt with head cases and guys who cause problems

rootube said:

---

My guess is if you sat this kid down and asked him what's going on he probably couldn't explain it himself. So all of these stories that pretend to understand what's going on his head are pretty funny.

---

A Tech buddy of mine (insert joke here) said Hudson's not a very smart guy and that he couldn't grasp the offense. Of course, he's probably giddy now that Hudson's likely to remain in Lubbock.

TxAg76 said:

---

texag101 said:

---

TxAg76 said:

---

Bill Superman said:

---

texag101 said:

---

So were we lied to about his "mental health" issue and the dust up between him and Reed?

---

Dust up between him and Reed?..

---

---

Yes, the rumor is he got in a fight (whether physical or verbal) with Reed, which could have been over his reluctance to participate in voluntary workouts. That led to him leaving the team, which was excused as a departure for mental health reasons. I have no idea what's true. If you didn't hear about it, it's not because it wasn't here, at least briefly, if you know what I mean. It's all over other places. That said, I think the rumors about the mental health issue were allowed to stay here.

---

If true, adios.
The great ones didn't become great by smoking dope, sitting on the couch, and dry humping their bank accounts.

---

smoking dope Lol. Nobody needs weed more than you, weirdo.

Ag1188 said:

---

TxAg76 said:

---

texag101 said:

---

TxAg76 said:

---

Bill Superman said:

---

texag101 said:

---

So were we lied to about his "mental health" issue and the dust up between him and Reed?

---

Dust up between him and Reed?..

---

---

Yes, the rumor is he got in a fight (whether physical or verbal) with Reed, which could have been over his reluctance to participate in voluntary workouts. That led to him leaving the team, which was excused as a departure for mental health reasons. I have no idea what's true. If you didn't hear about it, it's not because it wasn't here, at least briefly, if you know what I mean. It's all over other places. That said, I think the rumors about the mental health issue were allowed to stay here.

---

If true, adios.
The great ones didn't become great by smoking dope, sitting on the couch, and dry humping their bank accounts.

---

smoking dope Lol. Nobody needs weed more than you, weirdo.

---

Hell, i enjoy weed on occasion.
But there's a time and a place for everything.

Chris Level on Micah Hudson: "Don't rule out a return."
"It's complicated"

— Flatland Sports🌵 (@flatland_sports) January 23, 2025

LouisHerbertWong said:

---

rootube said:

---

My guess is if you sat this kid down and asked him what's going on he probably couldn't explain it himself. So all of these stories that pretend to understand what's going on his head are pretty funny.

---

A Tech buddy of mine (insert joke here) said Hudson's not a very smart guy and that he couldn't grasp the offense. Of course, he's probably giddy now that Hudson's likely to remain in Lubbock.

---

Serious question, why would a 5* go to tech in this day of NIL? A big red flag.

Farmer_J said:

---

LouisHerbertWong said:

---

rootube said:

---

My guess is if you sat this kid down and asked him what's going on he probably couldn't explain it himself. So all of these stories that pretend to understand what's going on his head are pretty funny.

---

A Tech buddy of mine (insert joke here) said Hudson's not a very smart guy and that he couldn't grasp the offense. Of course, he's probably giddy now that Hudson's likely to remain in Lubbock.

---

Serious question, why would a 5* go to tech in this day of NIL? A big red flag.

---

hudson went to tech more of him being a legacy there but tech has a lot to offer with football facilities, top notch NIL, a little bit of success with joey. It's not the same old tech anymore sadly

This is the exact day and age people would go to tech.. or any other Texas school that doesn't win. They'll tolerate your school as long you shower them with money. Dudes apparently love dropping stupid amounts of money on contracts that don't have a performance guarantees. There are some people smart enough to know they might not be as good as their ranking says and college NIL will be their best bet for a decent lump sum to start real life with after CFB ends.

Define more success.

DTuba said:

---

Define more success.

---

well with a program like tech. Hitting 9 then 8 then 8 wins again is an improvement from where they were averaging 6 ish

LouisHerbertWong said:

---

A Tech buddy of mine (insert joke here) said Hudson's not a very smart guy and that he couldn't grasp the offense. Of course, he's probably giddy now that Hudson's likely to remain in Lubbock.

---

Highly doubtful. I think most Tech fans don't want anything to do with this circus. If there's any truth to what's going on, then obviously someone kept the lines of communication open, but general sentiment is meh.

I'd love to make a bet. I bet Reed has a more successful college career than Hudson.

Pepe SiIvia said:

---

This is the exact day and age people would go to tech.. or any other Texas school that doesn't win. They'll tolerate your school as long you shower them with money. Dudes apparently love dropping stupid amounts of money on contracts that don't have a performance guarantees. There are some people smart enough to know they might not be as good as their ranking says and college NIL will be their best bet for a decent lump sum to start real life with after CFB ends.

---

Tye performance guarantee by state law cannot include on field performance…

agchugger said:

---

beerad12man said:

---

once again, this board is wrong.

Hudson doesn't have Reed's work ethic. That's pretty obvious reading the tea leaves. But no physical fight occurred from the best of what people can gather. (or Concepcion or anyone in our WR room's work ethic for that matter).

Funny you guys immediately start to talk about it's because of our passing game, because KC Concepcion got here and immediately thought damn, this Reed kid can pass. He straight up said the narrative he was fed was clearly wrong from his own eyes.

But nevermind that. It's all doom and gloom here. No WR will ever want to come here, and Hudson immediately saw our QB and passing game and left. Yep, that's totally the reason. You guys have it nailed again.

---

beerad always gonna beerad. The narrative is ALWAYS favorable for A&M and there is NEVER any bad news.

---

Thank you captain obvious! I needed someone to quote my post and tell me something I already knew.

Double Diamond said:

---

I couldn't care less. This is a run first coordinator.

---

Who's oline can't get a yard when it matters the most

BraxtonW said:

---

Chris Level on Micah Hudson: "Don't rule out a return."
"It's complicated"

— Flatland Sports🌵 (@flatland_sports) January 23, 2025

---

You know what?

It's not THAT complicated.

And if it is, maybe we should cut bait.

The biggest issue is that we were sub-par at WR last year. Now we have lost Thomas, Barber, and Walker from the roster, probably our 3 best WRs last year. Do we expect to be better next year with what we have on the roster now? Do we need to do some major tampering in the spring?

This roster has a lot of issues, but WR remains one.

I always have hope that one of the FR or RSF surprises and fills a need.

4 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Chris Level on Micah Hudson: "Don't rule out a return."
"It's complicated"

— Flatland Sports🌵 (@flatland_sports) January 23, 2025

---

You know what?

It's not THAT complicated.

And if it is, maybe we should cut bait.

---

Yeah I'm tired of this. Either in the boat or not. Really feel like if he enters again and tech doesn't want him back, he might have a hard time finding a place.

Kozmozag said:

---

Did he pull a Dickerson? We paid him and he took the money and went back to tech....lol

---

Not likely. Even with NIL, there are definitely stipulations in getting the money

wangus12 said:

---

Kozmozag said:

---

Did he pull a Dickerson? We paid him and he took the money and went back to tech....lol

---

Not likely. Even with NIL, there are definitely stipulations in getting the money

---

Correct. These are typically contracts when it comes to 10s of thousands or millions of dollars. He didnt get anything until he fulfills his obligation in the contract

Dude has primadonna written all over him

Move on & roll w who we got

Staff please lock this thread.

misterguinness said:

---

Hill08 said:

---

F2Aggie said:

---

Assuming he is back at tech. We have no Micah and also lost Noah.
I guess less is more in this instance?

---

As I stated many times, why would ANY WR come to A&M?

---

Exactly. We should just run the triple option.

---

with the RPO offense added on, we can have the sextuplet option built off the triple option.
how very exciting!
(see what I did there?)

lol what's the narrative?

SBISA Victim said:

---

If it were true Looch and other Aggie media would be reporting it as well.

---

You serious? Looch almost always never reports on potential bad news for the Aggies until after the fact, and for good reason.

give all his snaps to Myles