This is what happens. We TOLD you. They got away with holding, targeting, everything all year long. They pay the refs. We ****ing told you.
To the rest of the SEC for letting in tu
13,104 Views |
73 Replies |
Last: 23 hrs ago by oldschool87
What are we complaining about? Targeting?
To the "fans" on this site who were all giddy….
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
It's been in the works since the Pac 12 deal fell thru. Throw on an alumni who has his eyes set on winning governor for this state, an unproven name getting recruited, and who knows what else.
Just watch it all unfold. No one cares what we warned them about. It will be forgotten in a week.
Just watch it all unfold. No one cares what we warned them about. It will be forgotten in a week.
You just have to laugh at this point.
No going back
tu was on its death bed just a year or three ago (rotting in the BDF) and we thought it would be great to play them again.
Aggie jokes do indeed write themselves.
100 year dec………… 10 year decision.
Now that they have tu, the SEC gives ZERO craps about us.
No going back
tu was on its death bed just a year or three ago (rotting in the BDF) and we thought it would be great to play them again.
Aggie jokes do indeed write themselves.
100 year dec………… 10 year decision.
Now that they have tu, the SEC gives ZERO craps about us.
We always complain when things don't go our way. Instead of complaining about the refs, we should concentrate on how this game was way closer than expected and Texas did not look great. They still won, but if they play like that in the next game they will lose. That is what we should be talking about rather than the refs.HJack20 said:
What are we complaining about? Targeting?
zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
100%. YOU DO NOT let a guy get behind you in that situation.
Terrible call by their DC. Before that snapped, I was telling my family they'd go for the EZ. And what does ASU do, an obvious blitz that is stuffed at the LOS. Such a bad call.zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
dreyOO said:Terrible call by their DC. Before that snapped, I was telling my family they'd go for the EZ. And what does ASU do, an obvious blitz that is stuffed at the LOS. Such a bad call.zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
Yep. As soon as I saw them crowd the Los with 8, I knew they had an easy TD. You don't need to bring the house with a long distance to gain. So stupid there
dreyOO said:Terrible call by their DC. Before that snapped, I was telling my family they'd go for the EZ. And what does ASU do, an obvious blitz that is stuffed at the LOS. Such a bad call.zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
Not only that, the S has 1 job. NOBODY gets behind you. Looked like an Aggie S.
Ronnie '88
That was all part of the script.zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
Agreed. But that doesn't change the fact the calls were completely one sided. Hell they even tried to overturn calls on the field in favor of tu.
Wait, isn't this good for the SEC?
Ranting to the wrong people? I mean it's not like any TexAgs members had any decision-making ability on this. Nor arguably any institution singly.
Texas was always going to be admitted when they asked for membership for one reason: dollars.
Texas was always going to be admitted when they asked for membership for one reason: dollars.
FJB said:
To the "fans" on this site who were all giddy….
How about those trolling us that said "leave the SEC, go to the Big Ten"
The people making decisions at A&M only care about money and their careers. It was clearly evident when they rolled over so easily with letting t.u into the SEC
No fight whatsoever
blacksox said:
Wait, isn't this good for the SEC?
Your posting history is very suspect
zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
Refs probably would have manufactured a irbalty against asu if they get the stop there
There'd be a defensive hold or pi thats would have been called to keep the sips alive
There's only one problem with your assessment.........
Nobody from the pre-expansion SEC is getting even ONE more $$ than they weren't already getting or going to be getting. The only "SEC" teams to see a massive increase in their revenues are cow and OU, to bring them up to even standard with all the other SEC teams. No other SEC teams are getting increased revenues for cow and OU joining the SEC, none, not one penny.
Now, the maybe could change if we go to 9 conference games and Disney/ABC/ESPN decides to pay more $$; but they have already said they are not going to whether we stay at 8 or 9 conference games, they will not renegotiate the contract. They have no incentive to pay more
We couldn't solely block the expansion and them joining, my question was always why would Arkansas and Mizzou not want to block it for competitive and historical reasons and State and Vandy for competitive reasons also. That should have been a block of 4 no votes along with aTm to have 5 no votes total to block it.
The rest just all blindly voted yes assuming it was going to mean more $$$ in their coffers, they didn't read the fine print or understand that the only additional $$$ was going to cow and OU, not Bama/UT/lsu/UGA/FL, etc.
Nobody from the pre-expansion SEC is getting even ONE more $$ than they weren't already getting or going to be getting. The only "SEC" teams to see a massive increase in their revenues are cow and OU, to bring them up to even standard with all the other SEC teams. No other SEC teams are getting increased revenues for cow and OU joining the SEC, none, not one penny.
Now, the maybe could change if we go to 9 conference games and Disney/ABC/ESPN decides to pay more $$; but they have already said they are not going to whether we stay at 8 or 9 conference games, they will not renegotiate the contract. They have no incentive to pay more
We couldn't solely block the expansion and them joining, my question was always why would Arkansas and Mizzou not want to block it for competitive and historical reasons and State and Vandy for competitive reasons also. That should have been a block of 4 no votes along with aTm to have 5 no votes total to block it.
The rest just all blindly voted yes assuming it was going to mean more $$$ in their coffers, they didn't read the fine print or understand that the only additional $$$ was going to cow and OU, not Bama/UT/lsu/UGA/FL, etc.
ESiPN already defending the targeting non call "even if it WAS targeting, who's to say ASU would win?".
Nevermind it would have been a fresh set of downs inside the 35. GMAFB
Nevermind it would have been a fresh set of downs inside the 35. GMAFB
Quote:
Nobody from the pre-expansion SEC is getting even ONE more $$ than they weren't already getting or going to be getting. The only "SEC" teams to see a massive increase in their revenues are cow and OU, to bring them up to even standard with all the other SEC teams. No other SEC teams are getting increased revenues for cow and OU joining the SEC, none, not one penny.
The next contract will be higher surely and definitely the value of Texas/OU will be factored into the bid. Without a lot of research and typing tonight on my part, ESPN essentially helped facilitate Texas' movement to the SEC with transactions involving the Longhorn Network and the new Big 12 contacts. They would not have done this if they did not see an opportunity to profit along with their SEC conference partners.
Quote:
Now, the maybe could change if we go to 9 conference games and Disney/ABC/ESPN decides to pay more $$; but they have already said they are not going to whether we stay at 8 or 9 conference games, they will not renegotiate the contract. They have no incentive to pay more
My contention is not based on a renegotiation of the current contract, but the NEW one when the current one in effect expires. I assert the Horns and Sooners will add value then.
Quote:
We couldn't solely block the expansion and them joining, my question was always why would Arkansas and Mizzou not want to block it for competitive and historical reasons and State and Vandy for competitive reasons also. That should have been a block of 4 no votes along with aTm to have 5 no votes total to block it.
The rest just all blindly voted yes assuming it was going to mean more $$$ in their coffers, they didn't read the fine print or understand that the only additional $$$ was going to cow and OU, not Bama/UT/lsu/UGA/FL, etc.
I think most of the SEC university presidents simply followed the vision that a consolidation was coming and it was far better to get two huge brands in Texas and Oklahoma to join the SEC than let the Big 10 acquire them. Also you might not believe that Texas is a valuable commodity, but others do, including people like Greg Sankey.
I blame bowtie for not demanding it in writing.
And to Florida and USC, F you if your rivals want to join.
And to Florida and USC, F you if your rivals want to join.
riverrataggie said:zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
Agreed. But that doesn't change the fact the calls were completely one sided. Hell they even tried to overturn calls on the field in favor of tu.
Not even close. Targeting on ASU INT was every bit the foul that was not called on texas safety.
Skattebo OT TD was a foul on their OL. You cannot pull someone forward like that.
oh you goofy little Sip his/him. The targeting by Sips was obvious as it was head-to-head. The one against the Texas WR was clearly not one as the DB was literally turned backwards and didn't hit helmet first. And ASU owned your overrated Sip dorks in yardage all day long. Now go figure out what a woman is in Austin.OBJTEX said:riverrataggie said:zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
Agreed. But that doesn't change the fact the calls were completely one sided. Hell they even tried to overturn calls on the field in favor of tu.
Not even close. Targeting on ASU INT was every bit the foul that was not called on texas safety.
Skattebo OT TD was a foul on their OL. You cannot pull someone forward like that.
Ag1188 said:oh you goofy little Sip his/him. The targeting by Sips was obvious as it was head-to-head. The one against the Texas WR was clearly not one as the DB was literally turned backwards and didn't hit helmet first. And ASU owned your overrated Sip dorks in yardage all day long. Now go figure out what a woman is in Austin.OBJTEX said:riverrataggie said:zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
Agreed. But that doesn't change the fact the calls were completely one sided. Hell they even tried to overturn calls on the field in favor of tu.
Not even close. Targeting on ASU INT was every bit the foul that was not called on texas safety.
Skattebo OT TD was a foul on their OL. You cannot pull someone forward like that.
It's the reverse of the SEC championship game where Texas owned Georgia in yardage but the Dawgs won in OT.
Definitely better to be on the higher points side.
maxag42 said:
This is what happens. We TOLD you. They got away with holding, targeting, everything all year long. They pay the refs. We ****ing told you.
Told who? The SEC?
The SEC is thrilled that they added a team that has won them 2 playoff games. Not to mention the eyeballs and $$$.
Unfortunately, if we told the SEC to boot tu (or stop favoring them) or we leave... they'd show us the door in a heartbeat.
We need a compilation video of all the times sip had favorable targeting calls, whether it be when they got no calls for targeting, or had bull**** calls that their opponents targeted them. The dice only rolls one way.
We should honestly not be focusing on them at all.
I'll startCromagnum said:
We need a compilation video of all the times sip had favorable targeting calls, whether it be when they got no calls for targeting, or had bull**** calls that their opponents targeted them. The dice only rolls one way.
The entire foundation of sip football is cheating. Media has been paid off too.
deer corn said:
It's been in the works since the Pac 12 deal fell thru. Throw on an alumni who has his eyes set on winning governor for this state, an unproven name getting recruited, and who knows what else.
Just watch it all unfold. No one cares what we warned them about. It will be forgotten in a week.
Just think. Texas could have gone toe-to-toe with Arizona State every season of they had joined the PAC 10.
Texas has a good team, but they have one Achilles Heel. I know because I have watched Aggie Football do it for decades. Even when they overmatch their opponent with talent, they play down to the level of the competition. They did it against us, and they did it with ASU. They frequently did it in the Big XII.
Always has been. Always will be. It's what they do and why I'll always hate them.UltimateSuperGenius said:
The entire foundation of sip football is cheating. Media has been paid off too.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
zb008 said:
ASU shouldn't have given up a 4th and 13. If they get a stop there, they win.
Would have never been a play if the targeting call was made.
A&M is one of the most seriously NCAA sanctioned teams of all time. Bryant - bowl ban, Sherrill - bowl ban, Slocum - bowl ban, etc. Aggies project better than Democrats. The claim is also that historical blue bloods are protected yet some of the most heavily punished have been exactly those: USC, Alabama, and OU. This is just a self-pity party.UltimateSuperGenius said:
The entire foundation of sip football is cheating. Media has been paid off too.
As of 2012. Team, total years on probation, times sanctioned.
College Football (FBS) Programs That Have Been Sanctioned the Most
Note: The count includes seasons not yet completed (i.e. USC 2012-2013).
Rk School Seasons Sanctioned
1 Southern Methodist (TX) 17 7
2 Southern California 15 6
3 Auburn (AL) 11 4
4t Alabama 10 3
4t Michigan St. 10 3
4t Oklahoma 10 5
7t Colorado 9 5
7t Illinois 9 5
7t Texas A&M 9 4
7t Wisconsin 9 4
11t Arizona St. 8 4
11t California 8 3
11t Cincinnati (OH) 8 4
11t Kansas 8 4
11t Kansas St. 8 4
11t Miami (FL) 8 3
11t Oklahoma St. 8 2
11t South Carolina 8 3
19t Florida Intl 7 2
19t Houston (TX) 7 3
19t Memphis (TN) 7 3
19t Mississippi 7 3
19t Mississippi St. 7 3
19t Ohio St. 7 3
19t Texas Tech 7 3
We ended up in the right conference. Texas being here will add to Texas A&M's revenue in every sport at least every other year.
Featured Stories
See All
Keys to the Game: No. 13 Texas A&M vs. Texas
by Luke Evangelist
69:56
1d ago
5.1k
11:45
1d ago
1.4k
Scouting Report: No. 13 Texas A&M vs. Texas
by Tom Schuberth
Seersucker Ag 2011
How Do the Ags Matchup with Texas (Basketball)?…..
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
47
The Shank Ag
Fred Kerley Arrested After "Confrontation" With Police
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
35