I do not understand how that obvious favoritism is allowed.
I want the NCAA to burn.
I want the NCAA to burn.
How the F is that not targeting
18,572 Views |
151 Replies |
Last: 1 mo ago by classof92
To the mother f-ing ground. So ridiculous when you look at the targeting that we've been called for this year.
It was, they just changed the rules
That's 3 games in a row.
NCAA is going to widen the goal post for TU
Corrupt NCAA Refs
Corrupt NCAA Refs
The ball don't lie
After that, I have no idea what targeting is
Sip will never have anything called against them when it matters most.
Write that down.
Write that down.
Remember when we had a WR called for targeting this season?
It's called we want it to win.
Ask Jabre Barber and Gunner Stockton.
"After further review, the defender was wearing an orange emblem on their helmet, therefore, no targeting."
Come Out Roll said:
After that, I have no idea what targeting is
Does it involve a tu player? Then it is not targeting.
Does it involve an A&M player? Then yes targeting.
Same explanation if it is a holding call also. HTH.
Because nobody knows what targeting is. HTH.
ESPN and the entire system want texas (and the other big names) in the finals. No way that didn't influence that bull**** call.
I've seen targeting enforced that was no where as blatant as what the sips just got away with!!Noble Men said:
I do not understand how that obvious favoritism is allowed.
I want the NCAA to burn.
NOW, do all you children understand why us "OLDS" hate sips like we do??!!
That was the second time they didn't call targeting that I thought they would when they reviewed it. The first was when ASU intercepted the pass and the second defender his high on the tu receiver.
PS. Go watch the TD return by tu and you will see a textbook blind side block that should have been called (not targeting). It was the same type of hit that we had called against us in LSU game by Walker.
PS. Go watch the TD return by tu and you will see a textbook blind side block that should have been called (not targeting). It was the same type of hit that we had called against us in LSU game by Walker.
Noble Men said:
I do not understand how that obvious favoritism is allowed.
I want the NCAA to burn.
The NCAA doesn't control the playoffs, the commissioners and conferences do.
and the audacity to make the call as the player is on the ground injured
"PS. Go watch the TD return by tu and you will see a textbook blind side block that should have been called (not targeting). It was the same type of hit that we had called against us in LSU game by Walker. "
Yeap. Big fat blind-sider right in the middle of the filed.
Yeap. Big fat blind-sider right in the middle of the filed.
ASU TD in OT should have been called back. OL clearly pulled the RB which is not allowed. You can push but not pull. Surprised that wasn't called.
Agreed. Surprised that is was not mentioned by Tessitore and crew. Can push, but cannot pull.Kansas Kid said:
ASU TD in OT should have been called back. OL clearly pulled the RB which is not allowed. You can push but not pull. Surprised that wasn't called.
Refs should have to have a press conference where they answer questions and explain the reasoning behind calls. They need to explain why it wasn't targeting.
t.u. = targeting university. US, Georgia, ASU -- 3 critical non calls on blatant or borderline head to head contact.
AustinAg2K said:
Refs should have to have a press conference where they answer questions and explain the reasoning behind calls. They need to explain why it wasn't targeting.
That my friends, Will Never Happen!
This was the perfect ending for the powers that be. When ESiPN replays this later, they'll scoot by a "questionable call late in the 4th" before they go to 10 more highlights in OT. If that...then they can say officiating had nothing to do with the win.
But it damn sure did.
But it damn sure did.
aeon-ag said:I've seen targeting enforced that was no where as blatant as what the sips just got away with!!Noble Men said:
I do not understand how that obvious favoritism is allowed.
I want the NCAA to burn.
NOW, do all you children understand why us "OLDS" hate sips like we do??!!
The BMAs were apparently thrilled to play the sips again, even though we had a great series going against LSU. It's all about money so I don't expect we'll ever have another championship in football.
AustinAg2K said:
Refs should have to have a press conference where they answer questions and explain the reasoning behind calls. They need to explain why it wasn't targeting.
This game shows why losing teams say officials are against them. ASU had a targeting similar to the one tu had. ASU had a blatant pulling the runner that gave them a TD and tu had a blind side block on a scoring runback. People only remember the plays that go against the team they are rooting for and don't notice/remember the ones that go in their favor.
Would have never gotten to that point had targeting been called properly.Kansas Kid said:
ASU TD in OT should have been called back. OL clearly pulled the RB which is not allowed. You can push but not pull. Surprised that wasn't called.
"Real skill comes without effort"
- Mu Bai
This x 1000. Way too many years I've witnessed this.aeon-ag said:I've seen targeting enforced that was no where as blatant as what the sips just got away with!!Noble Men said:
I do not understand how that obvious favoritism is allowed.
I want the NCAA to burn.
NOW, do all you children understand why us "OLDS" hate sips like we do??!!
All college football teams are equal, but some are more equal than others
- Lee Corso
- Lee Corso
Southlake said:Would have never gotten to that point had targeting been called properly.Kansas Kid said:
ASU TD in OT should have been called back. OL clearly pulled the RB which is not allowed. You can push but not pull. Surprised that wasn't called.
And how do you know that? ASU kicking game was woeful and they would have still had a long way to go for a TD.
The more impactful non call against tu was the missed blind side block on the TD return.
Anyone have a clip? I didn't get to watch the game.
Bad view here. Other angle clearly shows helmet to helmet. Check out my later post.
— dubs408 (@dubsvidstouse) January 1, 2025
Featured Stories
See All
5 Thoughts: No. 3 Florida 89, No. 12 Texas A&M 70
by Luke Evangelist
Photo Gallery: Texas A&M men win 2025 SEC Indoor Championship
by Will Huffman
4:20
15h ago
6.0k
Earley's Aggies blanked by Oklahoma State on Saturday in Houston
by Richard Zane
LIVE from Reed Arena: Texas A&M vs. Arkansas
by Luke Evangelist