Classof25Battler said:
Hire a coordinator who won a Natty. There's a reason Lanning, Sark, and Smart have competitive teams. At the least hire someone who was a coordinator for a team that finished top 10? Then you get Day and Freeman included too, and Dillingham. I am starting to think Elko might have been the money saving hire until our coffers can reload. Also don't hire a guy who rode extremely talented QB play (see Malzahn, Fisher).
A LOT of truth in this. To be elite, and after all that is the aim here - be elite and one of the top 5-6 programs year in and year out, takes elite individuals that have experienced success at the ultimate level. This starts at AD and works its way down the organization. Coordinators are key but it starts with the AD and HC mind set.
We aren't in that elite group not because of lack of NIL funds, nor facilities or support. It's not the school's traditions either (Yell leaders etc). It's the culture inside the program, the expectations of how to be elite and be intentional about everything the program does internally every day.
Alberts has to have a blue print or it will just continue to be the same old poo.
Fan expectations need to be checked as we all know. Just accept it, until we dominate good teams and are winning 10+ annually, forget Natty talks etc. It's ridiculous. The over under of 8 or so wins each year is probably a good place to start.
Being elite is difficult. Georgia fired one their most successful coaches ever in Mark Richt after 15 seasons with 6 SEC title appearances and two titles plus a 70% conference winning percentage. He was beloved by the fan base. But they wanted to push the bar that extra smidge to get to the elite level. It worked. It could have back fired. First year was nothing special. But that is how hard it is to get to that level.
One last thought - I love most of the kids in the program, but for all the hype of recruiting and talent, I see 7-8 SEC teams that just look bigger, stronger, faster than our group. Especially on both lines. Sadly thought TU's lined dwarfed ours and completely controlled the game.
Anyway, this game was for nothing more than to give some optimism to the fan base for next year. It absolutely did the reverse.
Back to the OP, it does start at the coordinators and entire staff. As for the HC, doesn't have to be a name, but the resume and experiences are huge. I like Elko more than I dislike, but I'll leave you with this question. Based on year one so far obviously, late in a tight game with a solid opponent, do you have confidence in this staff that they have the players prepared and that the players believe in the staff?