SteveA said:
Ou has plenty of money. Their athletic program makes more than ours most years, and there are plenty of donors.
AD finances are hard to unpack but a quick glance at google tells me that I don't think that's right.
SteveA said:
Ou has plenty of money. Their athletic program makes more than ours most years, and there are plenty of donors.
Hill08 said:Players don't care who they play for….its all $$Jawbreaker said:
Hit the Portal after that?
OU outbid both A&M and Texas for Fasusi. Those saying OU is NIL-poor are very much mistaken.rickslatts said:
I can't believe Fasusi committed to this program going down the toilet. Not thinking clearly.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/19/college-sports-programs-valuations.htmlTAMUallen said:
OU is not financially well. Football program can hang in there for a bit but the fact they still have Venables tells you a lot
Nothing to do with OU boosters funding NIL. Oh yeah, USC can out-bid just about anybody for a coach, plus Riley didn't want to compete in the SEC.scotty918 said:
Google search "OU Italian monastery money issues". OU has financial stresses that are limiting its NIL effectiveness. This is part of the reason why Lincoln Riley left for USC.
Yeah, but they make the holidays much more enloyableamercer said:
Bowl games have been pretty meaningless since 1998. They are completely and utterly irrelevant now.
I doubt anyone (even OU sombrero dude) gives two ****s about the score of that game . I'll always pull for Navy because of my father in law, but bowl games are glorified scrimmages for 3rd stringers.
scotty918 said:
Google search "OU Italian monastery money issues". OU has financial stresses that are limiting its NIL effectiveness. This is part of the reason why Lincoln Riley left for USC.