4 said:
Can we all agree now that quality of opponent matters?
That auto bids (I realize IU is not an auto bid) are stupid because all conferences are not created equal?
And last but certainly not least, we do not need a committee of biased individuals voting on who the best teams are.
We have computers that can dispassionately consider strength of schedule, quality wins, etc. and calculate who the actual best teams are.
My guess is SMU and Boise will both get run out of the stadium, too.
Best two teams play in most CCGs. Best of the best meted abd takes auto-bid avd, most importantly has to compete with other CCG winners for the top four byes and also removes that choice from the committee.
One can argue whether Boise State is deserving of a bye, but the other three are good choices and Boise State wasn't awful as a choice, Clemson and SMU both were meh regardless of Clemson winning the CCG.
The first four out were Carolina (9-3), Ole Man SS (9-3), Miami (10-2), and Bama (9-3.) SMU was 11-2 with a ACC CCG loss and Clemson was 5th conference winner with a 10-3. Bama played out…with losses against two teams that weren't ranked at the time and a "better loss" against playoff invitee Tennessee.
Going to more teams (let's guess 20 since it keeps the byes and all conferences except the SEC insisted on conference champions avd byes for top four) means there is much less work for the committee to do as far as unbalancing the bracket.
I think we should wait until it's over to judge it. It's been vastly more interesting so far.