They should have made an example out of them and said no alcohol sales for the rest of the year
Well, they are going to have to at least throw a few of their fans to the wolves. They are not going to be able to say 'we couldn't identify anyone'. Some folks are going to pay the price, looks like not only no more football games but good-bye hoops and baseball also if they enjoyed going to those._mpaul said:That's pretty good, I think, although hard to make sure tu follows through on that obligation. I want an affidavit from a sip representive.45-70Ag said:
"Be required to use all available resources, including security, stadium and television video, to identify individuals who threw objects onto the playing field or at the opposing team. All individuals identified as having been involved in disrupting the game shall be prohibited from attending Texas Athletics events for the remainder of the 2024-25 academic and athletic year;"
newbie11 said:
I'm guessing no one will be identified.
agent-maroon said:newbie11 said:
I'm guessing no one will be identified.
Then the SEC should suspend alcohol sales for all conference games in all sports and see if that motivates anonymous witnesses to come forward.
agent-maroon said:newbie11 said:
I'm guessing no one will be identified.
Then the SEC should suspend alcohol sales for all conference games in all sports and see if that motivates anonymous witnesses to come forward.
😳Now it's getting serious for Texas. SEC says it "is not suspending alcohol sales privileges for the University of Texas at this time but reserves the right to do so if other requirements outlined are not met"
— Brett McMurphy (@Brett_McMurphy) October 20, 2024
The SEC will have a quota for the number of names they want. The sips will come up with a list of 30-40 registered student names that have never attended a tu game in their lives to satisfy this requirement. Nothing will be checked, no one will care about any of it in a week.newbie11 said:
I'm guessing no one will be identified.
combat wombat said:
The good folks of TexAgs should scour all available video sources and provide screenshots to assist in the identification of these hoodlums.
combat wombat said:
The good folks of TexAgs should scour all available video sources and provide screenshots to assist in the identification of these hoodlums.
rab79 said:spherical said:rab79 said:
As minimal as they could make it.
It's pre-written by laws… to do anything else they'd have to justify it was worse than what the by law calls out…
I see you didn't read the release, alcohol sales were on the table but were not pulled "at this time".
Must be something about the color orange that warps one's mind.waco_aggie05 said:rab79 said:spherical said:rab79 said:
As minimal as they could make it.
It's pre-written by laws… to do anything else they'd have to justify it was worse than what the by law calls out…
I see you didn't read the release, alcohol sales were on the table but were not pulled "at this time".
I will say I went and watched the Tennessee violation and consider the Vols violation to be worse. They were directly throwing objects at the Ole Miss team and tu did not (from what I saw)
rab79 said:
As minimal as they could make it.
This!The Zookeeper said:
If the SEC were in fact serious ... they'd start with the Ban of Alcohol and then make them earn it back with satisfactory completion of the punishment (identifying the perps and banning).
Take it to the outdoor board.combat wombat said:
The good folks of TexAgs should scour all available video sources and provide screenshots to assist in the identification of these hoodlums.
agent-maroon said:
I never really thought that it would motivate anybody and cared not either way. I mostly want them to lose the alcohol sales revenue TBH.
Why? Because **** them that's why.