Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Lamont Rogers (OT) flip?

6,701 Views | 26 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by rootube
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wiltfong has put a prediction of a flip to the good guys.

4 star #56 Nat #7 OT for On3

4 star #49 Nat #6 for 247 composite
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I will follow it up by saying this tweet made me research and On3 is predicting a flip. Wiltfong changed his prefiction after our game but it's behind a paywall

World's worst proofreader
Whaler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder if he was at the game today.
Viper16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NM
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm pretty sure he was
World's worst proofreader
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our win surely helped!

Any WRs or DBs he might flip?

Any notable recruits visit today?
HeyAbbott
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Missouri
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Viper16 said:

Flip from who?


Mizzou
Randy Rhodes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was thinking about this

Wouldn't be surprised

Would be a great OT pick up

Flip Fasusi or Haywood and it would be epic

What's with the Odom kid going to SMU?
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He was expected to commit to us by Texags before committing to Missouri
World's worst proofreader
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prediction confirmed

World's worst proofreader
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This really needs to happen. Make Coach Drink and Mizzou fan more salty than they already are right now
Maroon Flash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some of the top recruits have waited for us to prove we were on an upward trajectory before seriously considering us. Games like today really help.

Believe some of the shine is gonna come off Venables and Deboer as season progresses, which may lead to more flips to us.

I expect any more OLs that want in the boat better hurry up and jump in.
Maroon Flash
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we did lose out on some top targets because there was/is doubt in the program. This win is huge and if we can get to 9-3 I think it should eliminate the doubt.
World's worst proofreader
90ags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doubt caused by negative recruiting by other schools esp tu a couple SEc schools.

We do need some top WRs as losing all of those battles so far (pure Wr)…esp to tu, Oreg and Aub.
______________________________________________________ Play for the name on the front of your jersey, not the back...
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Auburn is gonna lose some players at this rate, and maybe their coach. The rumblings have begun...
OKC~Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

Auburn is gonna lose some players at this rate, and maybe their coach. The rumblings have begun...
good, not soon enough
warrington74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What about Florida state
TAM85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

Auburn is gonna lose some players at this rate, and maybe their coach. The rumblings have begun...


How about the WR that initially committed to A&M a year ago?
Bill Superman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

Wiltfong has put a prediction of a flip to the good guys.

4 star #56 Nat #7 OT for On3

4 star #49 Nat #6 for 247 composite
Could've sworn he used to be a 5*. He would be a huge get for us, and I would have to assume we'd lose an OL commit considering how many we have committed.

The way this OL is playing I don't think we'll have problems bringing in big time recruits there anymore.
rootube
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vander54 said:

I think we did lose out on some top targets because there was/is doubt in the program. This win is huge and if we can get to 9-3 I think it should eliminate the doubt.



Care to explain the Auburn class then?
texag101
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rootube said:

vander54 said:

I think we did lose out on some top targets because there was/is doubt in the program. This win is huge and if we can get to 9-3 I think it should eliminate the doubt.



Care to explain the Auburn class then?
Easy. NIL. See Jimbo.
WC94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When did all these 300+ pound 18 years old OL start getting guns? How the hell are you 15% body fat at that weight?
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bill Superman said:

vander54 said:

Wiltfong has put a prediction of a flip to the good guys.

4 star #56 Nat #7 OT for On3

4 star #49 Nat #6 for 247 composite
Could've sworn he used to be a 5*. He would be a huge get for us, and I would have to assume we'd lose an OL commit considering how many we have committed.

The way this OL is playing I don't think we'll have problems bringing in big time recruits there anymore.
He's right at the cusp now. So not unlikely, but I can't remember to be honest.
NyAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4 said:

Auburn is gonna lose some players at this rate, and maybe their coach. The rumblings have begun...


Good

Auburn getting bad karma for hiring a slimeball
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty sure he was a 5 star but dropped slightly at some point. Either way he's an elite recruit at a vital position.
World's worst proofreader
rootube
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texag101 said:

rootube said:

vander54 said:

I think we did lose out on some top targets because there was/is doubt in the program. This win is huge and if we can get to 9-3 I think it should eliminate the doubt.



Care to explain the Auburn class then?
Easy. NIL. See Jimbo.


So performance means nothing then and we can stop worrying. I don't think the top teams are getting outbid by Auburn if that's what you are suggesting.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.