Meanwhile in 1991

Arkansas will play their BEST game of the year against us.
Bank on it.

Randy Rhodes said:

---

Kd2012 said:

---

You obviously haven't seen Arkansas play

---

Just having fun with the doom and gloomers

---

I just did a quick look and your last three predictions were:
Three weeks ago: Ags would beat ND 31-14
Two weeks ago: Big deal the Ags lost, ND is the "best team we will play all year."
Last week: Ags would wallop BG 45-10

Not trying to cast aspersions, but could you please predict Elko losing this weekend so I know the game is in the bag?

They look as bad as us. The game is in Arlington still. I like our chances.

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Congratulations. Google is helpful

---

Sorry sir, not everyone can be as old as you. Yes I indeed watched every game against arky since 2012. I remember Kirk's kick return in 2017. Watched every year we started playing them. Actually remember in 2013 I was getting ready for a wedding while watching it.

You were 3 years old when I walked into Kyle Field for my first game

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

You were 3 years old when I walked into Kyle Field for my first game

---

You know what's crazy which is Actualy kind of funny not trying to mess with you. My first game was when I was two at Kyle field . Technically my first game ever was at jones AT&T when I was two weeks from being born when they shoved their goalpost into our section.

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

You were 3 years old when I walked into Kyle Field for my first game

---

You know what's crazy which is Actualy kind of funny not trying to mess with you. My first game was when I was two at Kyle field . Technically my first game ever was at jones AT&T when I was two weeks from being born when they shoved their goalpost into our section.

---

And you went to HS with CW?

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

You were 3 years old when I walked into Kyle Field for my first game

---

You know what's crazy which is Actualy kind of funny not trying to mess with you. My first game was when I was two at Kyle field . Technically my first game ever was at jones AT&T when I was two weeks from being born when they shoved their goalpost into our section.

---

And you went to HS with CW?

---

Nope. Same year as me though

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

Line is 6 and I think that's pretty reasonable. I have us by 3-7. But I have it as a 60/40 type of game. Certainly no layup. We could definitely lose.

beerad12man said:

---

Line is 6 and I think that's pretty reasonable. I have us by 3-7. But I have it as a 60/40 type of game. Certainly no layup. We could definitely lose.

---

-3.5 now at DraftKings.

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

---

I was actuaky trying to talk to you about just sport games we've attended. You were the one to bring up conners name ironically when what we were talking about wasn't even close to being about conner. Did you take any classes with him?

I did go to college late in life, but no. I'm also not trying to convince people there's still a QB battle by bringing up his name as if there's still one going on. And... it's at a nauseam.

I predict each week you'll bring up his name and in threads he's not even being talked about.

Wanna make an online bet?

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

I did go to college late in life, but no. I'm also not trying to convince people there's still a QB battle by bringing up his name as if there's still one going on. And... it's at a nauseam.

I predict each week you'll bring up his name and in threads he's not even being talked about.

Wanna make an online bet?

---

Do you listen to lucci or anyone. Conner is somewhat injured but yes conners not just done this year. Go watch the luchador pod and come back, he is literaly saying the same thing I am.

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

---

Absolutely...

He's
Our
Starting
Quarterback

Ok, you and Looch are talking about him. But on this board, it's just YOU

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

---

Absolutely...

He's
Our
Starting
Quarterback

---

as of now yes, since Conner isn't 100 percent

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Ok, you and Looch are talking about him. But on this board, it's just YOU

---

no lol. I've seen post saying the same thing. Like I said,"I don't care who starts, just play Reed till Conner is 100 percent, then evaluate then" just like lucci said. That's been my whole thing

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

---

Absolutely...

He's
Our
Starting
Quarterback

---

as of now yes, since Conner isn't 100 percent

---

Lol wouldn't even matter, he's not gonna be QB1 if and when he finally is healthy again

But go ahead and talk about an injured QB2

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Ok, you and Looch are talking about him. But on this board, it's just YOU

---

So I'm grouped in with probably the most well sourced Aggie. Sounds like a win to me

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

---

Absolutely...

He's
Our
Starting
Quarterback

---

as of now yes, since Conner isn't 100 percent

---

Lol wouldn't even matter, he's not gonna be QB1 if and when he finally is healthy again

But go ahead and talk about an injured QB2

---

You could be right, you could be wrong. That's why i said it will be cool to see it played out. Go watch the luchador and then come back and talk

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Ok, you and Looch are talking about him. But on this board, it's just YOU

---

So I'm grouped in with probably the most well sourced Aggie. Sounds like a win to me

---

Only in your mind

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

---

Absolutely...

He's
Our
Starting
Quarterback

---

as of now yes, since Conner isn't 100 percent

---

Lol wouldn't even matter, he's not gonna be QB1 if and when he finally is healthy again

But go ahead and talk about an injured QB2

---

I think Conner did something to you. You don't even like the fact that Conner could take back his spot when he's 100 percent.

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

---

Absolutely...

He's
Our
Starting
Quarterback

---

as of now yes, since Conner isn't 100 percent

---

Lol wouldn't even matter, he's not gonna be QB1 if and when he finally is healthy again

But go ahead and talk about an injured QB2

---

You could be right, you could be wrong. That's why i said it will be cool to see it played out. Go watch the luchador and then come back and talk

---

I can tell you're new to this. I've learned my lesson a long time ago about Looch

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Ok, you and Looch are talking about him. But on this board, it's just YOU

---

So I'm grouped in with probably the most well sourced Aggie. Sounds like a win to me

---

Only in your mind

---

you literaly just said you and lucci are the ones talking about him. The jokes write themselves

BMX Bandit said:

---

beerad12man said:

---

Line is 6 and I think that's pretty reasonable. I have us by 3-7. But I have it as a 60/40 type of game. Certainly no layup. We could definitely lose.

---

-3.5 now at DraftKings.

---

Ah. Interesting. Doesn't surprise me either way. Like I said, I see a 3-7 point win being the most likely outcome. So right there.

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

---

Absolutely...

He's
Our
Starting
Quarterback

---

as of now yes, since Conner isn't 100 percent

---

Lol wouldn't even matter, he's not gonna be QB1 if and when he finally is healthy again

But go ahead and talk about an injured QB2

---

I think Conner did something to you. You don't even like the fact that Conner could take back his spot when he's 100 percent.

---

Conner did do something to me, your right. He started our season off with a loss by throwing for 99 yards

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Ok, you and Looch are talking about him. But on this board, it's just YOU

---

So I'm grouped in with probably the most well sourced Aggie. Sounds like a win to me

---

Only in your mind

---

you literaly just said you and lucci are the ones talking about him. The jokes write themselves

---

Yes, if Looch is still talking about him at lengths, it's just your two talking about him

Everyone else has moved on to Reed.

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

---

Absolutely...

He's
Our
Starting
Quarterback

---

as of now yes, since Conner isn't 100 percent

---

Lol wouldn't even matter, he's not gonna be QB1 if and when he finally is healthy again

But go ahead and talk about an injured QB2

---

I think Conner did something to you. You don't even like the fact that Conner could take back his spot when he's 100 percent.

---

Conner did do something to me, your right. He started our season off with a loss by throwing for 99 yards

---

Yes he had an awful game. That doesn't change anything of what I just said lol. Like I said, Marcel is starting right now, when Conner is 100 percent, I bet they evaluate more. Like I've said all along

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Zero chance you two aren't connected in some way. Yall went to the same HS, or you've had some classes with him at A&M. Yall are the same age and you inject him into entirely way too many threads.

Creepy

---

We could say the same about you with Reed. I have my opinion, you have yours. Difference is I've tried to be civil, you continually bash me everytime I comment, even if it's not about Conner. Or when I say, I hope Reed or Conner start off hot against arky, you bash me for bringing up conners name when in reality, we don't know who's going to start. And it's not just me who's noticed that.

---

Absolutely...

He's
Our
Starting
Quarterback

---

as of now yes, since Conner isn't 100 percent

---

Lol wouldn't even matter, he's not gonna be QB1 if and when he finally is healthy again

But go ahead and talk about an injured QB2

---

I think Conner did something to you. You don't even like the fact that Conner could take back his spot when he's 100 percent.

---

Conner did do something to me, your right. He started our season off with a loss by throwing for 99 yards

---

Yes he had an awful game. That doesn't change anything of what I just said lol. Like I said, Marcel is starting right now, when Conner is 100 percent, I bet they evaluate more. Like I've said all along

---

2 starts
Last 10 quarters
Zero Interceptions

How mad are you?

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

BraxtonW said:

---

Aggie Dad 26 said:

---

Ok, you and Looch are talking about him. But on this board, it's just YOU

---

So I'm grouped in with probably the most well sourced Aggie. Sounds like a win to me

---

Only in your mind

---

you literaly just said you and lucci are the ones talking about him. The jokes write themselves

---

Yes, if Looch is still talking about him at lengths, it's just your two talking about him

Everyone else has moved on to Reed.

---

You are so delusional. Like I said Reed could start all season and I would still be right, Conner could start and I would be right. You are just flat out wrong saying there isn't a chance Conner sees the field. Now here is a question, IF Conner comes and starts another game, are you going to come here and admit you're wrong?

I think some have given up on Conner way too early and appointed Reed way too early. He hasn't come close to securing this job over a healthy Conner. The question is, can Conner get healthy? That's a legitimate concern. If he is truly healthy, I'd give him the edge to be our starter again eventually.

Reed has flashed athletically with some fun plays, but Conner at his best was absolutely better than anything we have seen from Reed at his best. I don't have a dog in the fight, and just want the best guy for the job and to win games. But with Reed, he's started basically 3 games (Ok State was play 2), and we have scored 23, 26, and 26 offensive points against 3 mediocre defenses. I really, truly don't understand how some act like he jumped in and swept the job away from Conner, just because in game one removed 10 months from football and coming off an injury, Conner struggled.