Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Connor listed as Questionable?

63,765 Views | 328 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Blonde Coffee Beans
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Conner doesn't play then I would expect to see both Reed and Henderson both get reps so they can get a look and further develop both. Then TA gets all of their dreams come true.
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most popular guy on the team is ALWAYS the backup QB
JDCAG (NOT Colin)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wearer of the Ring said:

Maybe it just means they don't know if McNeese Weigman or Notre Dame Weigman will show up.


I think those two are closer than people want to admit. Biggest difference was what was across the line of scrimmage.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NoahAg said:

Klein buying himself another year. "Oh my QB was hurt, so we couldn't run my offense."


Wait, you went from Reed is better for his offense to this rather quickly. Never change TexAgs.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:

Wearer of the Ring said:

Maybe it just means they don't know if McNeese Weigman or Notre Dame Weigman will show up.


I think those two are closer than people want to admit. Biggest difference was what was across the line of scrimmage.


If this is the case that shows Conner might be a lost cause.

Or maybe he stopped smoking weed after ND game. But having withdraw and not being able to stay off it failed his drug test.
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I never thought I would be nostalgic for Mond.
Shoefly!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kozmozag said:

I never thought I would be nostalgic for Mond.

Ahahaha, yea!
AggieZUUL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That card trick was a doozy. No more magicians.
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From a limited sample size CW does not appear to be the best fit for Klein's offense. If he is hurt we will find out if Reed or Henderson fits the scheme better, seeing how both have better running abilities on called run plays they may. Think one of the ideal QBs for Klein's offense will be on the other side of the ball, huge strong kid with a great arm with Lagway

Some guys are injury prone, I was preseason all district 2 years and never was all district since I got hurt 3 out of 4 years. My body could not handle the abuse.
Bryanisbest
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:

Wearer of the Ring said:

Maybe it just means they don't know if McNeese Weigman or Notre Dame Weigman will show up.


I think those two are closer than people want to admit. Biggest difference was what was across the line of scrimmage.




No, they are actually further apart than people
want to admit. This week we are back to the ND version.
Seamaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Based on what I've seen of CW, I think I'd rather see #10 or #16 if am honest.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Known

Weigman was horrible Vs ND.
He talked in the Monday PC that one game does not define him.
He played good against McNeese. Scored 5 TDs. Left game.
He again talks at Monday PC. Leadership and other areas.

And now questionable.

I have no idea what's his issues are this year. But what he stated in his PCs does not line up with what's happening since Monday that makes him questionable. It seems he states things he wishes were true but the actions are not lining up. Does not appear like a player with confidence.
AggieDub04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Or maybe (putting a few puzzle pieces together) he suffered a shoulder injury vs ND that they thought he could play through and it's gotten progressively worse to the point he can't throw consistently?
ArkyAg99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure what yall were watching vs McNeese but Reed definitely isn't ready. He short hopped three easy throws and his biggest production was one read then tuck and run. If Weigman doesn't play I hope Reed kills it. Based on last Saturday, there might be a lot of upset people
The Marksman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If CW can't go, Henderson should start. He's an experienced veteran and looked fantastic last season. Do we really want Reed's first start to be in the Swamp?
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Henderson did not look fantastic last year, he looked good though. Unless you are a once in a generation QB like Jameis then good is your ceiling in Jimbo's offense
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
spongeboob_squaresharts said:

I heard it's his shoulder. Barely practiced today and threw some bad passes.
So situation is same as last year?
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
StinkyPinky said:

If Conner doesn't play then I would expect to see both Reed and Henderson both get reps so they can get a look and further develop both. Then TA gets all of their dreams come true.
Should have given each of them a quarter last weekend instead of giving Reed the whole half.
DFCURT
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On the bright side of NIL and the transfer portal, it has changed CFB enough to where it's much easier to not give a crap about A&Ms comical misfortune.

Talk about snake bit. This crap is unbelievable. This game should be a layup.
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wangus12 said:

StinkyPinky said:

If Conner doesn't play then I would expect to see both Reed and Henderson both get reps so they can get a look and further develop both. Then TA gets all of their dreams come true.
Should have given each of them a quarter last weekend instead of giving Reed the whole half.
While I would have liked that as well, it just means Elko and Klein have their minds made up on it and wanted to give their #2 max reps in that situation.
Gyles Marrett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
P.U.T.U said:

From a limited sample size CW does not appear to be the best fit for Klein's offense. If he is hurt we will find out if Reed or Henderson fits the scheme better, seeing how both have better running abilities on called run plays they may. Think one of the ideal QBs for Klein's offense will be on the other side of the ball, huge strong kid with a great arm with Lagway

Some guys are injury prone, I was preseason all district 2 years and never was all district since I got hurt 3 out of 4 years. My body could not handle the abuse.
We got to see a little over a full half of Reed last week. People act like that didn't happen. It was quite clear why Weigman is QB1 and Reed is still QB2. Reed has a lot of potential but there was a clear gap between the two.


We also as a fanbase should really stop the unsubstantiated rumors about weed and Conner. I'm not sure what you all think that accomplishes in a positive way for our program.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jriv09 said:

Not sure what yall were watching vs McNeese but Reed definitely isn't ready. He short hopped three easy throws and his biggest production was one read then tuck and run. If Weigman doesn't play I hope Reed kills it. Based on last Saturday, there might be a lot of upset people


Reed has something wonky with his throwing motion that needs to get worked out.
jsc8116
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Notre Dame Weigman would have scored 50 on Mcneese....
MagnumLoad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texag101 said:

How the f does our qb get hurt in practice? Good lord.

And two db. WTF are we doing in practice? I don't buy the ND shoulder injury story based on what I saw last week.
MisterJones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kozmozag said:

I never thought I would be nostalgic for Mond.


Aside from JFF, the only QB I'm nostalgic for is Reggie McNeal
MagnumLoad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gap said:

Did Reed win the job this week and this is the least controversial way to do it?

Apparently Weigman's injury did not occur against McNeese or in practice this week, but happened against Notre Dame.

I don't buy that
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieDub04 said:

Or maybe (putting a few puzzle pieces together) he suffered a shoulder injury vs ND that they thought he could play through and it's gotten progressively worse to the point he can't throw consistently?


Or maybe the lack of confidence he showed against a challenging team is showing up again this week bc we are not playing a directional school. Jackie said after the ND game Weigman looked nothing like the QB we saw the first two years. No swagger or confidence. So it's not just me seeing this lack of confidence.

As far as which QB to play if Weigman is out. Henderson seems the better option to me purely based on SEC experience. My guess is Reed was number 2 bc he was younger ( did not want to think about transferring) and they placed him there over Henderson to start purely bc of course they thought Weigman would be number 1 all season. Now with Weigman possibly out, I guess they most likely stay with Reed at first. But it's more bc they had him at for 2 to start bc of above reasons. Not bc Henderson would help us have a better chance at winning now.
12thMan9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Until Saturday, we're all 50/50.

Some smart SEC coach will figure that out & list the entire team as 50/50.
Ronnie '88
dcs12345
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MisterJones said:

Kozmozag said:

I never thought I would be nostalgic for Mond.


Aside from JFF, the only QB I'm nostalgic for is Reggie McNeal
His deep throws on the out and up routes against OU were magical...
Agsttt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Conner cannot go and Reed starts, Henderson has to be licking his chops knowing all the armchair twits online (pardon the redundancy) will be calling for him to go in the game after one punt.
OrygunAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieDub04 said:

Or maybe (putting a few puzzle pieces together) he suffered a shoulder injury vs ND that they thought he could play through and it's gotten progressively worse to the point he can't throw consistently?

Maybe he was hurt before ND. Best of luck to the kid but I'd think the staff started their best option to win in both games.
TX_Aggie37
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wangus12 said:

StinkyPinky said:

If Conner doesn't play then I would expect to see both Reed and Henderson both get reps so they can get a look and further develop both. Then TA gets all of their dreams come true.
Should have given each of them a quarter last weekend instead of giving Reed the whole half.
You give your QB2 every single possible snap in that game 1000 times out of 1000. Can't afford to take reps away from him for QB3.
Agsttt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TX_Aggie37 said:

wangus12 said:

StinkyPinky said:

If Conner doesn't play then I would expect to see both Reed and Henderson both get reps so they can get a look and further develop both. Then TA gets all of their dreams come true.
Should have given each of them a quarter last weekend instead of giving Reed the whole half.
You give your QB2 every single possible snap in that game 1000 times out of 1000. Can't afford to take reps away from him for QB3.


My point was the backup quarterback is ALWAYS The most popular player on the team two seconds after things turn less than perfect. It's lunacy.
Agsttt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TX_Aggie37 said:

wangus12 said:

StinkyPinky said:

If Conner doesn't play then I would expect to see both Reed and Henderson both get reps so they can get a look and further develop both. Then TA gets all of their dreams come true.
Should have given each of them a quarter last weekend instead of giving Reed the whole half.
You give your QB2 every single possible snap in that game 1000 times out of 1000. Can't afford to take reps away from him for QB3.


There is a reason Elko is coaching and no one on this board is. Goodness gracious. Hell, there's a reason position coaches at JUCOs are coaching. ahead of people on this board who think they know better.

merch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We can debate CW but coaches have him as starter. If we are down our starting QB in week 3 already this just adds more to snake bit theory…
Nothing looks more foolish than tradition to those who have none.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.