Elko should rack up six wins in the first seven games and finish with a 10 plus win season.
A slow start would be a disaster.
A slow start would be a disaster.
You need to troll less.NowhereMan said:
Elko should rack up six wins in the first seven games and finish with a 10 plus win season.
A slow start would be a disaster.
What's your theory on defenders making tackles and WRs catching passes?TyperWoods said:
It's not just that.
Elko needs to score points while not allowing our opponents to score as many.
This is crucial to success.
Would you say it is important to execute the playsTyperWoods said:
It's not just that.
Elko needs to score points while not allowing our opponents to score as many.
This is crucial to success.
Once Jimbo accumulated the needed talent to become a top tier contender his S&C coach left and was replaced by an absolute dud. The new S&C guy didn't create a culture of discipline, competition, and the overall weight training and nutrition had our team looking so slow and inexplosive not to mention often injured. Jimbo then lost his OL coach who also was the only person in the building willing to suggest a more modern offense, he was replace by Addazio who sucked. Elko left and was replaced by a DC that wanted to use a two gap scheme with heavy personnel and had the DB coach teaching the worst chase technique I have ever seen, should have never been hired. Jimbo hired his buddies to be "coaches" yet most were recruiters only that struggled to coach up the talent on campus and put them in a position for success.Bobby Jimbo said:
Why didn't Jimbo have a 10-win season in his time here? Is he stupid?
You get out of here with your 4D chess. Witch!TyperWoods said:
It's not just that.
Elko needs to score points while not allowing our opponents to score as many.
This is crucial to success.
The plays were there. We just needed to execute.Actual Talking Thermos said:Would you say it is important to execute the playsTyperWoods said:
It's not just that.
Elko needs to score points while not allowing our opponents to score as many.
This is crucial to success.
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:Once Jimbo accumulated the needed talent to become a top tier contender his S&C coach left and was replaced by an absolute dud. The new S&C guy didn't create a culture of discipline, competition, and the overall weight training and nutrition had our team looking so slow and inexplosive not to mention often injured. Jimbo then lost his OL coach who also was the only person in the building willing to suggest a more modern offense, he was replace by Addazio who sucked. Elko left and was replaced by a DC that wanted to use a two gap scheme with heavy personnel and had the DB coach teaching the worst chase technique I have ever seen, should have never been hired. Jimbo hired his buddies to be "coaches" yet most were recruiters only that struggled to coach up the talent on campus and put them in a position for success.Bobby Jimbo said:
Why didn't Jimbo have a 10-win season in his time here? Is he stupid?
Jimbo himself didnt create a culture where the offense was simple and clean, see all the false starts and delay of games coming out of timeouts. Jimbo ran a sloppy program, we didnt have a special teams coach it cost us games every year. Jimbo had his GM go to Oregon and was replaced by an incompetent fool, dont know who that was on. Overall the details were not being handled by Jimbo or anyone at Bright.
He preached grit, discipline, sacrifice but those things were not there on gameday other than grit. Lastly, the amount of one score games we lost is staggering. A good coach would have made the adjustments in year 4 to get those wins instead of banging that square into the circle.
WC94 said:
Need to beat sips at home or the narritive will be sickening...
NowhereMan said:
Elko should rack up six wins in the first seven games and finish with a 10 plus win season.
A slow start would be a disaster.
Iraq2xVeteran said:
We have a favorable schedule with our toughest games against Notre Dame, Missouri, LSU, and Texas at home and winnable road games at Florida, Mississippi State, South Carolina, and Auburn. Hopefully, we can beat Notre Dame in Week 1 and snap a 10-game road losing streak with a win at Florida.
NoahAg said:
I've been doing a lot of offseason research. From what I've learned SO FAR, it would be a lot better to win a bunch of games than it would be to lose. Just my opinion.
I meant a favorable home/away schedule with our toughest games at home and less difficult SEC games on the road. All 4 road games at Florida, Mississippi State South Carolina, Auburn appear winnable, and I hope we win at least 2 of them. If our home and road games were flipped, our schedule would be much less favorable because we are much better at home than on the road.fieldtrailer said:Iraq2xVeteran said:
We have a favorable schedule with our toughest games against Notre Dame, Missouri, LSU, and Texas at home and winnable road games at Florida, Mississippi State, South Carolina, and Auburn. Hopefully, we can beat Notre Dame in Week 1 and snap a 10-game road losing streak with a win at Florida.
That's a favorable schedule? SC and Auburn look like only favorable schedule.
We dont have an oline, again. Just no talent upgrade. That group is the biggest disappointment with use of portal. All hoping the injuries just disappear. Even if they do, those guys are not working out full strength while healing. Along with minimal running backs. Going to be a challenging year. One of these years, they'll figure out how important the oline is.
Regarding the schedule: Miss State, Florida, Arky, and South Carolina are all very talent depleted from where they were just 2 seasons ago (2022) and they all also very young. LSU lost a ton of talent on both sides, their OL is strong and I am sure they have plenty of RBs and skill guys but its a lot to replace. Auburn is always going to be tough, they have legit talent.fieldtrailer said:Iraq2xVeteran said:
We have a favorable schedule with our toughest games against Notre Dame, Missouri, LSU, and Texas at home and winnable road games at Florida, Mississippi State, South Carolina, and Auburn. Hopefully, we can beat Notre Dame in Week 1 and snap a 10-game road losing streak with a win at Florida.
That's a favorable schedule? SC and Auburn look like only favorable schedule.
We dont have an oline, again. Just no talent upgrade. That group is the biggest disappointment with use of portal. All hoping the injuries just disappear. Even if they do, those guys are not working out full strength while healing. Along with minimal running backs. Going to be a challenging year. One of these years, they'll figure out how important the oline is.