How did they do it? First year coach, tons of mid-rated transfers playing key roles and an outlier in minimum blue-chip ratio for teams reaching the title game.
TCU - (potentially) playing for a national championship is crazy
7,728 Views |
59 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by 2012heisman
boyfriend said:
How did they do it? First year coach, tons of mid-rated transfers playing key roles and an outlier in minimum blue-chip ratio for teams reaching the title game.
Lots of experience in the starting 22. 20 are jr/sr.
Would this be the first Big 12 team to win a playoff game?
I think so, first team from outside the big, sec, acc to make the title game in the playoff era.
Michigan didn't want to be at this bowl.
Gig Em and God Bless America
Texas A&M National Champions in Football 1917, 1919, 1927, 1939, and 2012
SEC Proud!
Texas A&M National Champions in Football 1917, 1919, 1927, 1939, and 2012
SEC Proud!
InMyOpinion said:boyfriend said:
How did they do it? First year coach, tons of mid-rated transfers playing key roles and an outlier in minimum blue-chip ratio for teams reaching the title game.
Lots of experience in the starting 22. 20 are jr/sr.
This is what the portal does and I'm all for the parity.
They may not be all that great next year without Duggin and all the upperclassmen.
Could look more like Arky this year.
There should be a term called the Talent and Experience Rating that shows raw talent (recruit rating) combined with experience. Something that shows a senior 3* O-lineman is better than a 5* fish.
For each recruit star, you get a point. For each year, you get a point. Typical max points would be 7- 9 per player unless you have a Covid senior. Total max for each side of the ball would be ~100.
For each recruit star, you get a point. For each year, you get a point. Typical max points would be 7- 9 per player unless you have a Covid senior. Total max for each side of the ball would be ~100.
I had no clue their defense was so quick.
I love Jimbo but, their guys actually "execute" bruh
I love Jimbo but, their guys actually "execute" bruh
bowhuntr said:
There should be a term called the Talent and Experience Rating that shows raw talent (recruit rating) combined with experience. Something that shows a senior 3* O-lineman is better than a 5* fish.
For each recruit star, you get a point. For each year, you get a point. Typical max points would be 7- 9 per player unless you have a Covid senior. Total max for each side of the ball would be ~100.
Agree.
Would be really good to use starts or snaps but would be a huge undertaking.
This. Retention matters
Ufck next year when you're in the championship game THIS year.He is Ass My Dude said:InMyOpinion said:boyfriend said:
How did they do it? First year coach, tons of mid-rated transfers playing key roles and an outlier in minimum blue-chip ratio for teams reaching the title game.
Lots of experience in the starting 22. 20 are jr/sr.
This is what the portal does and I'm all for the parity.
They may not be all that great next year without Duggin and all the upperclassmen.
Could look more like Arky this year.
InMyOpinion said:bowhuntr said:
There should be a term called the Talent and Experience Rating that shows raw talent (recruit rating) combined with experience. Something that shows a senior 3* O-lineman is better than a 5* fish.
For each recruit star, you get a point. For each year, you get a point. Typical max points would be 7- 9 per player unless you have a Covid senior. Total max for each side of the ball would be ~100.
Agree.
Would be really good to use starts or snaps but would be a huge undertaking.
I want to see what this looks like for something like the App State game…I think it would be a great TexAgs term, something different and unlike any other stat I've seen.
The Aggie "100 year" decision helped immensely!!
I wouldn't fret over a TCU NC. The last time they won one was 1938. Who won in 1939?
Who would've thought that they will be the first Texas school to play in the national championship since the horns in the 2009 season? Their 2014 season was also really good too.
Come on TCU!!
crazy since 2000: Baylor won a natty, sips won a natty, tech made a natty, tcu makes a natty, aggies…
Everyone talks about recruiting, but the other x-factor in making strong teams is having experienced upperclassmen. TCU has the latter
So many forward laterals. LOL
Oregon literally played in the first oneboyfriend said:
I think so, first team from outside the big, sec, acc to make the title game in the playoff era.
It's ridiculous that TCU is going to the NC while A&M and tu look pathetic. Sickening. Shows what coaching and grit plus some luck will get.
If they call targetting...
No, they thought that the lowly "frogs" would be awed by "Big Blue" and just roll over.VatoLocoAggie said:
Michigan didn't want to be at this bowl.
Make up call.
You're right, Chip Kelly and Oregon destroyed Jimbo's Noles
Or not.
Get ****ed Michigan fans.
Since clearly you are including sports other than football, I will point out that the Aggies won national titles during that same time frame in golf and womens basketball. But all you want to do is bleed all over Jimbo's ****ty 2022 season.BigDave21 said:
crazy since 2000: Baylor won a natty, sips won a natty, tech made a natty, tcu makes a natty, aggies…
Good for them, incredible effort and season. Tcu playing for a national title is something that no one saw coming, absolutely amazing.
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Since clearly you are including sports other than football, I will point out that the Aggies won national titles during that same time frame in golf and womens basketball. But all you want to do is bleed all over Jimbo's ****ty 2022 season.BigDave21 said:
crazy since 2000: Baylor won a natty, sips won a natty, tech made a natty, tcu makes a natty, aggies…
Not all championships are equal… not even close
Not to mention 9 Track and Field NCsCinco Ranch Aggie said:Since clearly you are including sports other than football, I will point out that the Aggies won national titles during that same time frame in golf and womens basketball. But all you want to do is bleed all over Jimbo's ****ty 2022 season.BigDave21 said:
crazy since 2000: Baylor won a natty, sips won a natty, tech made a natty, tcu makes a natty, aggies…
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:Since clearly you are including sports other than football, I will point out that the Aggies won national titles during that same time frame in golf and womens basketball. But all you want to do is bleed all over Jimbo's ****ty 2022 season.BigDave21 said:
crazy since 2000: Baylor won a natty, sips won a natty, tech made a natty, tcu makes a natty, aggies…
For what he gets paid, he's earned being **** on for not even making a bowl.
It's a great story. It's also great to see a new team in the mix instead of the same 2 or three. I'll be pulling for them in the championship.
wangus12 said:Not to mention 9 Track and Field NCsCinco Ranch Aggie said:Since clearly you are including sports other than football, I will point out that the Aggies won national titles during that same time frame in golf and womens basketball. But all you want to do is bleed all over Jimbo's ****ty 2022 season.BigDave21 said:
crazy since 2000: Baylor won a natty, sips won a natty, tech made a natty, tcu makes a natty, aggies…
Forgot we pack 100k for track and field
Tcu playing for a chance at a title before the Ags is just more proof how colossal of a failure this staff and the crap hc has been.
Featured Stories
See All
10:14
19h ago
6.8k
Zach Clemence leads Texas A&M's 3-point barrage vs. South Carolina
by Olin Buchanan
5 Thoughts: Texas A&M 92, South Carolina 69
by Luke Evangelist
5:03
18h ago
1.6k
Game Highlights: Texas A&M 92, South Carolina 69
by Reece Nygren
9:44
1d ago
2.7k
Shane Sdao's injury changed his perspective on baseball and life
by Ryan Brauninger