Pods would not necessitate semfi-final games and the conference would not do that. They would just take the top 2 teams by SEC record, with tie-breakers of H2H, record in pod, CFP ranking, etc., etc. But I highly doubt for those very reasons they will do pods, which seems like more of a fan driven idea to get all teams playing each other more frequently.
My guess is it will be 2 divisions, Bama and Auburn move east, Mizzou moves west. 9 game conference season, 7 in division, rotate the other 2. That way you do play every team at least once every 4 years, though it is every 8 years to complete and home-and-away cycle.
Most importantly from the old-guard SEC perspective, moving Bama and Auburn to the East protects the Bama - UT, Iron Bow, and Auburn - UGA games. Bama - UT and UGA - Auburn are the ONLY reasons we currently have a 6-1-1 sked and we play USC and LSU plays FL. LSU - FL is not a traditional SEC crossover rivalry game, though it is a great series. Bama - UT and The South's Oldest Rivalry and most played game, Auburn - UGA, those are games that MUST be on the schedule. Bama, UT, UGA and Auburn will not vote for any expansion, division/pod makeup, or schedule that does not include those games, period. Ironically Bama has not played UGA much in their history despite being border states.
It is true you could put UGA, UT, Bama and Auburn in a pod, but that is odd fitting as FL would be in a pod with teams not close to them.
99% sure it will be West - East divisions, 9 game conference schedule. playing every team in a 4 year cyle is actually an improvement over what we have right now with the 6-1-1 schedule.
There is no way to stick with 8 conference games unless they do pods. But I also don't see the increased TV $$ without the additional SEC games.