fav13andac1)c said:1000 yd rusher doesn't make a top-5 list that doesn't have a single 1000 yd rusher. Makes sense.FamilyForeverAgs said:
This publication also ranked our OL 40th in the nation. I think it's time to stop posting their anti-A&M nonsense.
I'm not gonna give them a click, but maybe they were basing it on the individuals and their draft prospects and not on the O-Line as a whole. It'd be a horrible way to rank OL, but I've seen dumber things.fav13andac1)c said:
They posted it during the middle of the season; ranking of our current o-line. What was also weird was that we had one of the best rushing attacks and had a very low sack per dropback percentage at the time, making the ranking perplexing at the very least.
Edit: Found it.
https://www.pff.com/news/college-football-ranking-all-127-fbs-offensive-lines-through-cfb-week-13
500,000ags said:
Isiah is going to have a tough time getting 20+ carries with Achane and LJ in the mix. Especially, if he comes back for his senior season.
500,000ags said:
Isiah is going to have a tough time getting 20+ carries with Achane and LJ in the mix. Especially, if he comes back for his senior season.
azhector72 said:
so the tu RB is off the list as well?
Does this guy watch football?
azhector72 said:
so the tu RB is off the list as well?
Does this guy watch football?
I wouldn't overlook Jackson at the RB position. I think we can safely say that Anais is going to play majority of his snaps as true WR.500,000ags said:
Isiah is going to have a tough time getting 20+ carries with Achane and LJ in the mix. Especially, if he comes back for his senior season.