Blue star this thread... also if net neutrality passes we likely will have to pay to access Texags in the future
BeatHellOutOfTU said:
Blue star this thread... also if net neutrality passes we likely will have to pay to access Texags in the future
Why/How would Soros benefit from the removal of net neutrality?jxs40 said:
I guess TexAgs has finally made it to the big leagues when Soros' bots bother to post here
GooseAg14 said:Why/How would Soros benefit from the removal of net neutrality?jxs40 said:
I guess TexAgs has finally made it to the big leagues when Soros' bots bother to post here
Never been over to forum 16 have you?jxs40 said:
I guess TexAgs has finally made it to the big leagues when Soros' bots bother to post here
Yeah... no. Nice scaremongering by the nanny state though. Give more power to big brother!!!MrAbyss said:
so you woud rather pay for package deals like cable to access certain sites? cause thats where this will 100% head
MrAbyss said:
so you woud rather pay for package deals like cable to access certain sites? cause thats where this will 100% head
MrAbyss said:
isnt that what everyone says before the sky falls lol?
I hope it doesnt happen, and i would like to think it cant but companies do love new ways to make more beautiful munnies.
I need to read up more on this i think, i think ive sorely misunderstood what it is lol. I thought net neutrality kept the govs hands off of the internet. Im of the thought group of " i dont want anyone touching the internet. Keep that ish as free as possible"Quote:
You're right, we should trust Trump to manage a highly complex, dynamic technology marketplace instead. Great plan dude.
Aggiebrewer said:
Net neutrality is the devil
Yall better get edumacated on it
Texas300Mag said:
That's as silly as the DOJ's argument that att/TW will stop selling HBO on all the other competitors services. If these companies throttled speed to these mega companies (Google, Netflix, etc) customers would switch to a non-throttler.
Unless of course they all colude with each other and that's so unlikely with all the class action attorneys just waiting to make a billion!
Yeah yours right on the broadband speeds but I don't think you see the big picture. Elimating net neutrality gives the broadband provides the power to slow down competitor's websites and encourage us to use there's ( if you have Verizon say goodbye to google, bc they want to have you use yahoo who they just bought out). It also lets this company's add in subscription packages on certain areas of the internet you can acccess. So now you pay $30 for internet plus $8 or more for each package you wanted like social, streaming video, streaming music, and email and ect .Texas300Mag said:
NPH and Goose.
This isn't football so not sure why we're debating here but You are missing the point. If you built cable facilities for the use of individuals to share at same price and one of you morons was constantly streaming movies or hosting gaming services the telcos and cable companies would have to build more facilities so casual users like me would stop complaining about slow speeds.
Eliminating Net Neutrality solves this. These companies aren't going to screw over the average user; they will protect us poors from abusers.
Swill94 said:Yeah yours right on the broadband speeds but I don't think you see the big picture. Elimating net neutrality gives the broadband provides the power to slow down competitor's websites and encourage us to use there's ( if you have Verizon say goodbye to google, bc they want to have you use yahoo who they just bought out). It also lets this company's add in subscription packages on certain areas of the internet you can acccess. So now you pay $30 for internet plus $8 or more for each package you wanted like social, streaming video, streaming music, and email and ect .Texas300Mag said:
NPH and Goose.
This isn't football so not sure why we're debating here but You are missing the point. If you built cable facilities for the use of individuals to share at same price and one of you morons was constantly streaming movies or hosting gaming services the telcos and cable companies would have to build more facilities so casual users like me would stop complaining about slow speeds.
Eliminating Net Neutrality solves this. These companies aren't going to screw over the average user; they will protect us poors from abusers.
If you're pissed about your broadband speed then I was just pay for a better provider if you can who can accommodate for those jerks. With net neutrality we put the burden on the suppliers, these companies have to be innovated and offer resonable prices in order to attract costumers. Besides its not like they're all going bankrupt these companies have huge profit margins.
Jack Cheese said:
NOTHING WILL CHANGE YOU IDIOTS.
Because net neutrality was a non solution to a nonexistent problem. A bunch of huge corporations rent seeking, with an administration looking for any reason to expand their regulatory reach.
Don't be a bunch of gullible fools.
quiz said:Jack Cheese said:
NOTHING WILL CHANGE YOU IDIOTS.
Because net neutrality was a non solution to a nonexistent problem. A bunch of huge corporations rent seeking, with an administration looking for any reason to expand their regulatory reach.
Don't be a bunch of gullible fools.
Nothing will change? Is that why the TeleComs have lobbied to reverse it? Cuz it's meaningless? If you want to see gullible, look in the mirror.