Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Starkel has been cleared to play?

10,154 Views | 90 Replies | Last: 8 yr ago by Tamu_mgm
Dallasag02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:26a, 10/14/17
That starkel offense was a completely different offense than we're running right now.

He wasnt exactly lighting it up through the air and he might've been the slowest qb I've ever seen on the run where he got hurt.

Mond has earned his spot, stick with it. Hope Sumlin has learned his QB lesson.
Reply Quote
Stone44
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:28a, 10/14/17
Was not impressed with Stark---Mond is getting better every game. He is our QB until Grant gets here . He will lead to victory over the Gators today.
Reply Quote
Luigi Vampa
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to StrykerAg • 10:29a, 10/14/17
StrykerAg said:
Redshirt Starkel, continue playing Mond for the season. Let them compete in the offseason. Hopefully the loser understands injuries happen and they can go in at anytime and does not transfer.


Starkel has used his RS year, and would not qualify for a medical RS, so he will just be a normal backup.
Reply Quote
_mpaul
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KidDoc • 10:32a, 10/14/17
Thanks so much for using "piqued" rather than "peaked."
Reply Quote
1 edit
Signel
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:33a, 10/14/17
Stark was more accurate but far less mobile. I'd bet money that Sumlin plays them both....
Reply Quote
zephyr88
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Signel • 10:35a, 10/14/17
Signel said:
Stark was more accurate but far less mobile. I'd bet money that Sumlin plays them both....
hang on... here we go again... Sumlin is gonna go full Sumlin... AGAIN?!?!?!
Reply Quote
ebag02
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Signel • 10:36a, 10/14/17
Signel said:
Stark was more accurate but far less mobile. I'd bet money that Sumlin plays them both....


Mond has a better completion percentage than starkel. Starkel completed less than 50% of his passes.
Reply Quote
BanderaAg956
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to pingpro4 • 10:37a, 10/14/17
pingpro4 said:
I agree it would be nice to see what he can do but the constant rotation of QBs is one of the biggest issues since 2013. Time to stick with one kid and give him a shot


You mean stick with one QB like we did against UCLA before Starkel's injury?

Oh wait, we changed QB's for no reason in the UCLA game, turn about is fair play... but I don't expect Sumlin to be fair!
Reply Quote
TxAg76
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Luigi Vampa • 10:42a, 10/14/17
TE-aXm-AS said:
StrykerAg said:
Redshirt Starkel, continue playing Mond for the season. Let them compete in the offseason. Hopefully the loser understands injuries happen and they can go in at anytime and does not transfer.


Starkel has used his RS year, and would not qualify for a medical RS, so he will just be a normal backup.

He doesn't have a RS option, true. You only get one. But why would Starkel not qualify for a medical exemption? I don't think he played enough time to push him over that limit (although I'm not sure of the exact parameters of the limit)
Reply Quote
Definitely Not A Cop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAg76 • 10:44a, 10/14/17
TxAg76 said:
TE-aXm-AS said:
StrykerAg said:
Redshirt Starkel, continue playing Mond for the season. Let them compete in the offseason. Hopefully the loser understands injuries happen and they can go in at anytime and does not transfer.


Starkel has used his RS year, and would not qualify for a medical RS, so he will just be a normal backup.

He doesn't have a RS option, true. You only get one. But why would Starkel not qualify for a medical exemption? I don't think he played enough time to push him over that limit (although I'm not sure of the exact parameters of the limit)


(Frank White bat signal)
Reply Quote
Luigi Vampa
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAg76 • 10:45a, 10/14/17
TxAg76 said:
TE-aXm-AS said:
StrykerAg said:
Redshirt Starkel, continue playing Mond for the season. Let them compete in the offseason. Hopefully the loser understands injuries happen and they can go in at anytime and does not transfer.


Starkel has used his RS year, and would not qualify for a medical RS, so he will just be a normal backup.

He doesn't have a RS option, true. You only get one. But why would Starkel not qualify for a medical exemption? I don't think he played enough time to push him over that limit (although I'm not sure of the exact parameters of the limit)


Because he's eligible to play now. You don't get a medical redshirt granted when you're only ruled out for 5.5 games. I forget the exact rule, but I think you have to be ruled medically ineligible to play for at least 10 of the 12 games or something like that. Also, I was under the impression that medical redshirts were only granted when you had expended all normal eligibility, but I could be wrong on that.
Reply Quote
No Spin Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KidDoc • 10:48a, 10/14/17
KidDoc said:
pingpro4 said:
Name the last A&M QB to show the improvement he has during a season
Johnny Football 2012.


Reply Quote
No Spin Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to zephyr88 • 10:50a, 10/14/17
zephyr88 said:
Signel said:
Stark was more accurate but far less mobile. I'd bet money that Sumlin plays them both....
hang on... here we go again... Sumlin is gonna go full Sumlin... AGAIN?!?!?!


With our luck Sumlin will find a way to epic fail on this. Nothing against Starkel, but I hope he doesn't see the field tonight.
Reply Quote
zephyr88
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to No Spin Ag • 10:57a, 10/14/17
No Spin Ag said:
zephyr88 said:
Signel said:
Stark was more accurate but far less mobile. I'd bet money that Sumlin plays them both....
hang on... here we go again... Sumlin is gonna go full Sumlin... AGAIN?!?!?!


With our luck Sumlin will find a way to epic fail on this. Nothing against Starkel, but I hope he doesn't see the field tonight.
Absolutely, I have zero against Nick. Sucks that he got hurt. But to interject another QB back into the equation at this point doesn't make sense. He was not that mobile to start with - coming off an injury, I don't see how he magically became more mobile. Stick with Mond.
Reply Quote
CrazyDayDuck
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:01a, 10/14/17
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.
Reply Quote
TxAg76
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CrazyDayDuck • 11:03a, 10/14/17
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.
Reply Quote
zephyr88
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAg76 • 11:07a, 10/14/17
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.
TCU, UH, UTEP or Oklahoma?
Reply Quote
CrazyDayDuck
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAg76 • 11:11a, 10/14/17
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.

The weird thing is, Martell seemed like he would fit Mazzone's RPO perfectly. Yet Mazzone preferred Starkel over Martell.

Starkel is a drop back passer. He should never be running unless the pocket collapses.
Reply Quote
TxAg76
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CrazyDayDuck • 11:15a, 10/14/17
CrazyDayDuck said:
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.

The weird thing is, Martell seemed like he would fit Mazzone's RPO perfectly. Yet Mazzone preferred Starkel over Martell.

Starkel is a drop back passer. He should never be running unless the pocket collapses.

Mazzone does a good job of tailoring it to the abilities of the QB. He doesnt set it up for the dual threat guys the same way he sets up for the less mobile Osweiler and Rosen types.
Reply Quote
TxAg76
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to zephyr88 • 11:16a, 10/14/17
zephyr88 said:
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.
TCU, UH, UTEP or Oklahoma?

Depends on who's coaching at SMU and TxTech
Reply Quote
BanderaAg956
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAg76 • 11:19a, 10/14/17
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.

The weird thing is, Martell seemed like he would fit Mazzone's RPO perfectly. Yet Mazzone preferred Starkel over Martell.

Starkel is a drop back passer. He should never be running unless the pocket collapses.

Mazzone does a good job of tailoring it to the abilities of the QB. He doesnt set it up for the dual threat guys the same way he sets up for the less mobile Osweiler and Rosen types.


So why doesn't he use his slow duel threat QB when we need to run?
Reply Quote
TXAGBQ76
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Frank Grimes • 11:20a, 10/14/17
As does Starkel
Reply Quote
CrazyDayDuck
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TxAg76 • 11:21a, 10/14/17
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.

The weird thing is, Martell seemed like he would fit Mazzone's RPO perfectly. Yet Mazzone preferred Starkel over Martell.

Starkel is a drop back passer. He should never be running unless the pocket collapses.

Mazzone does a good job of tailoring it to the abilities of the QB. He doesnt set it up for the dual threat guys the same way he sets up for the less mobile Osweiler and Rosen types.

That's what I thought to...until I saw that moronic play call that got Nick injured.
Reply Quote
amercer
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to No Spin Ag • 11:25a, 10/14/17
No Spin Ag said:
zephyr88 said:
Signel said:
Stark was more accurate but far less mobile. I'd bet money that Sumlin plays them both....
hang on... here we go again... Sumlin is gonna go full Sumlin... AGAIN?!?!?!


With our luck Sumlin will find a way to epic fail on this. Nothing against Starkel, but I hope he doesn't see the field tonight.
Reply Quote
Azeew
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Drew_Hill • 11:26a, 10/14/17
Drew_Hill said:
pingpro4 said:
Name the last A&M QB to show the improvement he has during a season


Hes gone from completely awful to just kinda awful. Who cares. Give Starkel a chance maybe he blows too but lets at least find out.
You are an idiot.
Reply Quote
zephyr88
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CrazyDayDuck • 11:27a, 10/14/17
CrazyDayDuck said:
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.

The weird thing is, Martell seemed like he would fit Mazzone's RPO perfectly. Yet Mazzone preferred Starkel over Martell.

Starkel is a drop back passer. He should never be running unless the pocket collapses.
Martell is a prima donna little *****...
Reply Quote
CrazyDayDuck
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to zephyr88 • 11:36a, 10/14/17
zephyr88 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.

The weird thing is, Martell seemed like he would fit Mazzone's RPO perfectly. Yet Mazzone preferred Starkel over Martell.

Starkel is a drop back passer. He should never be running unless the pocket collapses.
Martell is a prima donna little *****...

Point being that Starkel does not fit Mazzone's RPO and will probably transfer.

I always like the Tua kid from Hawaii. He would be ideal for Mazzone's offense. Kind of surprised he didn't get any reps after Bama went up 24-3. A LOT of people think he is better than Hurts.
Reply Quote
aarjon
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:41a, 10/14/17
He's ass my dude.
Reply Quote
halfastros81
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:47a, 10/14/17
I would think they'd try to get a med redshirt for Starkel provided they don't need him to play for remainder of season. Having competition at QB is a good thing, rising tide lifts all boats.
Reply Quote
TxAg76
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CrazyDayDuck • 11:49a, 10/14/17
CrazyDayDuck said:
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.

The weird thing is, Martell seemed like he would fit Mazzone's RPO perfectly. Yet Mazzone preferred Starkel over Martell.

Starkel is a drop back passer. He should never be running unless the pocket collapses.

Mazzone does a good job of tailoring it to the abilities of the QB. He doesnt set it up for the dual threat guys the same way he sets up for the less mobile Osweiler and Rosen types.

That's what I thought to...until I saw that moronic play call that got Nick injured.

I hear ya. But was it really the call? Or was it the execution?
Reply Quote
BSCE84ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:49a, 10/14/17
Mond needs to stay in until he gets hurt. He will improve and maybe stay with the team for several years. If we are far ahead maybe let Starkel play in last quarter for experience.

You put Starkel in as starter and here we go again on the transfers.
Reply Quote
TrillOBrien
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Drew_Hill • 11:54a, 10/14/17
Drew_Hill said:
Champ Bailey said:
Mond is better.


You know that how? Seeing Starkle play for one half and giving us a 30 point lead. Mond isnt good just FYI.
dumb post is dumb
Reply Quote
TxAg76
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to zephyr88 • 11:55a, 10/14/17
zephyr88 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
TxAg76 said:
CrazyDayDuck said:
Love how the "experts" here dismiss Mond's UCLA's performance yet point to Starkel's stats as if there would be no improvement with him.

Although I agree that Mond should start. Not because he is necessarily the better of the two (after all Starkel did win the starting spot before he got hurt), but rather because Mazzone's RPO got Starkel killed. Mond is better suited for the RPO.

Starkel will probably transfer after the season.

I think he'll transfer too, sadly.

The weird thing is, Martell seemed like he would fit Mazzone's RPO perfectly. Yet Mazzone preferred Starkel over Martell.

Starkel is a drop back passer. He should never be running unless the pocket collapses.
Martell is a prima donna little *****...

I think it could be as simple as Mazzone preferring bigger body types. And/or didn't care for Martell's attitude. He certainly wasn't lacking in that department.
Could have been an arm strength issue too. Both Starkel and Mond can throw it thru a wall, not sure on Martell.
Reply Quote
83Aggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:03p, 10/14/17
A duel threat QB is ideal for Mazzones offense. Mond has improved dramatically from the first game. Set the single game passing record for a freshman A&M QB. His scrambling ability , Kirk TD, and pass to Buckley on the money was a big part of why we looked respectable against Bama. Mond is your starter.
Reply Quote
TXAGBQ76
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BanderaAg956 • 12:17p, 10/14/17
Wait; what? Now we are going to have QBs dueling for the starting job? Will the duel threat happen during practice or during the game?
Reply Quote
Page 2 of 3 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.