Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

25 Best Overall Position Groups (B/R)

3,431 Views | 12 Replies | Last: 9 yr ago by CrazyDayDuck
TheOC16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2646467-25-best-overall-position-groups-for-2016-college-football-season/page/26

A&M has two on the list, as we should. What's interesting is that the only two other teams with 2 are perennial Top 10 schools (in our division), while our coach is on the hot seat.

Now I know Miles' seat is a bit warm as well, but it's just interesting that programs like Oregon, Clemson, tOSU, etc don't make it on a list like this more than once, but A&M has the talent to do it.

Looking forward to seeing if that talent lives up to potential come the Fall!

edit: I lied, Michigan is on there twice as well.
YourFavAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can you tell us the two groups, so I dont have to click through 27 pages of BS?
TheOC16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would think your guess would be accurate. Hint: it's not O-Line.

Speaking of clicking through BS pages, something has been "wrong" with my B/R lately where it shows everything on one page and I don't have to click through. Hope that's one glitch they don't fix.

Oh, and it's D-Line and Receivers, of course.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DL and receiver it must be.
PlanoAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I never make it thru an entire BR click of arrows to #1. Someone compile and post the list for me. TIA!
Bone6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Now I know Miles' seat is a bit warm as well, but it's just interesting that programs like Oregon, Clemson, tOSU, etc don't make it on a list like this more than once, but A&M has the talent to do it.

Football is a sport where you're often only as strong as your weakest link.

Oregon, Clemson, and tOSU have very good if not elite units across the board.

We've had bad LB play, QB play, and OL play. I don't care how strong other position groups are when that's the case.
TheOC16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For those too lazy or who have dial up Internet connections:

Alabama Linebackers
Alabama Secondary
Baylol Quarterbacks
Clemson Wide Receivers
Florida Secondary
Florida State Secondary
Georgia Running Backs
Georgia Southern Running Backs
Louisiana State Offensive Line
Louisiana State Secondary
Michigan Defensive Line
Michigan Secondary
North Carolina Wide Receivers
Notre Dame Quarterbacks
Oklahoma Secondary
Oregon Running Backs
Stanford Running Backs
Tennessee Special Teams
Texas A&M Defensive Line
Texas A&M Wide Receivers
Tulsa Wide Receivers
Southern California Offensive Line
Washington Secondary
Washington State Wide Receivers
Wisconsin Linebackers
cretzloff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
For those too lazy or who have dial up Internet connections:

Georgia Southern Running Backs
You serious, Clark?
TheOC16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
quote:
For those too lazy or who have dial up Internet connections:

Georgia Southern Running Backs
You serious, Clark?


I figured someone would think that was a joke. I was surprised, it was one of the few I took the time to read. They had some guys with good numbers, but the article didn't convince me that it wasn't just because of their conference and flexbone system.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
For those too lazy or who have dial up Internet connections



Baylol Quarterbacks


For one more week, at least.
Slwdsm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oregon and tOSU don't play in the SEC west... if they did, I don't think they'd be favored to win the division.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LSU strengths and ours match up
Amazing Moves
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not an overall group but, I think A&M's safeties are that good too.
CrazyDayDuck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
quote:
quote:
For those too lazy or who have dial up Internet connections:

Georgia Southern Running Backs
You serious, Clark?


I figured someone would think that was a joke. I was surprised, it was one of the few I took the time to read. They had some guys with good numbers, but the article didn't convince me that it wasn't just because of their conference and flexbone system.

Oh come on. Not much difference between the BDF and the Sun Belt when you think about it.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.