quote:
It's not true. It's all made up, and it doesnt take much genius to see that regardless of whatever supporting factoids you can make up that may or may not go along with it. At second 3rd, 4th, 25th "blush" its still a bunch of garbage,
quote:The lawyers generally know who are on the target lists as they review existing contracts for candidate coaches.
I suspect that rojo knows someone that is involved with drawing up the contracts/employment paperwork. Someone low on the totem pole, but involved with the rubber meeting the road. That person's knowledge, by definition, would be impeccable.
However, I really don't care... Just glad a brother is willing to share!
quote:quote:
It's not true. It's all made up, and it doesnt take much genius to see that regardless of whatever supporting factoids you can make up that may or may not go along with it. At second 3rd, 4th, 25th "blush" its still a bunch of garbage,
He was right about Chavis when staff specifically said he was wrong.
Why would he be right about that and decide to troll you about this? He has a track record, it's not as if it's a new sock coming out of nowhere with no bona fides...
quote:Lawyers...that certainly explains the "low places" reference. No offense to you personally, madam.quote:The lawyers generally know who are on the target lists as they review existing contracts for candidate coaches.
I suspect that rojo knows someone that is involved with drawing up the contracts/employment paperwork. Someone low on the totem pole, but involved with the rubber meeting the road. That person's knowledge, by definition, would be impeccable.
However, I really don't care... Just glad a brother is willing to share!
Where are the legal staff's offices??
quote:
It happens with every coaching search. People float names so they can laugh behind their computer when people buy in. He floated a wild name from a conference foe, and it actually turned out right.
quote:quote:quote:
It's not true. It's all made up, and it doesnt take much genius to see that regardless of whatever supporting factoids you can make up that may or may not go along with it. At second 3rd, 4th, 25th "blush" its still a bunch of garbage,
He was right about Chavis when staff specifically said he was wrong.
Why would he be right about that and decide to troll you about this? He has a track record, it's not as if it's a new sock coming out of nowhere with no bona fides...
It happens with every coaching search. People float names so they can laugh behind their computer when people buy in. He floated a wild name from a conference foe, and it actually turned out right.
quote:I'm going to print and frame this if you don't mind.quote:This BMF gets it!
quote:
It happens with every coaching search. People float names so they can laugh behind their computer when people buy in. He floated a wild name from a conference foe, and it actually turned out right.
That's as much nonsense as anything else said on this thread. Discounting that he got it right as nothing but lucky speculation? Out of the dozens (or more) names he could have pulled out, he just HAPPENED to hit on the right one, especially one that nobody saw coming but him?
quote:The one thing I know for sure is that when he's wrong again, it'll all be put down to "it was going to happen but it fell apart at the last minute!" and not any admission that he was full of ****.quote:quote:quote:
It's not true. It's all made up, and it doesnt take much genius to see that regardless of whatever supporting factoids you can make up that may or may not go along with it. At second 3rd, 4th, 25th "blush" its still a bunch of garbage,
He was right about Chavis when staff specifically said he was wrong.
Why would he be right about that and decide to troll you about this? He has a track record, it's not as if it's a new sock coming out of nowhere with no bona fides...
It happens with every coaching search. People float names so they can laugh behind their computer when people buy in. He floated a wild name from a conference foe, and it actually turned out right.
Ok, so you believe he just guessed it right? Texags staff and other insiders specifically said, 2 days prior to the Chavis hire, that Chavis was absolutely not a candidate, and yet rojo refuted it and said they were wrong, it was a done deal... In the face of "insider" guarantees that he didn't know what he was talking about. That's a hell of a good guess.
If he's correct again, will it be another lucky guess?
quote:quote:The one thing I know for sure is that when he's wrong again, it'll all be put down to "it was going to happen but it fell apart at the last minute!" and not any admission that he was full of ****.quote:quote:quote:
It's not true. It's all made up, and it doesnt take much genius to see that regardless of whatever supporting factoids you can make up that may or may not go along with it. At second 3rd, 4th, 25th "blush" its still a bunch of garbage,
He was right about Chavis when staff specifically said he was wrong.
Why would he be right about that and decide to troll you about this? He has a track record, it's not as if it's a new sock coming out of nowhere with no bona fides...
It happens with every coaching search. People float names so they can laugh behind their computer when people buy in. He floated a wild name from a conference foe, and it actually turned out right.
Ok, so you believe he just guessed it right? Texags staff and other insiders specifically said, 2 days prior to the Chavis hire, that Chavis was absolutely not a candidate, and yet rojo refuted it and said they were wrong, it was a done deal... In the face of "insider" guarantees that he didn't know what he was talking about. That's a hell of a good guess.
If he's correct again, will it be another lucky guess?
quote:
The contracts connection would make sense, except for AggieRojo posted a lot last year in the wake of his Chavis call about being correct about Kyler's recommitment and Daylon's silent commitment, things that a legal contact probably wouldn't be talking about ...
quote:
Page 1!
quote:yeah all of those things and the best facilities/stadium in the country and best fans. Biased I know, but blatantly true. Spurrier has always spoken highly of us when he's had the chance.
The thing that makes it slightly plausible is that Spurrier himself said he would enjoy being an assistant after retirement. Put that together with 1: he has a good relationship with both Sumlin and our athletic director, 2: we are willing to pay a lot of money, 3: he is relatively in tune with the culture here and we are in the SEC, and 4: he sees a lot of offensive talent now and on the way
you have to admit that it is at least plausible.
What's almost more implausible is that we would want him. But I guess that's not too surprising either.
quote:Compliance????? Mostly lawyers there too, correct??
The contracts connection would make sense, except for AggieRojo posted a lot last year in the wake of his Chavis call about being correct about Kyler's recommitment and Daylon's silent commitment, things that a legal contact probably wouldn't be talking about ...
quote:I lived in Moore and my dad lived in Dorm 16 which became Crocker. When they went down, I bought a brick from each of them for us.quote:Go for it! I still feel like pouring some out for the ole hall. Shame they had to neuter it, kill it and finally dance on its grave by putting that Commons clone where that glorious dorm once stood.quote:I'm going to print and frame this if you don't mind.quote:This BMF gets it!
quote:
It happens with every coaching search. People float names so they can laugh behind their computer when people buy in. He floated a wild name from a conference foe, and it actually turned out right.
That's as much nonsense as anything else said on this thread. Discounting that he got it right as nothing but lucky speculation? Out of the dozens (or more) names he could have pulled out, he just HAPPENED to hit on the right one, especially one that nobody saw coming but him?
quote:Bad Mother Fu**ers!!
Moore Hall Truckers
quote:quote:Compliance????? Mostly lawyers there too, correct??
The contracts connection would make sense, except for AggieRojo posted a lot last year in the wake of his Chavis call about being correct about Kyler's recommitment and Daylon's silent commitment, things that a legal contact probably wouldn't be talking about ...
