quote:
it's not about RT....take the fact he is an aggie out of the equation and I would still think he is overpaid, as is Fitzpatrick, Dalton, Bradford, Cutler, or any other QB not in the top 10 best QB's in the league making more than $10 MM a year. Yes I know it's market value but the position is overpaid. Same can be said for the pitching position in baseball. I know how important both positions are but doesn't change the fact I personally do not believe a mid-level player deserves to be paid in the top 5% of the league.
How is he overpaid if he got paid market rate?
Tannehill is worth exactly what he got. He was paid market value for his services at a man in his job title(QB), and signed a contract reflecting that. Just because there are other players in the NFL that are "better" overall or at their own position doesn't mean ****. Shane Lechler will retire the best punter in NFL history. He'll be the best player in the history of the league at his position. Does he deserve more than Tannehill?
Maybe Mike should worry about honoring his contract, and not deciding after every good year that he "deserves more." He's in freaking year 2 of a brand new contract he signed paying him $28.5 over 4 years. He signed a contract, and after 25% of the length is up, he's *****ing that he's not paid enough. That's on him. If he wanted a chance at making more after 1 year of a contract, sign a 1 year deal. But no, he wanted the comfort of whatever guaranteed money they put on top, or the length of the deal for security.