Those of you arguing this is completely diffferent are hilarious.

Pot, kettle........

It is different... Pryor was receiving money from a BOOSTER. This makes it a recruiting/fair play issue.

And not come story about this on ESPN but jff is still top of the headlines

quote:

---

Even before highly recruited Pryor snubbed rival Michigan in favor of the Buckeyes in a prolonged recruiting process that concluded early in March 2008, Talbott had ingratiated himself with Ohio State football players. Talbott, known then to dabble heavily in the memorabilia business, set players up with signing sessions and, in some cases, sources said, paid them while they still competed for Ohio State.

---

http://m.espn.go.com/general/story?storyId=6652125&src=desktop

quote:

---

It is different... Pryor was receiving money from a BOOSTER. This makes it a recruiting/fair play issue.

---

Is this the same booster that was disassociated with previously..?

They had a pay for play situation going very similar to the Greg Hill situation...

Dennis Allen doesn't need any other distractions.

And the difference isn't about the fact that its regarding a booster...

Pryor and tOSU has already been proven guilty and shown to have made efforts to cover stuff up. Johnny has not been proven guilty of anything, and the whole "case" on him for the time being is circumstantial evidence and the word of a shady broker.

quote:

---

And not come story about this on ESPN but jff is still top of the headlines

---

One thing tOSU had against them that Johnny doesn't.

Where is the money?

[This message has been edited by TexasRebel (edited 8/13/2013 2:23p).]

2011... old news...

O-high-O has been inhaling too much iron oxide in the rust belt if he thinks these two situations are even remotely similar.