aggie1906 said:
AggieOO said:
chipotle said:
Pendragon12 said:
they are human beings who have a right to the road as much as I do. Period.
Do they pay a gas tax, license or registration fees? How about liability insurance?
i hope you don't have any kids that like riding their bikes up and down your street.
Becayse that is the same
Not the same, no.
But if you are really wanting to have this convo.....
License and registration for cyclists:
First question is why? If it is to manage all the rampaging cyclists who run red lights and stoplights, you know that is already illegal, right? Cyclists who do this get stopped and ticketed just the same as any other vehicle. And as discussed in this thread, riding 2 abreast or claiming the lane IS LEGAL depending on the circumstances. The license and registration process will not prevent this from happening.
Not that? Road usage fees? Cyclists don't tear up roadways, but ok, pay to use - lets have that conversation....
Ok, where? who does bike inspections? How much bureaucracy are you wanting to add? How often should the bikes be inspected? What exactly are the inspectors looking for? Because I'm sure so many accidents are caused by improperly maintained bikes....
And the cops will pull over cyclists who don't have this done, right? And ticket them?
Should there be a practical test for licensure? How does that work....bike cop rides beside cyclist? No? Then just a written test....who administers? How much does this cost to legislate and regulate?
And to the quoted point - what bikes are subject to this tax? not kids, ok, 12? Do cops pull over a questionable looking kid, to check how old they are? 16? Again, why, exactly??
If this were a thing, I'd get my family's 7 bikes registered and go through licensure just to shut down this argument. So now I'm out there all properly taxed and licensed. Is that better? HOW?