2024 2.7L TurboMax in-line 4 DOHC

2,753 Views | 35 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by Trinity Ag
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Any relaibility to this Chevy engine? The 2024 rebates are tempting.

I usually hold vehicles for a very long time. I'm not finding a new motor out there that gives a whole lot of confidence in 1/2 ton trucks these days. Curious on any thoughts.
Corps_Ag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Titan XD.... if you can find one
kyledr04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Red Fishing Ag93 said:

Any relaibility to this Chevy engine? The 2024 rebates are tempting.

I usually hold vehicles for a very long time. I'm not finding a new motor out there that gives a whole lot of confidence in 1/2 ton trucks these days. Curious on any thoughts.


I've only heard good things but still have a hard time wanting it
Jbob04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would stick with the 5.3
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Go with the 3.0 baby max and don't look backs. Best half ton engines out there today.
Kyle Field Shade Chaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fords ecoboost will be the most reliable v6 turbo on the market for half tons. None are are flawless.
Silvy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just need to budget in the eventual new valvetrain
1agswitchin4lanes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kyle Field Shade Chaser said:

Fords ecoboost will be the most reliable v6 turbo on the market for half tons. None are are flawless.


X2

Especially the 2.7L Eco
TSW2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We have that engine in my wife's Colorado. It's fantastic in that truck. It's got a ton of torque. Bore and stroke are way over square so it drives kinda like a diesel. I wouldn't hesitate getting one in a half ton if you don't tow frequently don't see it being an issue. I did a lot of research on it before buying and was happy seemed like GM really over engineered it and should be good long term.
TSW2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1agswitchin4lanes said:

Kyle Field Shade Chaser said:

Fords ecoboost will be the most reliable v6 turbo on the market for half tons. None are are flawless.


X2

Especially the 2.7L Eco


Yeah but this is a 4cyl…
spieg12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've got one in a '22 half ton. I really like it. I haven't done any serious towing so I don't know how it does there. It gets great fuel milage and has tons of get up and go. Nothing but oil changes so far. I traded in a '12 half ton with the 4.8L V8 so it has been a huge upgrade engine wise.
reproag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1agswitchin4lanes said:

Kyle Field Shade Chaser said:

Fords ecoboost will be the most reliable v6 turbo on the market for half tons. None are are flawless.


X2

Especially the 2.7L Eco
And it tows 7,500. Plenty for most people
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TSW2012 said:

We have that engine in my wife's Colorado. It's fantastic in that truck. It's got a ton of torque. Bore and stroke are way over square so it drives kinda like a diesel. I wouldn't hesitate getting one in a half ton if you don't tow frequently don't see it being an issue. I did a lot of research on it before buying and was happy seemed like GM really over engineered it and should be good long term.


Also have it in a 24 Colorado and love it.
sts7049
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4 cylinders belong in cars or small SUVs. not full size trucks
JamesPShelley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sts7049 said:

4 cylinders belong in cars or small SUVs. not full size trucks
Seriously.

Turbo...
Eco...
Whatever...

All meaning "Need two/four more cylinders".

But they do this... they do that... they're rated for...

Riiigghhhhht. That's why in the 8 years I've been reading these forums, 90% of the trucks/cars for sale upon these pages are usually no older than a couple of years.

4 banger in a truck pulling 30,000 pounds. Spare me.
1agswitchin4lanes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sts7049 said:

4 cylinders belong in cars or small SUVs. not full size trucks


Damn straight…..

Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JamesPShelley said:

sts7049 said:

4 cylinders belong in cars or small SUVs. not full size trucks
Seriously.

Turbo...
Eco...
Whatever...

All meaning "Need two/four more cylinders".

But they do this... they do that... they're rated for...

Riiigghhhhht. That's why in the 8 years I've been reading these forums, 90% of the trucks/cars for sale upon these pages are usually no older than a couple of years.

4 banger in a truck pulling 30,000 pounds. Spare me.


sts7049
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1agswitchin4lanes said:

sts7049 said:

4 cylinders belong in cars or small SUVs. not full size trucks


Damn straight…..




i can't believe how old that video is now
TSW2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JamesPShelley said:

sts7049 said:

4 cylinders belong in cars or small SUVs. not full size trucks
Seriously.

Turbo...
Eco...
Whatever...

All meaning "Need two/four more cylinders".

But they do this... they do that... they're rated for...

Riiigghhhhht. That's why in the 8 years I've been reading these forums, 90% of the trucks/cars for sale upon these pages are usually no older than a couple of years.

4 banger in a truck pulling 30,000 pounds. Spare me.


Nobody is suggesting it for trucks pulling 30k. But they can be well suited for people that use half ton trucks for commute and with loads in the bed. Then it'll still pull the boat to the lake once a month or pull your U-Haul trailer to move the kids to college.
87IE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1agswitchin4lanes said:

Kyle Field Shade Chaser said:

Fords ecoboost will be the most reliable v6 turbo on the market for half tons. None are are flawless.


X2

Especially the 2.7L Eco
My 23 2.7 has more HP and torque than my 2010 with the 4.6 had.

So far it tows a utility trailer, car hauler, and Uhaul trailer just fine.
JamesPShelley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TSW2012 said:

JamesPShelley said:

sts7049 said:

4 cylinders belong in cars or small SUVs. not full size trucks
Seriously.

Turbo...
Eco...
Whatever...

All meaning "Need two/four more cylinders".

But they do this... they do that... they're rated for...

Riiigghhhhht. That's why in the 8 years I've been reading these forums, 90% of the trucks/cars for sale upon these pages are usually no older than a couple of years.

4 banger in a truck pulling 30,000 pounds. Spare me.


Nobody is suggesting it for trucks pulling 30k. But they can be well suited for people that use half ton trucks for commute and with loads in the bed. Then it'll still pull the boat to the lake once a month or pull your U-Haul trailer to move the kids to college.
I admire your diplomacy. TY.
JamesPShelley
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

JamesPShelley said:

sts7049 said:

4 cylinders belong in cars or small SUVs. not full size trucks
Seriously.

Turbo...
Eco...
Whatever...

All meaning "Need two/four more cylinders".

But they do this... they do that... they're rated for...

Riiigghhhhht. That's why in the 8 years I've been reading these forums, 90% of the trucks/cars for sale upon these pages are usually no older than a couple of years.

4 banger in a truck pulling 30,000 pounds. Spare me.



That's me, except I have far more hair.

As I've gotten older... and having paid attention to trends... technology advances... etc. since forever... I've come to calling out **** (yelling at the clouds).

Thanks for the meme. Have a good Sunday.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TSW2012 said:

JamesPShelley said:

sts7049 said:

4 cylinders belong in cars or small SUVs. not full size trucks
Seriously.

Turbo...
Eco...
Whatever...

All meaning "Need two/four more cylinders".

But they do this... they do that... they're rated for...

Riiigghhhhht. That's why in the 8 years I've been reading these forums, 90% of the trucks/cars for sale upon these pages are usually no older than a couple of years.

4 banger in a truck pulling 30,000 pounds. Spare me.


Nobody is suggesting it for trucks pulling 30k. But they can be well suited for people that use half ton trucks for commute and with loads in the bed. Then it'll still pull the boat to the lake once a month or pull your U-Haul trailer to move the kids to college.


I don't think people realize how capable modern trucks are.

I used a Colorado with the 2.4 to tow a 34' travel trailer and it did it surprisingly well

https://texags.com/forums/46/topics/3499917
TSW2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

TSW2012 said:

JamesPShelley said:

sts7049 said:

4 cylinders belong in cars or small SUVs. not full size trucks
Seriously.

Turbo...
Eco...
Whatever...

All meaning "Need two/four more cylinders".

But they do this... they do that... they're rated for...

Riiigghhhhht. That's why in the 8 years I've been reading these forums, 90% of the trucks/cars for sale upon these pages are usually no older than a couple of years.

4 banger in a truck pulling 30,000 pounds. Spare me.


Nobody is suggesting it for trucks pulling 30k. But they can be well suited for people that use half ton trucks for commute and with loads in the bed. Then it'll still pull the boat to the lake once a month or pull your U-Haul trailer to move the kids to college.


I don't think people realize how capable modern trucks are.

I used a Colorado with the 2.4 to tow a 34' travel trailer and it did it surprisingly well

https://texags.com/forums/46/topics/3499917


100% my wife's Colorado has more capacity, more payload, and more power/torque than most half tons from 20 years ago.

TSJ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't have any first hand knowledge, but based on gm's current track record on gas engines, the 2.7 might be their most reliable gas engine for a 1/2 ton pickup.

If they would put it in a higher trim truck and make better seats it would be pretty perfect for my use case.
1agswitchin4lanes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm kind of surprised at these fuel economy numbers in a midsize.
Green2Maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good or bad? My Tacoma gets low 20s at best. Usually more like 18 in mixed driving.
redag06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Green2Maroon said:

Good or bad? My Tacoma gets low 20s at best. Usually more like 18 in mixed driving.
Bad....with those numbers get a full size truck.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redag06 said:

Green2Maroon said:

Good or bad? My Tacoma gets low 20s at best. Usually more like 18 in mixed driving.
Bad....with those numbers get a full size truck.

A lot of people, like myself, don't want a full size truck. It's easier to drive and park mainly. Doesnt' seem like a huge difference but it is. I went from a 1500 to 2500 to colorado.
TSW2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1agswitchin4lanes said:

I'm kind of surprised at these fuel economy numbers in a midsize.



Yeah I get better than that often see 26-28 on the highway Houston to New Orleans. But the wife wouldn't go to a 1500 yet so that's what we got, too bad cause the 1500 with the 2.7 was probably cheaper with rebates. Her mom has an explorer and she hates the rotary gear select. So ford was off the list. Nissan didn't have rear air vents so it was off the list. She liked the seats better in the Colorado vs Tacoma.
1agswitchin4lanes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redag06 said:

Green2Maroon said:

Good or bad? My Tacoma gets low 20s at best. Usually more like 18 in mixed driving.
Bad....with those numbers get a full size truck.


X2
TSW2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
1agswitchin4lanes said:

redag06 said:

Green2Maroon said:

Good or bad? My Tacoma gets low 20s at best. Usually more like 18 in mixed driving.
Bad....with those numbers get a full size truck.


X2


Agreed, wife was scared for full size truck size. She does 30k miles a year. I'm sure we will get her there in a few years.
el_scorcho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
These engines have cylinder deactivation, aka collapsible lifters. Is it not logical to assume these will have the same failures that are common in the 5.3?

Edit: I just noticed this engine does not use collapsible lifters, but rather a 3-phase sliding cam shaft setup.
TSW2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
el_scorcho said:

These engines have cylinder deactivation, aka collapsible lifters. Is it not logical to assume these will have the same failures that are common in the 5.3?

Edit: I just noticed this engine does not use collapsible lifters, but rather a 3-phase sliding cam shaft setup.


There are some pretty trick things in this engine.

The 3 phase cam shaft worries me the most.
The electric water pump is clever. Allows quicker warm up, will direct hot water to heater core in winter and will continue to cool the engine after shut down which should add longevity to a hot turbo engine. The variable displacement oil pump is proven reliable and provides stable oil pressure and volume at all loads/rpm.
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pulled the trigger on a 2025 Trail Boss with the 3.0 Duramax.

Much appreciative of the rec's here.

I like the looks of the Silverados over the Fords.

This will be my first time around a diesel again since my Dad bought an F250 in '84.

Gotta learn what this DEF stuff is.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.