The eco boost engine is designed around having the turbos. So yes, the engine is different and comparatively more expensive to maintain simply because it has turbos.drummer0415 said:Mas89 said:
Obviously, costly future repairs and problems are more likely with the turbos.
This is simply not true. The 3.5 Ecoboost has its share of common issues, but none of them are related to the turbos. I am far from an ecoboost fanboi. My truck has had the cam phasers replaced FOUR times, with the most recent one being on my dime. It's definitely not a perfect engine and I have no reason to defend it, but this automatic assumption that the engine is going to have more issues or more costly repairs simply because it has turbos is simply not true.
My truck has also had the starter, radiator, TCM, AC compressor, and water pumped replaced, but those components can all go out no matter which engine you have, and again, they have nothing to do with having turbos.
How many F150s with the 5.0 engine have had the cam phasers replaced four times? Not to mention the other problems unique to the eco boost engine…
My new F250 is in the shop for the second time since buying in July. Loud wining noise in the rear end. Changed the pinion bearings the first time but still making a metallic winning noise when accelerating. Sounds similar to the cicada bugs in my oak trees at night.
Have another loaner F150 with the 3.5.