Diggity said:
Video wasn't a good look for shooter.
Not a shocking charge.
Quote:
- prevent:
- arson,
- burglary,
- robbery and aggravated robbery,
- theft at night, or
- criminal mischief during nighttime;
Yeah, it was at night. Thanks for the clarification.Diggity said:
looks like the employee would have been ok if this had happened at night.Quote:
- prevent:
- arson,
- burglary,
- robbery and aggravated robbery,
- theft at night, or
- criminal mischief during nighttime;
Quote:
Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
Quote:
Yeah, it was at night.
