Ag_07 said:
You do realize it's not much different than how things are now?
No, he's a lawyer.IDaggie06 said:
Maybe he owns a retail store that will have to close..
Wycliffe_03 said:
For now...not for long. A lot of course are going to go belly up for sure.
Quote:
How many ****ing times does exponential growth have to be explained before idiots start to understand?
I understand the reaction to this has been exponentially blown out of proportion.HouAggie2007 said:
How many ****ing times does exponential growth have to be explained before idiots start to understand?
07fta07 said:Wycliffe_03 said:
For now...not for long. A lot of course are going to go belly up for sure.
What about private clubs? They're still pulling in dues. Can they allow members to play golf even if we go shelter in place? The shelter in place allows for outdoor exercise.
Mine is up and running. Spacing out tee times and not allowing guests on property.07fta07 said:Wycliffe_03 said:
For now...not for long. A lot of course are going to go belly up for sure.
What about private clubs? They're still pulling in dues. Can they allow members to play golf even if we go shelter in place? The shelter in place allows for outdoor exercise.
I don't think anyone is suggesting that it isn't important, but most churches I know have provided an online format available.Sasappis said:Ag_07 said:
So what do want to do that the big bad govt won't let you do?
You can still go to the grocery store, bank, auto mechanic, get food, go to liquor store. You can still go outside for exercise, walks, play time with the kids.
What else do you need to do?
Go to Church? That one has been fairly important in this country for a long time.
You left out peaceably part and let me tell you, brother, there is no peace to be found in doing a boob luge off some JuCo undergrad who drove down to Padre from SOWELA.Sasappis said:Head Ninja In Charge said:
Like many others have said, it really is just formalizing what most of us have already been doing over the past 8 days. The only real change (a good one) is that it'll prevent these dumb**** kids from partying en masse on the beach like we saw during spring break.
So you mean it will reduce the right to assemble? I wonder if there are any rules about that.
How dare the govt infringe upon your right to infect whoever the **** you want....Sasappis said:Head Ninja In Charge said:
Like many others have said, it really is just formalizing what most of us have already been doing over the past 8 days. The only real change (a good one) is that it'll prevent these dumb**** kids from partying en masse on the beach like we saw during spring break.
So you mean it will reduce the right to assemble? I wonder if there are any rules about that.
What is your expected end date on being able to get out and "infect whoever the **** you want.."?RM1993 said:How dare the govt infringe upon your right to infect whoever the **** you want....Sasappis said:Head Ninja In Charge said:
Like many others have said, it really is just formalizing what most of us have already been doing over the past 8 days. The only real change (a good one) is that it'll prevent these dumb**** kids from partying en masse on the beach like we saw during spring break.
So you mean it will reduce the right to assemble? I wonder if there are any rules about that.
I don't have one and nothing that has been proscribed so far prevents you or anyone else from being able to get out and take a walk or go to the grocery store or gas station.....yet you somehow feel like your constitutional rights have been infringed upon and you should have unfettered access to everything as you had before....Gap said:What is your expected end date on being able to get out and "infect whoever the **** you want.."?RM1993 said:How dare the govt infringe upon your right to infect whoever the **** you want....Sasappis said:Head Ninja In Charge said:
Like many others have said, it really is just formalizing what most of us have already been doing over the past 8 days. The only real change (a good one) is that it'll prevent these dumb**** kids from partying en masse on the beach like we saw during spring break.
So you mean it will reduce the right to assemble? I wonder if there are any rules about that.
Sheep don't ask questions either.RM1993 said:I don't have one and nothing that has been proscribed so far prevents you or anyone else from being able to get out and take a walk or go to the grocery store or gas station.....yet you somehow feel like your constitutional rights have been infringed upon and you should have unfettered access to everything as you had before....Gap said:What is your expected end date on being able to get out and "infect whoever the **** you want.."?RM1993 said:How dare the govt infringe upon your right to infect whoever the **** you want....Sasappis said:Head Ninja In Charge said:
Like many others have said, it really is just formalizing what most of us have already been doing over the past 8 days. The only real change (a good one) is that it'll prevent these dumb**** kids from partying en masse on the beach like we saw during spring break.
So you mean it will reduce the right to assemble? I wonder if there are any rules about that.
Governments have always had the authority to clamp down during states of national emergency. Would you have kept your lights on during WWII when air raid sirens went off simply because the govt can't constitutionally tell you to shut them off? Of course not! Yet somehow today otherwise rational people feel like their constitutional rights are more important than the safety of their fellow man....
I'm sure everyone involved would like to give hard answers to your questions, but this is uncharted territory and everyone is doing their best to work off of the scant information and data available.Gap said:Sheep don't ask questions either.RM1993 said:I don't have one and nothing that has been proscribed so far prevents you or anyone else from being able to get out and take a walk or go to the grocery store or gas station.....yet you somehow feel like your constitutional rights have been infringed upon and you should have unfettered access to everything as you had before....Gap said:What is your expected end date on being able to get out and "infect whoever the **** you want.."?RM1993 said:How dare the govt infringe upon your right to infect whoever the **** you want....Sasappis said:Head Ninja In Charge said:
Like many others have said, it really is just formalizing what most of us have already been doing over the past 8 days. The only real change (a good one) is that it'll prevent these dumb**** kids from partying en masse on the beach like we saw during spring break.
So you mean it will reduce the right to assemble? I wonder if there are any rules about that.
Governments have always had the authority to clamp down during states of national emergency. Would you have kept your lights on during WWII when air raid sirens went off simply because the govt can't constitutionally tell you to shut them off? Of course not! Yet somehow today otherwise rational people feel like their constitutional rights are more important than the safety of their fellow man....
Can you describe what you are trying to accomplish? Are we "flattening the curve" and doing this for 6 months and still being over ICU capacity for 12-18 months? Are we sheltering in place until the virus has been eliminated from the United States?
If the result is global depression, poverty, rampant unemployment, hunger, suicide, increased violence is that acceptible? And for a virus with a mortality rate expected to be 0.5% and under.
This is exactly how Japanese Americans got put into camps congrats man!RM1993 said:I don't have one and nothing that has been proscribed so far prevents you or anyone else from being able to get out and take a walk or go to the grocery store or gas station.....yet you somehow feel like your constitutional rights have been infringed upon and you should have unfettered access to everything as you had before....Gap said:What is your expected end date on being able to get out and "infect whoever the **** you want.."?RM1993 said:How dare the govt infringe upon your right to infect whoever the **** you want....Sasappis said:Head Ninja In Charge said:
Like many others have said, it really is just formalizing what most of us have already been doing over the past 8 days. The only real change (a good one) is that it'll prevent these dumb**** kids from partying en masse on the beach like we saw during spring break.
So you mean it will reduce the right to assemble? I wonder if there are any rules about that.
Governments have always had the authority to clamp down during states of national emergency. Would you have kept your lights on during WWII when air raid sirens went off simply because the govt can't constitutionally tell you to shut them off? Of course not! Yet somehow today otherwise rational people feel like their constitutional rights are more important than the safety of their fellow man....
v
