Reading definitions after talking out of your ass is better than not reading them at all I guess.
Part of the problem is that a mass transit system to lower demand will have to get multiple entities to sign off to really be effective.CDUB98 said:
Different topic / new string:
Mass transit to lower the numerator/demand.
Given the poor planning of Houston's past, mass transit seems more expensive than mass freeway....at the moment.
Has anyone done cost curves or analysis to find out that inflection point?
this might turn out to be a 2 birds/1 stone situation. Think about the type of worker that commutes but would be a good fit for working remote Or telecommuting. What is the profile of that worker. So when you have them all telecommute, you can build the light rail in a manner that is useful for them (airport and weekend downtown/ballgame type trips) but also put stops in the "communities" you speak of.BBRex said:
Also, building light rail to both airports, The Woodlands, Katy and Pearland might really attract riders if you limit the stations between the ends and downtown to one or two key stops (something like Katy station to Energy corridor to downtown only), but you're going to take serious hits from Council members and others who are upset their "communities" were bypassed by the rai.
aggie_sprt said:
In the meantime, lots of noise about the I-45 "expansion" with Mattress Mack and County Commissioner Lina Hildalgo lining up againist it