Should have had a 35 year anniversary thread for Hurricane Alicia back in August. That one hit my family more than Ike or Harvey.
If you are in a coastal county (and maybe some others as well, not sure), you have to have a separate wind and storm policy. Homeowner's doesn't cover wind or hurricane events in every case. I have to have 3 policies on my house, it sucks.Ags #1 said:
Insurance pays for damage from wind correct?
My money would have been on Drink Juice, Shelby.Ferris Wheel Allstar said:ChiliBeans said:I remember reading a claim here that the bear was a poster on this board.Good Aggie Hunting said:
It was interesting seeing some Ike recaps on the news today. Between the power outage and all the cleanup, my news access was kind of spotty that week.
If it was, my money is on jetch
Finn Maccumhail said:88jrt06 said:
Ike was a wind event.
Depended on where you were located. If you were anywhere close to the coast it was a flood event.
Harvey was a cat 4 but had a storm surge at landfall smaller than Ike. IIRC, Harvey's surge was about 10-12 feet while Ike was like 21-22'.
The main difference being the amount of precipitation. Harvey's flooding was brought on by the 4-5' of rainfall (depending on location, IIRC much of Houston saw around 50" while Nederland recorded over 62" of rain). Ike didn't have anything near that.
Just shows how differing storms can have similar impact- Ike wasn't near the wind event of Harvey and had far less rainfall. But, because Ike was a slow-moving storm of huge size (though lower intensity) it built up a monster storm surge. Harvey caused more wind damage and when it camped out over SE Texas dumping rain the flooding that followed was disastrous.
Tell that to the homeowners along Bolivar whose houses were swept into the bay. That wasn't the wind doing that. And my boat certainly didn't burn up in the dry storage due to wind...it was the storm surge in both cases. Yes, it was not a big rainfall event...but it was way more than just wind doing damage.88jrt06 said:Finn Maccumhail said:88jrt06 said:
Ike was a wind event.
Depended on where you were located. If you were anywhere close to the coast it was a flood event.
Harvey was a cat 4 but had a storm surge at landfall smaller than Ike. IIRC, Harvey's surge was about 10-12 feet while Ike was like 21-22'.
The main difference being the amount of precipitation. Harvey's flooding was brought on by the 4-5' of rainfall (depending on location, IIRC much of Houston saw around 50" while Nederland recorded over 62" of rain). Ike didn't have anything near that.
Just shows how differing storms can have similar impact- Ike wasn't near the wind event of Harvey and had far less rainfall. But, because Ike was a slow-moving storm of huge size (though lower intensity) it built up a monster storm surge. Harvey caused more wind damage and when it camped out over SE Texas dumping rain the flooding that followed was disastrous.
Might want to check with CenterPoint. As I said, for our region, for the overwhelming majority, compared w/Harvey, Ike was a wind event. That explains, as they state, the far more extensive and long-lasting power outages associated with Ike than Harvey, despite the obvious fact that Harvey did far more regional damage. Since Ike hit Gilchrist and Harvey did its entry damage 3 hrs down the coast, people can be mislead. For the Tine, again, IKE WAS A WIND STORM in comparison w/Harvey, the epic rain event. And led to 2 weeks of power-free misery all over the city to prove it....
It was Wayne Dolcefino. I saw him on camera running around in the piers underneath homes once the owners had left.Quote:
That wasn't the wind doing that.
88jrt06 said:Finn Maccumhail said:88jrt06 said:
Ike was a wind event.
Depended on where you were located. If you were anywhere close to the coast it was a flood event.
Harvey was a cat 4 but had a storm surge at landfall smaller than Ike. IIRC, Harvey's surge was about 10-12 feet while Ike was like 21-22'.
The main difference being the amount of precipitation. Harvey's flooding was brought on by the 4-5' of rainfall (depending on location, IIRC much of Houston saw around 50" while Nederland recorded over 62" of rain). Ike didn't have anything near that.
Just shows how differing storms can have similar impact- Ike wasn't near the wind event of Harvey and had far less rainfall. But, because Ike was a slow-moving storm of huge size (though lower intensity) it built up a monster storm surge. Harvey caused more wind damage and when it camped out over SE Texas dumping rain the flooding that followed was disastrous.
Might want to check with CenterPoint. As I said, for our region, for the overwhelming majority, compared w/Harvey, Ike was a wind event. That explains, as they state, the far more extensive and long-lasting power outages associated with Ike than Harvey, despite the obvious fact that Harvey did far more regional damage. Since Ike hit Gilchrist and Harvey did its entry damage 3 hrs down the coast, people can be mislead. For the Tine, again, IKE WAS A WIND STORM in comparison w/Harvey, the epic rain event. And led to 2 weeks of power-free misery all over the city to prove it....
I bet he was hiding in Dallas.Ferris Wheel Allstar said:ChiliBeans said:I remember reading a claim here that the bear was a poster on this board.Good Aggie Hunting said:
It was interesting seeing some Ike recaps on the news today. Between the power outage and all the cleanup, my news access was kind of spotty that week.
If it was, my money is on jetch