from what I heard it is not on the market they think it is a great investment no telling how much a study is costing all the while the mold is growing and it cost 10K a month to watch it grow
Mr mayor is this how you handle your money or just other people's money.
from what I heard it is not on the market they think it is a great investment no telling how much a study is costing all the while the mold is growing and it cost 10K a month to watch it grow
Mr mayor is this how you handle your money or just other people's money.
What can the citizens do?
I think we already know the answers to those questions.
I appreciate the points toward recall but we are in a weak mayor/weak council system here in CS. He is simply a mouth piece for the City Manager at this point. There are conversations, to be sure, but his voice is repeating talking points and not much more.
Look at the evidence here, Mayor Nichols is parroting the points unearthed in the emails, Councilman Yancy can't get straight answers he can share, where else can we point this but the city staff leadership?
Answers will only come when there is actual pressure on the city staff to produce them. FOI requests are probably our only path forward. There's no recall election for staff hired by consultants and recommended to the council.
I disagree (somewhat). I think if we put tremendous pressure on Nichols by floating a recall, that Woods will get the message and move on down the road. Make the removal of Woods a key point in the recall.
Continuing to pressure through Open Records Requests is great though. Someone needs to get Woods' emails.
He may have a second email like a former Secretary of State, but that will be apparent if you do an ORR on other folks around him. Which, makes him look extremely bad if that's the case.
Good points all around. The pressure should continue down any avenue we can find.
In the end, I think what we're asking for is transparency in commercial actions whether real estate or economic incentives. We may agree with the vision if it was transparently presented.
This is a huge mistake that cost everyone a lot of money and ultimately there is no accountability.
What a mess. I sure hope someone good runs against him but the incumbents almost always win in town races.
To fact check him a bit:
College Station does not appear to have a low ratio of city employees per capita. The city had 865 government employees as of May 20084. Given the population of 120,451 in 20221, this translates to approximately 71.8 city employees per 10,000 residents. While we don't have more recent employment figures, this ratio is higher than those of larger cities like New York (60.0), Los Angeles (31.7), and Chicago (48.2)9. It's important to note that direct comparisons may not be entirely accurate due to differences in city sizes, structures, and the age of the data. However, the available information suggests that College Station's ratio of city employees to population is not particularly low. Citations: [ol]
College Station does not have a lower than average tax rate compared to other cities in Texas. The combined sales tax rate for College Station is 8.25%, which consists of the Texas state tax (6.25%), Brazos County sales tax (0.50%), and College Station city sales tax (1.50%)12. This rate is higher than the lowest sales tax rate in Texas, which is 6.25% in cities like Kirvin1. When comparing College Station's sales tax rate to other Texas cities: [ol]
It matches the rate of similarly sized cities like Grand Prairie and Round Rock, both at 8.25%1.
It is lower than the highest rate in Texas, which is 10.25% in cities like Paducah1.
However, it is higher than some other cities, such as Little River-Academy at 7.75%1.
[/ol]Regarding property taxes, College Station's adopted tax rate for 2024 is $0.513086 per $100 valuation4. Without comprehensive data on all Texas cities' property tax rates, it's difficult to determine if this is lower than average. However, this rate is lower than some nearby jurisdictions, such as Bryan ISD ($0.946900) and College Station ISD ($0.972900)5. In summary, while College Station's tax rates are not the highest in Texas, they are also not significantly lower than average when considering both sales and property taxes. Citations: [ol]
One of his talking points was that Macy's owned the building, and they could sell it for storage.
I have to believe that Macy's covenants would include you can't sell to a storage place, or a place of worship. I assume that the entity that owned the mall before CBL acted somewhat like an HOA. Can one of you commercial real estate types add some color here? The computer nerd has no clue.
I wonder where he gets the $7 million appraisal value? BrazosCad gives the current appraisal of the building and land at $4,410,244 and it was $3,850,147 at the time of the city purchasing it.
I do understand that the tax appraisal of a property can be way off of actual market value that a ready, willing, and able would pay but he said the offer was based on an appraisal. I would like to see it,
Comments on WTAW interview - Delucia did a really good job. Interesting that Nichols referenced "Genesis". Just how old is he ? The comments Nichols made makes it clear there is a cabal of some sort and composition among both elected and appointed city leaders. Not all of them I'm sure - but a significant group.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
"for New York boy this isn't bad" so much makes sense now.
My first thought as well. I will add, that was a bad look for the mayor when he was pressed on why they paid over 4 million more for it. He had no clue how to answer that.