Stupe said:
Why are these an issue for anyone that can read a traffic sign?
doubledog said:
It worked so well the first time in CoCS.
They replaced two (stoplight) controlled intersections with two (stoplight) controlled intersections (only backwards).
Red Pear BCS Luke said:Stupe said:
Why are these an issue for anyone that can read a traffic sign?
Because these types of interchanges don't exist in any major cities.
Red Pear BCS Luke said:Stupe said:
Why are these an issue for anyone that can read a traffic sign?
Because these types of interchanges don't exist in any major cities. I'm not worried about my ability to comprehend and read traffic signs. I'm worried about the cars around me and their ability to comprehend/read the traffic signs.
FlyRod said:
Not sure I'm opposed to this at all. Traffic on University headed east gets wayyyyy backed up at that left turn onto the frontage road. If this helps ease that, good.
And the one at University and 2818 has worked just fine, despite early hand wringing.
'Infinitely' is an awful strong word. Maybe it's bc I grew up just west of that interchange and felt with the old style for 25 yrs, but maybe except for game days, it now seems like a bit more of a hinderance. The need to just spend the money for an over/under interchange at 2818/60, University/6 and University/TexasLOYAL AG said:
Is this thing really that difficult to navigate? Are we having big numbers of wrecks at 60/2818 that I'm not hearing about? I got all the whining when it was first proposed and even after it was done but is it really a problem now? Thinking back to what we had before this is infinitely better, isn't it?
There was no way that the overpass at University/60 and 2818 wasn't going to have to controlled intersections.doubledog said:
It worked so well the first time in CoCS.
They replaced two (stoplight) controlled intersections with two (stoplight) controlled intersections (only backwards).
From the article:Red Pear BCS Luke said:Stupe said:
Why are these an issue for anyone that can read a traffic sign?
Because these types of interchanges don't exist in any major cities.
I guess they're becoming more popular.Quote:
There are more in MoPac at Slaughter Lane in Austin; Sam Rayburn Tollway at South Colony Drive in The Colony; LP 375 at SP 601 in El Paso; IH 35 at University Boulevard in Round Rock; and one at Loop 1604 at US 281 in San Antonio, Colwell said.
By the timeline looks like this will go in around the time they add two more lanes to the bypass. May as well get it all done at once. Months of slowdowns ahead.ratfacemcdougal said:
techno-ag said:By the timeline looks like this will go in around the time they add two more lanes to the bypass. May as well get it all done at once. Months of slowdowns ahead.ratfacemcdougal said:
BluHorseShu said:'Infinitely' is an awful strong word. Maybe it's bc I grew up just west of that interchange and felt with the old style for 25 yrs, but maybe except for game days, it now seems like a bit more of a hinderance. The need to just spend the money for an over/under interchange at 2818/60, University/6 and University/TexasLOYAL AG said:
Is this thing really that difficult to navigate? Are we having big numbers of wrecks at 60/2818 that I'm not hearing about? I got all the whining when it was first proposed and even after it was done but is it really a problem now? Thinking back to what we had before this is infinitely better, isn't it?
doubledog said:
It worked so well the first time in CoCS.
They replaced two (stoplight) controlled intersections with two (stoplight) controlled intersections (only backwards).
lockett93 said:
My only question is the cost. How could this cost $284MM?
Wouldn't some overpasses on 2818 be better use of those funds? They short changed the needed 2818 improvements with a double u turn system….
That article is missing lots of relevant information. The article doesn't even mention the highway 6 widening project. This interchange work is part of that project. Current plans are to widen highway 6 to 6 lanes then do improvements at all of the interchanges. That 284 million price tag and timeline are for the entire project, not just this one interchange. For reference the 2818 widening project is between 40-50 million. The DDI at university has been in the plans for about 2 years.PS3D said:lockett93 said:
My only question is the cost. How could this cost $284MM?
Wouldn't some overpasses on 2818 be better use of those funds? They short changed the needed 2818 improvements with a double u turn system….
I saw this as part of the plan to make Highway 6 three lanes in each direction. Maybe that figure is part of the number.
I don't understand either. I go through the one at 2818/University once or twice a day in different directions and I think it's great. Beats having cars turning left across speeding traffic with no street light especially in the dark.Stupe said:
Why are these an issue for anyone that can read a traffic sign?
I assisted on two accidents in front of me when before the sun was up drivers going north on 2818 were attempting to turn left across two lanes of 2818 to get on the entry ramp to go west on 60. Stupid drivers, yes, but accidents occurred there regularly.Smeghead4761 said:
The only accidents I've seen at the 60x2818 DD both involved people trying to take one of the right turning ramps too fast in the rain.
And one DWI who somehow managed to get past a whole bunch of barricades and flashing lights while they were building the thing.
There's a few around the country.techno-ag said:From the article:Red Pear BCS Luke said:Stupe said:
Why are these an issue for anyone that can read a traffic sign?
Because these types of interchanges don't exist in any major cities.I guess they're becoming more popular.Quote:
There are more in MoPac at Slaughter Lane in Austin; Sam Rayburn Tollway at South Colony Drive in The Colony; LP 375 at SP 601 in El Paso; IH 35 at University Boulevard in Round Rock; and one at Loop 1604 at US 281 in San Antonio, Colwell said.
trouble said:
I don't know. The soccer moms in Wilco figured out the one in Round Rock real damn quick.