Boundary Waters WA under attack by Chilean mining company

CT'97

Joined: Mar 24, 2000

Posts: 10,820

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

12:40p, 4/15/26

AG

I try to stay out of politics, especially on this board so I will keep this a direct as I can.

There is a vote likely to happen today in the senate that if passed will allow a Chilean mining company to being sulfite mining just outside and upstream of the Boundary Waters Wilderness Area. This company is currently paying remediation and is in court with other countries because every one of their mines has leeched sulfites into the watershed down stream. This sulfite mine would destroy at least some portion of the wilderness area and likely damage a majority of it. This isn't hyperbole or political rhetoric, it's looking at this companies track record and applying it.

The copper ore from this mine will be sent to China for refinement and sale to a Chinese company to use. None of this helps the USA or our companies. This makes no sense from any way you look at it.

Please contact your senator today and tell them to at least not vote if they can't bring themselves to vote against it.

https://www.savetheboundarywaters.org/bill-passed-house-overturn-mining-ban-near-boundary-waters

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/140/text

CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW
U.S. SENATE SWITCHBOARD:
(202) 224-3121

10

TFAAGG

Joined: Dec 11, 2011

Posts: 1,891

User Profile

Private Message

Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

3:00p, 4/15/26

AG

Thanks for sharing. The $ machine is hard to fight

6

AgDad121619

Joined: Sep 4, 2016

Posts: 8,943

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

9:28p, 4/15/26

AG

What may be the most frustrating part of this story ( and in a north slope mining project that got blocked) is these mining companies are always foreign , mine the US minerals and then send them back overseas for refining. They put on a great environmental story / plan to get the permits and then fail to manage their process safely. Thanks for the heads up - the boundary waters are unique and amazing wilderness that should always be protected

11

1 edit

CaptAmerica03

Joined: Feb 21, 2023

Posts: 46

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

10:57a, 4/16/26

Related/unrelated, but I have a contact with a new technology that is essentially a far more accurate land radar. Would cut back on digging/mining, likely by quite a bit to where half the digging would be the new norm thanks to its accuracy.

If this can help in any way, let me know.

AgDad121619

Joined: Sep 4, 2016

Posts: 8,943

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to CT'97 • 11:15a, 4/16/26

AG

Looks like it passed - ie mining ban is overturned. I did read there are still many site hurdles that have to be cleared before manning could actually be started

1

AllTheFishes

Joined: Jul 17, 2018

Posts: 162

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

2:42p, 4/16/26

AG

Yes, the Republicans decided to make China great and screw over US citizens by selling out natural resources over seas with no promises of any return.

Even if you don't care about the boundary waters this is outright theft of US minerals with no return to the US tax payer.

14

JSKolache

Joined: Jul 19, 2013

Posts: 8,500

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to CT'97 • 9:26p, 4/19/26

AG

CT'97 said:
I try to stay out of politics, especially on this board so I will keep this a direct as I can.

There is a vote likely to happen today in the senate that if passed will allow a Chilean mining company to being sulfite mining just outside and upstream of the Boundary Waters Wilderness Area. This company is currently paying remediation and is in court with other countries because every one of their mines has leeched sulfites into the watershed down stream. This sulfite mine would destroy at least some portion of the wilderness area and likely damage a majority of it. This isn't hyperbole or political rhetoric, it's looking at this companies track record and applying it.

The copper ore from this mine will be sent to China for refinement and sale to a Chinese company to use. None of this helps the USA or our companies. This makes no sense from any way you look at it.

Please contact your senator today and tell them to at least not vote if they can't bring themselves to vote against it.

https://www.savetheboundarywaters.org/bill-passed-house-overturn-mining-ban-near-boundary-waters

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-joint-resolution/140/text

CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW
U.S. SENATE SWITCHBOARD:
(202) 224-3121

This is what we've been doing to the 3rd world for centuries

Gunny456

Joined: Jul 23, 2012

Posts: 15,596

User Profile

Private Message

Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to AllTheFishes • 11:05p, 4/19/26

AG

It takes more than just republicans to get this passed. Sounds like more republicans opposed it than democrats.

TAMU Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences

Boat racing is like a beautiful woman.......expensive, high maintenance, but well worth the fun!

8

AllTheFishes

Joined: Jul 17, 2018

Posts: 162

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to Gunny456 • 12:48p, 4/20/26

AG

I'm not sure where you got that information.
The vote was 50 to 49. 50 republicans supporting and 47 democrats and 2 republicans against.
The senate is controlled by the republicans so this doesn't even get through committee without republican support and then the republican majority leader has to further support it and allow it to go to the floor for a vote.

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00084.htm

edit to add the house votes, it was a straight party line vote with only 1 democrat supporting and 1 republican against.

4

1 edit

rather be fishing

Joined: May 15, 2006

Posts: 21,022

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

8:56a, 4/21/26

AG

Hopefully some will see this outcome and reconsider who they vote for.

CT'97

Joined: Mar 24, 2000

Posts: 10,820

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to rather be fishing • 10:13a, 4/21/26

AG

rather be fishing said:
Hopefully some will see this outcome and reconsider who they vote for.

This is also what I'm worried about. The pendulum is already swinging back and when the democrats take control the response will be even more dramatic and things like science based environmental decisions will be replaced with what we are seeing in Colorado and Oregon.

TheGifGuy

Joined: Sep 16, 2014

Posts: 4,636

User Profile

Private Message

Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to rather be fishing • 12:35p, 4/21/26

AG

rather be fishing said:
Hopefully some will see this outcome and reconsider who they vote for.

It feels like they are all in bed together, damned if we do and damned if we don't at this point.

rather be fishing

Joined: May 15, 2006

Posts: 21,022

User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to CT'97 • 6:57p, 4/22/26

AG

CT'97 said:
rather be fishing said:
Hopefully some will see this outcome and reconsider who they vote for.

This is also what I'm worried about. The pendulum is already swinging back and when the democrats take control the response will be even more dramatic and things like science based environmental decisions will be replaced with what we are seeing in Colorado and Oregon.

I was specifically speaking about the people who (R) currently in control. You know, the ones who think the NIH is wrong.