Title says it all. Would yall rather keep a producing rental property, or sell and buy land?
Back story, moved to Tennessee for work several years ago. Kept my house in Tx and been renting it out ever since. I currently have roughly 350k in equity in it. If I sold the house I could put those funds towards land here in TN and buy outright. I could get 50-100 decent, unimproved acres of wooded land that would be great for hunting and raising my two boys. The property would be completely recreational.
I feel like the fiscally responsible decision is to keep the house, but best decision to raise my family is to have the opportunity to raise my boys with opportunity to hunt and explore.
Thought and opinions?
Back story, moved to Tennessee for work several years ago. Kept my house in Tx and been renting it out ever since. I currently have roughly 350k in equity in it. If I sold the house I could put those funds towards land here in TN and buy outright. I could get 50-100 decent, unimproved acres of wooded land that would be great for hunting and raising my two boys. The property would be completely recreational.
I feel like the fiscally responsible decision is to keep the house, but best decision to raise my family is to have the opportunity to raise my boys with opportunity to hunt and explore.
Thought and opinions?