🚨 Last week, a friend of ours was raided by the feds over J6, his name is Nathan Hughes and he’s from Fayetteville, Arkansas. Nate was raided by the FBI and arrested at gun point. His girlfriend (who just had a miscarriage) was held at gun point and put in handcuffs. The FBI… pic.twitter.com/LOpMQ28eUJ
— Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) September 5, 2023
Quote:
The FBI turned off his security cameras, unplugged his internet, and flipped his house upside down in a search. The feds called the manufacturer of his Liberty Gun Safe and got the passcode to get into it too. All for protesting at the Capitol over 2 1/2 years ago.
Nah, but the Feds have this guy on retainer:Animal Eight 84 said:
I had a mechanical dial lock put on my Ft Knox safe.
I wonder if those type of locks can also have a second combination?

it's probably the same backup code for all safes, so they don't want to give it out.Bregxit said:
From the comments...Quote:
So let me get this straight, when my safe was locked up Liberty's customer service told me to hire a locksmith, but they had the code and could have given it to the owner and didn't?
Oops

BenderRodriguez said:
I think assuming any large business will choose to protect individual privacy over cooperating with the feds is….optimistic, at best.
O.G. said:
My safe is the old school dial kind, and I will never have anything else.
Mine's fairly old school, its possible that there is a record of it, but I would tend to doubt it. The reality is, who knows?Bregxit said:O.G. said:
My safe is the old school dial kind, and I will never have anything else.
Which leads to another set of questions...how many combos does your lock have and does the manufacturer have a backdoor combo or record of the one that was set by the factory?
Trust in the industry just went to negative infinity.
Jason_InfinityRoofer said:BenderRodriguez said:
I think assuming any large business will choose to protect individual privacy over cooperating with the feds is….optimistic, at best.
This is a bit different. I would typically agree with you but I think we are focused on the wrong thing here.
There was a valid warrant. There is no option but to comply with that and I fault no one for that. I'm not losing my business because some yahoo broke the law or did something boneheaded and the feds came to me with a proper warrant per the proper procedure we all talk about.
What we need to focus on is NOT that. We need to focus on the fact that Liberty has an access code that usurps the owners at all. That's a problem. If they had no such code, there would be nothing to help with in terms of the warrant. The safe is not rented from Liberty. It is owned. As such, why anyone but the owner has any codes at all is concerning. It also just killed Liberty off my list of potential new safe providers.
If I'm Fort Knox, Graffunder, Browning, Prosteel, etc, I'd be immediately releasing statements saying I don't keep any additional codes. The fact that we havnt seen that implies that they all have them. If they didn't keep extra codes, they'd state that fact, but they can't because that would be a liability. It's my opinion all of them keep extras and all of them will yield to warrants.
That's the wild part.Bregxit said:
From the comments...Quote:
So let me get this straight, when my safe was locked up Liberty's customer service told me to hire a locksmith, but they had the code and could have given it to the owner and didn't?
Oops