dmperch said:
Bird93 said:
Camo isn't a requirement. That said, there's no such thing as bad weather. There's only bad gear. As others have said, I'm willing to pay top dollar for the most technical and functional gear available because comfort equals time in the field, which breeds opportunity. The cold hard fact is companies like Sitka, First Lite, Kuiu, etc. make the best gear available. If I'm going to buy gear that's technically suited for hunting, then it might as well have a good camo pattern on it too. Why not optimize every possible advantage.
I agree with this. I was duck hunting last year and it was pretty cold with a strong breeze. I was in Sitka, unphased, and pretty darn comfortable. My buddy was in a carhartt and a fleece and was miserable. Layering correctly goes a long way, but I don't regret paying top dollar.
Agree but this goes to my point as well. If your buddy had paid for proper under layering and then added carhartt he would not have been near as miserable and I would argue pretty comparable to your experience.
Your biggest bang for your buck in expensive hunting clothes will always be the first couple layers. The outer layer in my opinion your paying for logo and camo pattern.
The key to better experiences in bad weather is to first understand proper layering, second not sweating or getting heated up on your hike in because it doesn't matter what you paid do this and you will be cold, then third start getting good quality hunting clothing and if you have limited budget start with paying up for the layers closest to the skin and work out.
Camo and Scent are whole separate discussion which in my opinion are not a concern of mine at all if you are doing the rest of your hunting process correctly. ie wind, approach, scouting etc.