The Wonderer said:You should just stop talking.gigemJTH12 said:
I'm starting to think Houston isn't going to get hit with anything significant at all
f burg ag said:
Weather Channel can be beyond ludicrous at times. Dude in Corpus just reported on a bird nest that was blown out of a tree.
gigemJTH12 said:The Wonderer said:You should just stop talking.gigemJTH12 said:
I'm starting to think Houston isn't going to get hit with anything significant at all
Why? There are almost just as many scenarios where it doesn't turn right at us.
Yeah, it's gonna rain. But as far as catastrophic stuff, I'm thinking that has a good shot of not happening.
Can I not give my opinion? Sorry to offend you..
i'm not sure what you are looking at that makes you thing that it needs to make a "hard right turn" to bring the rain to us...gigemJTH12 said:YellAg2004 said:Just out of curiosity, what is leading you to this thought? As far as I know, there hasn't been anything to indicate that any of the projections are weakening.gigemJTH12 said:
I'm starting to think Houston isn't going to get hit with anything significant at all
Houston isn't going to get anything much more than TS-force winds, but we're lined up to get a biblical amount of rain, and it's not like it takes a whole lot of rain to start flooding the city.
Because we aren't getting serious rain unless it takes that hard right turn after landing. That's anything but a certainty
Because people turn to this thread for updated information and trust it because of some of the posters here being respected weather people. To toss something like "nothing is going to happen in Houston" is moronic at best and trolling most likely. Houston floods with a six inch rainfall over a day and we're looking at between 12-20" over a few days. That is a recipe for disaster.gigemJTH12 said:
Why don't you just refute anything I said?
What I said is true. This "biblical" amount of rain is based on a projection that literally every weather person is labeling as "still a lot of uncertainty".
I don't get why what I said is such a big deal. Sensitive folks I guess.
You're either trolling or you haven't seen the models.gigemJTH12 said:The Wonderer said:You should just stop talking.gigemJTH12 said:
I'm starting to think Houston isn't going to get hit with anything significant at all
Why? There are almost just as many scenarios where it doesn't turn right at us.
Yeah, it's gonna rain. But as far as catastrophic stuff, I'm thinking that has a good shot of not happening.
Can I not give my opinion? Sorry to offend you..
without getting into agree or disagree, the reason people get so worked up is because people ignoring forecasts because 'it might be a bust" is why a lot of people die in these events when they aren't a bust. and beyond that staying behind in spite of forecasts and evac warnings puts first responders at risk.gigemJTH12 said:
Why don't you just refute anything I said?
What I said is true. This "biblical" amount of rain is based on a projection that literally every weather person is labeling as "still a lot of uncertainty".
I don't get why what I said is such a big deal. Sensitive folks I guess.
f burg ag said:
Weather Channel can be beyond ludicrous at times. Dude in Corpus just reported on a bird nest that was blown out of a tree.
Wow.gigemJTH12 said:YellAg2004 said:Just out of curiosity, what is leading you to this thought? As far as I know, there hasn't been anything to indicate that any of the projections are weakening.gigemJTH12 said:
I'm starting to think Houston isn't going to get hit with anything significant at all
Houston isn't going to get anything much more than TS-force winds, but we're lined up to get a biblical amount of rain, and it's not like it takes a whole lot of rain to start flooding the city.
Because we aren't getting serious rain unless it takes that hard right turn after landing. That's anything but a certainty
CLP5 isued by the Techtard meteorolgy department?aggiedata said:
More models. We got one rogue aimed at Lubbock.
National Hurricane Center disagrees with you and, with all due respect, I tend to trust them over your gut. Looking like real potential for a rebound / tropical storm into Houston at current time.gigemJTH12 said:YellAg2004 said:Just out of curiosity, what is leading you to this thought? As far as I know, there hasn't been anything to indicate that any of the projections are weakening.gigemJTH12 said:
I'm starting to think Houston isn't going to get hit with anything significant at all
Houston isn't going to get anything much more than TS-force winds, but we're lined up to get a biblical amount of rain, and it's not like it takes a whole lot of rain to start flooding the city.
Because we aren't getting serious rain unless it takes that hard right turn after landing. That's anything but a certainty
Even Harvey couldn't penetrate that dust domerather be fishing said:CLP5 isued by the Techtard meteorolgy department?aggiedata said:
MmMore models. We got one rogue aimed at Lubbock.
You should have left years ago.saysomethin said:
What's the thought for Kingsville residents? Stay or leave?
Here is the track of Hurricane Flora in 1963. It hit Cuba as a Cat 3 hurricane.gigemJTH12 said:
Why don't you just refute anything I said?
What I said is true. This "biblical" amount of rain is based on a projection that literally every weather person is labeling as "still a lot of uncertainty".
I don't get why what I said is such a big deal. Sensitive folks I guess.
AG 2000' said:
They kept it as a 2.
While I suppose technically accurate, they should have upgraded to a 3. People in the danger area are going to hear that it's still a two and think less of it. They should have upgraded due to the urgency around the wind and flooding situation if nothing else.
